Atsumori Hamahata1, Takesi Beppu2, Satoshi Shirakura2, Akio Hatanaka2, Takashi Yamaki3, Takashi Saitou4, Hiroyuki Sakurai3. 1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Japan. Electronic address: a.hamahata@cancer-c.pref.saitama.jp. 2. Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Japan. 3. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan. 4. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Assessment of tongue function following tongue reconstruction is important to evaluate patient status. To assess tongue function in patients who had undergone tongue reconstruction, the surgical team used a simple, hand-held tongue pressure measurement device to measure tongue power. METHODS: Tongue power of 30 patients (25 males, 5 females; average age: 53.6±15.0 years) was calculated using a hand-held tongue pressure measurement device, six months postoperation. The defects were classified into minimal glossectomy (MG) (n=8), near-half partial glossectomy of the mobile tongue (PG) (n=5), hemi-glossectomy (HG) (n=4), more than half partial glossectomy of the mobile tongue (SG-MT) (n=7), and subtotal glossectomy (SG) (n=6). As seen in other tongue assessments, a simple articulatory test, food evaluation, and speech intelligibility assessment were also performed; resulting correlations were statistically calculated using tongue pressure values. RESULTS: The tongue pressure values were 94.0±14.5% in MG, 48.5±13.2(a) % in PG, 40.4±18.7(a) % in HG, 19.3±7.7(a,b) % in SG-MT, and 15.3±5.6(a,b) % in SG (a: <0.05 vs. MG, b: <0.05 vs. PG). The Pearson r was 0.77, 0.67, and 0.74 when correlated with simple articulatory test, food evaluation, and speech intelligibility assessment, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tongue pressure measurement in patients with tongue cancer resection and reconstruction facilitated determination of patients' tongue function status.
OBJECTIVE: Assessment of tongue function following tongue reconstruction is important to evaluate patient status. To assess tongue function in patients who had undergone tongue reconstruction, the surgical team used a simple, hand-held tongue pressure measurement device to measure tongue power. METHODS: Tongue power of 30 patients (25 males, 5 females; average age: 53.6±15.0 years) was calculated using a hand-held tongue pressure measurement device, six months postoperation. The defects were classified into minimal glossectomy (MG) (n=8), near-half partial glossectomy of the mobile tongue (PG) (n=5), hemi-glossectomy (HG) (n=4), more than half partial glossectomy of the mobile tongue (SG-MT) (n=7), and subtotal glossectomy (SG) (n=6). As seen in other tongue assessments, a simple articulatory test, food evaluation, and speech intelligibility assessment were also performed; resulting correlations were statistically calculated using tongue pressure values. RESULTS: The tongue pressure values were 94.0±14.5% in MG, 48.5±13.2(a) % in PG, 40.4±18.7(a) % in HG, 19.3±7.7(a,b) % in SG-MT, and 15.3±5.6(a,b) % in SG (a: <0.05 vs. MG, b: <0.05 vs. PG). The Pearson r was 0.77, 0.67, and 0.74 when correlated with simple articulatory test, food evaluation, and speech intelligibility assessment, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tongue pressure measurement in patients with tongue cancer resection and reconstruction facilitated determination of patients' tongue function status.