Literature DB >> 25179888

CT and MR imaging findings of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas: emphasis on single nodular type.

Eu Hyun Kim1, Sung Eun Rha, Young Joon Lee, Ie Ryung Yoo, Eun Sun Jung, Jae Young Byun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate imaging findings of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH), with emphasis on solitary form at the initial presentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten cases of pathologically confirmed HEH were retrospectively reviewed; seven patients had CT and MR images and three had only CT images. Two radiologists assessed the followings in consensus: lesion number, size, location, presence of capsular retraction and calcification, attenuation, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern.
RESULTS: Initially, HEHs manifested as a single mass (n = 5) or multiple masses (n = 5). One case demonstrated a solitary nodule at first, which subsequently transformed to multifocal nodules on serial follow-up. The maximal diameter of the lesions ranged from 1.8 to 10 cm (mean 4.2 cm). All cases showed predominant subcapsular location. Capsular retraction was seen in multinodular types, but not in solitary types. Two patients had intra-lesional calcifications. HEHs showed minimal enhancement (7/7 patients) on the hepatic arterial phase CT and rim-like enhancement (5/10 patients), minimal enhancement (2/10 patients), multilayered target enhancement (2/10 patients), and peripheral nodular enhancement (1/10 patients) on the portal venous phase CT. On MR images (n = 7), HEHs showed hypointensity on T1-weighted images and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images revealed progressive centripetal fill-in enhancement (7/7 patients). On Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary phase images, HEH manifested as homogeneous hypointensity (3/5 patients) and target-shaped hypointensity (2/5 patients).
CONCLUSION: HEH can manifest as single nodular, multinodular, or diffuse type. Common imaging features of HEH are multiple subcapsular nodules with coalescence, capsular retraction, peripheral, and delayed enhancement. However, HEH can manifest as a solitary subcapsular mass with minimal or rim-like enhancement at early phase and progressive centripetal fill-in enhancement during dynamic phase imaging, representing early stage of HEH. A single nodular type can progress to multifocal nodular type during follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25179888     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0229-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  12 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of histologically proven hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

Authors:  Yi Dong; Wen-Ping Wang; Vito Cantisani; Mirko D'Onofrio; Andre Ignee; Lorenzo Mulazzani; Adrian Saftoiu; Zeno Sparchez; Ioan Sporea; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Imaging features of rare mesenychmal liver tumours: beyond haemangiomas.

Authors:  Rajesh Thampy; Khaled M Elsayes; Christine O Menias; Perry J Pickhardt; Hyunseon C Kang; Sandeep P Deshmukh; Kareem Ahmed; Brinda Rao Korivi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comparison of the clinical and MRI features of patients with hepatic hemangioma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, or angiosarcoma.

Authors:  Zhuangsheng Liu; Lilei Yi; Junhao Chen; Ruqiong Li; Keming Liang; Xiangmeng Chen; Ronggang Li; Wansheng Long
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  Three cases of histologically proven hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma evaluated using a second-generation microbubble contrast medium in ultrasonography: case reports.

Authors:  Jun Arai; Yuu Shimozuma; Yumi Otoyama; Ikuya Sugiura; Yoko Nakajima; Eiichi Hayashi; Atsushi Kajiwara; Risa Omori; Shojiro Uozumi; Miyuki Miyashita; Manabu Uchikoshi; Hiroyoshi Doi; Masashi Sakaki; Tianpeng Wang; Junichi Eguchi; Takayoshi Ito; Toshikazu Kurihara; Jiro Munechika; Takehiko Gokan; Koji Saito; Sakiko Miura; Genshu Tate; Masafumi Takimoto; Hitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Imaging Spectrum of Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Differentiate Them Using MRI.

Authors:  Jelena Djokic Kovač; Aleksandra Janković; Aleksandra Đikić-Rom; Nikica Grubor; Andrija Antić; Vladimir Dugalić
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Typical CT and MRI signs of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

Authors:  L U Gan; Ruiping Chang; Hualan Jin; L I Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Primary Hepatic Malignancies in Patients With and Without Chronic Liver Disease: A Pictorial Review.

Authors:  Lauren F Alexander; Peter Harri; Brent Little; Courtney C Moreno; Pardeep K Mittal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-08-04

Review 8.  Uncommon liver tumors: Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Wu; Nai-Chi Chiu; Yi-Chen Yeh; Yu Kuo; Sz-Shian Yu; Ching-Yao Weng; Chien-An Liu; Yi-Hong Chou; Yi-You Chiou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Clinical characteristics and CT features of hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma and comparison with those of liver metastases.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Wang; Pan Liang; Peijie Lv; Rui Li; Ping Hou; Jianbo Gao
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-01-20

Review 10.  Imaging findings of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma and fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical appraisal of current literature about imaging features of two rare liver cancers.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mulazzani; Margherita Alvisi
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.