PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of disability and service needs in post-earthquake Haiti, and to compare the inclusion and living conditions of people with disabilities to those without disabilities. METHODS: A population-based prevalence survey of disability was undertaken in 2012 in Port-au-Prince region, which was at the centre of the earthquake in 2010. Sixty clusters of 50 people aged 5 + years were selected with probability proportionate to size sampling and screened for disability (Washington Group short set questionnaire). A case-control study was undertaken, nested within the survey, matching cases to controls by age, gender and cluster. There was additional case finding to identify further children with disabilities. Information was collected on: socioeconomic status, education, livelihood, health, activities, participation and barriers. RESULTS: The prevalence of disability was 4.1% (3.4-4.7%) across 3132 eligible individuals. The earthquake was the second leading cause of disability. Disability was more common with increasing age, but unrelated to poverty. Large gaps existed in access of services for people with disabilities. Adults with disabilities were less likely to be literate or work and more likely to visit health services than adults without disabilities. Children with disabilities were less likely to be currently enrolled at school compared to controls. Children and adults with disabilities reported more activity limitations and participation restriction. CONCLUSION: Further focus is needed to improve inclusion of people with disabilities in post-earthquake Haiti to ensure that their rights are fulfilled. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Almost one in six households in this region of Haiti included a person with a disability, and the earthquake was the second leading cause of disability. Fewer than half of people who reported needing medical rehabilitation had received this service. The leading reported barriers to the uptake of health services included financial constraints (50%) and difficulties with transport (40%). People with disabilities did not participate equally in education or employment and had poorer access to health care.
PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of disability and service needs in post-earthquake Haiti, and to compare the inclusion and living conditions of people with disabilities to those without disabilities. METHODS: A population-based prevalence survey of disability was undertaken in 2012 in Port-au-Prince region, which was at the centre of the earthquake in 2010. Sixty clusters of 50 people aged 5 + years were selected with probability proportionate to size sampling and screened for disability (Washington Group short set questionnaire). A case-control study was undertaken, nested within the survey, matching cases to controls by age, gender and cluster. There was additional case finding to identify further children with disabilities. Information was collected on: socioeconomic status, education, livelihood, health, activities, participation and barriers. RESULTS: The prevalence of disability was 4.1% (3.4-4.7%) across 3132 eligible individuals. The earthquake was the second leading cause of disability. Disability was more common with increasing age, but unrelated to poverty. Large gaps existed in access of services for people with disabilities. Adults with disabilities were less likely to be literate or work and more likely to visit health services than adults without disabilities. Children with disabilities were less likely to be currently enrolled at school compared to controls. Children and adults with disabilities reported more activity limitations and participation restriction. CONCLUSION: Further focus is needed to improve inclusion of people with disabilities in post-earthquake Haiti to ensure that their rights are fulfilled. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Almost one in six households in this region of Haiti included a person with a disability, and the earthquake was the second leading cause of disability. Fewer than half of people who reported needing medical rehabilitation had received this service. The leading reported barriers to the uptake of health services included financial constraints (50%) and difficulties with transport (40%). People with disabilities did not participate equally in education or employment and had poorer access to health care.
Authors: Manjula Marella; Alexandra Devine; Graeme Ferdinand Armecin; Jerome Zayas; Ma Jesusa Marco; Cathy Vaughan Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2016-08-02
Authors: R Vergunst; L Swartz; K-G Hem; A H Eide; H Mannan; M MacLachlan; G Mji; S H Braathen; M Schneider Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Hannah Kuper; Islay Mactaggart; Sian White; Carlos Dionicio; Rafael Cañas; Jonathan Naber; Sarah Polack; Adam Biran Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eman Ramadan Ghazawy; Eman Sameh Mohammed; Eman Mohamed Mahfouz; Marwa Gamal Abdelrehim Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Josephine E Prynn; Sarah Polack; Islay Mactaggart; Lena Morgon Banks; Shaffa Hameed; Carlos Dionicio; Shailes Neupane; Gvs Murthy; Joseph Oye; Jonathan Naber; Hannah Kuper Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 3.390