| Literature DB >> 25180206 |
Metin Çabuk1, Serdar Eratak1, Hatice Basmacioğlu Malayoğlu2.
Abstract
One hundred and sixty-eight 11-week-old laying quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) were fed one of the following three diets: (1) control: basal diet with no lentil (Lens culinaris L.) byproduct; (2) inclusion of 10% lentil byproduct; (3) inclusion of 20% lentil byproduct. In the recent years, colour sorting machines are used in order to separate red lentils according to their colours. The goal is to select the items which are discoloured, not as ripe as required, or still with hull even after dehulling of lentil seed. During the sorting, a new byproduct called "sorting byproduct" leftover is obtained. The byproduct is cleaner and is of a higher quality than other lentil byproducts. This experiment was conducted to study the effects of the inclusion of different levels of lentil byproduct on laying quail performance. The experimental treatment included 10% or 20% lentil byproduct in the diet, and this was fed to quails aged between 11 and 22 weeks. The inclusion of 10% and 20% levels of lentil byproduct in the diet significantly increased egg production, but feed intake and feed conversion ratio were not significantly affected. Egg weight decreased significantly following the inclusion of 20% lentil byproduct. The inclusion of lentil byproduct in the diet increased the deposition of yellow yolk pigments and decreased malonaldehyde formation in the yolk.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25180206 PMCID: PMC4142671 DOI: 10.1155/2014/742987
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Nutrient and tannin contents of lentil byproduct.
| Dry matter, % | 88.20 |
| Crude protein, % | 25.42 |
| Ether extract, % | 2.19 |
| Crude cellulose, % | 3.48 |
| Crude ash, % | 6.11 |
| Starch, % | 42.9 |
| Sucrose, % | 3.12 |
| Condensed tannin; g/kg, dry matter | 4.41 |
| Metabolisable energy, Kcal/kg | 2930 |
Figure 1Lentil byproduct used in the experiment.
Ingredient and chemical composition of diets used in the study (as fed).
| Ingredients (%) | Control | 10% lentil byproduct | 20% lentil byproduct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 57.22 | 51.71 | 45.86 |
| Full fat soybean | 16.24 | 15.77 | 16.02 |
| Fish meal, | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Soybean meal | 13.00 | 9.00 | 4.51 |
| Lentil by product | 0 | 10.0 | 20.0 |
| Methionine | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 1.13 | 1.18 | 1.25 |
| Ground limestone | 8.88 | 8.87 | 8.85 |
| Salt | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Vitamin-mineral premix∗ | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Total |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Composition, % (analyzed) | |||
| Dry matter | 90.57 | 91.80 | 91.50 |
| Crude protein | 17.69 | 17.78 | 17.56 |
| Crude cellulose | 3.12 | 2.68 | 2.34 |
| Crude ash | 10.94 | 11.85 | 11.98 |
| Ether extract | 5.49 | 4.91 | 4.89 |
| Starch | 43.79 | 44.67 | 44.65 |
| Sucrose | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.7 |
| Metabolisable energy, Kcal/kg | 2929 | 2921 | 2917 |
|
| |||
| Calculated composition, % | |||
| Methionine + cysteine | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| Lysine | 1.10 | 1.09 | 1.08 |
| Calcium | 3.50 | 3.49 | 3.50 |
| Available phosphorus | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.40 |
∗Supplied per kg of diet: vitamin A, 12 000 IU; vitamin D3, 3 000 IU; vitamin E, 30 mg; vitamin K3, 5 mg; vitamin B1, 3 mg; vitamin B2, 12 mg; vitamin B6, 4 mg; vitamin B12, 0.03 mg; nicotinamide, 55 mg; calcium-D-pantothenate, 15 mg; folic acid, 2 mg; D-biotin, 0.250 mg; choline chloride, 150 mg; Mn, 80 mg; Fe, 40 mg; Zn, 60 mg; Cu, 5 mg; I, 0.4 mg; Co, 0.1 mg; Se, 0.15 mg.
The effect of the dietary inclusion of lentil byproduct on egg production, FCR and feed intake, and egg weight of quails.
| Parameter | Control | 10% lentil byproduct | 20% lentil byproduct | Pooled SEM |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg production, % | 87.72b | 90.66a | 90.05a | 0.52 | 0.0001 |
| Egg weight, g | 11.56a | 11.50a | 11.32b | 0.04 | 0.0001 |
| Feed intake, g/quail | 25.69 | 25.63 | 25.22 | 0.47 | 0.7464 |
| Feed conversion ratio, g, fed/g, egg | 2.53 | 2.48 | 2.49 | 0.04 | 0.5732 |
a,bMeans within row with no common superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05).
SEM: standard error of the mean.
Figure 2Effect of lentil byproduct on egg production.
Figure 3Effect of lentil byproduct on egg weight.
The effect of the dietary inclusion of lentil byproduct on yolk color.
| Groups/parameters |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 55.23b | −1.81 | 41.66b |
| 10% lentil byproduct | 56.71a | −1.48 | 41.83b |
| 20% lentil byproduct | 56.98a | −1.76 | 43.96a |
| Pooled SEM | 0.392 | 0.2934 | 0.562 |
|
| 0.0480 | 0.5118 | 0.0079 |
L* = 0 denoting dark and values close to L* = 100 denoting light.
If a* value minus (−) green, plus (+) the red color.
If b* value minus (−) blue, plus (+) the yellow color.
a,bMeans within column with no common superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05).
SEM: standard error of the mean.
Figure 4Effect of lentil byproduct on yolk color L* value, L* = 0 denoting dark and values close to L* = 100 denoting light.
Figure 5Effect of lentil byproduct on yolk b* value; if b* value minus (−) blue, plus (+) the yellow color.
Effects of lentil byproduct on lipid oxidation (mg MDA/kg yolk) and pH of quail eggs.
| mg MDA/kg egg yolk | pH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment groups | Control | 0.29a | 5.14 |
| 10% lentil byproduct | 0.26b | 5.30 | |
| 20% lentil byproduct | 0.21c | 5.20 | |
| Pooled SEM | 0.008 | 0.056 | |
|
| |||
| Storage time, day | 0 | 0.27 | 6.35d |
| 7 | 0.24 | 5.56c | |
| 14 | 0.25 | 4.78b | |
| 21 | 0.26 | 4.54a | |
| 28 | 0.25 | 4.81b | |
| Pooled SEM | 0.010 | 0.073 | |
|
| |||
| Probability | |||
| Treatment | 0.0001 | 0.1170 | |
| Storage time | 0.138 | 0.0001 | |
Figure 6Effect of lentil byproduct on lipid oxidation.
Figure 7Effect of storage time on egg pH.