Literature DB >> 25179979

Totally thoracoscopic versus open surgery for closure of atrial septal defect: propensity-score matched comparison.

Zheng Zhe1, Hua Kun1, Xu Xuezeng2, Chen Yunge3, Ma Zengshan4, Guo Huiming5, Liu Liming6, Tiao Liang7, Wang Zhiwei8, Sun Hansong1, Hu Shengshou1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare early clinical outcomes of surgical repair for isolated atrial septal defect (ASD) with a totally thoracoscopic approach without robotic assistance versus a conventional open procedure.Between September 2010 and June 2012, 254 consecutive patients with isolated ASD underwent totally thoracoscopic surgery without robotic assistance in seven institutions participating in the nationwide multi-centered registry in China. During the same period, these patients were matched using propensity score methodology with 254 patients who had accepted conventional open surgery through a median sternotomy. The early in-hospital results between the two groups were analyzed and compared.The patient age was 26.8 ± 14.0 years and weight was 52.9 ± 16.9 kg in the totally thoracoscopic group. The totally thoracoscopic surgery required longer aortic clamp time (32.1 ± 17.3 minutes versus 28.3 ± 16.7 minutes, P = .01); shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit (25.3 ± 12.2 hours versus 34.8 ± 24.4 hours, P = .001); shorter length of stay in hospital (6.5 ± 6.3 days versus 7.9 ± 6.4 days, P = .008); and shorter mechanical ventilation time (8.3 ± 5.0 hours versus 11.4 ± 14.8 hours, P = .04). The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (62.7 ± 29.3 minutes versus 61.5 ± 28.0 minutes, P = .64) showed no significant difference between the two groups. The totally thoracoscopic group had significantly less postoperative chest tube drainage (322.1 ± 213.7 mL versus 462.8 ± 398.4 mL, P = .001). The intraoperative (35.4% versus 38.6%, P = .46) and postoperative blood products usage (20.9% versus 21.3%, P = .91) showed no significant difference between the two groups.There also was no significant difference in mortality and major in-hospital complications between the two groups. The early outcomes for treatment of isolated ASD were similar between the totally thoracoscopic group conventional open operation performed through median sternotomy, despite a longer aortic clamp time in the totally thoracoscopic group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25179979     DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.2014382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Surg Forum        ISSN: 1098-3511            Impact factor:   0.676


  4 in total

1.  How to set-up a program of minimally-invasive surgery for congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Juan-Miguel Gil-Jaurena; Ramón Pérez-Caballero; Ana Pita-Fernández; María-Teresa González-López; Jairo Sánchez; Juan-Carlos De Agustín
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2016-07

2.  Is tri-port totally thoracoscopic surgery for mitral valve replacement a feasible approach?

Authors:  Kai Liu; Hourong Sun; Biao Wang; Hongliang Ma; Bingbing Ma; Zengshan Ma
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-01

3.  Total Thoracoscopic versus Robotic Surgery for Repair of Atrial Septum Defect: A Propensity Matching Score Analysis.

Authors:  Yanyi Liu; Zhuang Liu; Xin Li; Ning Li; Ruirui Kong; Yiyao Jiang; Shenglin Ge; Chengxin Zhang
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Comparative Study between Surgical Repair of Atrial Septal Defect via Median Sternotomy, Right Submammary Thoracotomy, and Right Vertical Infra-Axillary Thoracotomy.

Authors:  Zeng-Rong Luo; Qiang Chen; Ling-Li Yu; Liang-Wan Chen; Zhong-Yao Huang
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.