Literature DB >> 25178683

Improving cervical cancer screening attendance in Finland.

Anni Virtanen1, Ahti Anttila, Tapio Luostarinen, Nea Malila, Pekka Nieminen.   

Abstract

High attendance is essential to cervical cancer screening results. Attendance in the Finnish program is currently at 70%, but extensive opportunistic screening occurs beside the organized. A shift from opportunistic to organized screening is imperative to optimize the costs and impact of screening and minimize potential harms. We evaluated the effect of reminder letters (1st reminder) and self-sampling test (2nd reminder) on program attendance. The study population consisted of 31,053 screening invitees in 31 Finnish municipalities. 8,284 non-attendees after one invitation received a reminder letter and 4,536 further non-attendees were offered a self-sampling option. Socioeconomic factors related to participation were clarified by combining screening data to data from Statistics Finland. Reminder letters increased participation from 72.6% (95% CI 72.1, 73.1) to 79.2% (95% CI 78.8, 79.7) and self-sampling further to 82.2% (95% CI 81.8, 82.7). Reminder letters with scheduled appointments resulted in higher increase than open invitations (10 vs. 6%). Screening of original non-attendees increased the yield of CIN3+ lesions by 24%. Non-attendance was associated with young age, immigrant background, lower education level and having never been married. We showed that a total attendance of well over 80% can be achieved within an organized program when the invitational protocol is carefully arranged.
© 2014 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV; attendance; cervical cancer screening; reminder letters; self-sampling; socioeconomic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25178683     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  27 in total

1.  Trends in the cervical cancer screening rates in a city in Japan between the years of 2004 and 2013.

Authors:  Yusuke Tanaka; Yutaka Ueda; Hisayo Kishida; Noriko Hosogai; Akiko Morimoto; Tomomi Egawa-Takata; Shinya Matsuzaki; Eiji Kobayashi; Kiyoshi Yoshino; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Self-sampling for HPV to enhance uptake of cervical cancer screening: Has the time come in Canada?

Authors:  Aisha Lofters; Mandana Vahabi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Cost-effectiveness studies of HPV self-sampling: A systematic review.

Authors:  Colin Malone; Ruanne V Barnabas; Diana S M Buist; Jasmin A Tiro; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Hongyuan Gao; Susan Brandzel; Susan Carol Bradford; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines.

Authors:  Andrzej Nowakowski; Marek Cybulski; Andrzej Śliwczyński; Arkadiusz Chil; Zbigniew Teter; Przemysław Seroczyński; Marc Arbyn; Ahti Anttila
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  An empirical study of the 'underscreened' in organised cervical screening: experts focus on increasing opportunity as a way of reducing differences in screening rates.

Authors:  Jane H Williams; Stacy M Carter
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Impact of scheduled appointments on cervical screening participation in Norway: a randomised intervention.

Authors:  Stefan Lönnberg; Trude Andreassen; Birgit Engesæter; Rune Lilleng; Cecilia Kleven; Annelie Skare; Karin Johansson; Christina Stangeland Fredheim; Ameli Tropé
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Factors associated with participation in cervical cancer screening among young Koreans: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ha Kyun Chang; Jun-Pyo Myong; Seung Won Byun; Sung-Jong Lee; Yong Seok Lee; Hae-Nam Lee; Keun Ho Lee; Dong Choon Park; Chan Joo Kim; Soo Young Hur; Jong Sup Park; Tae Chul Park
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The costs of offering HPV-testing on self-taken samples to non-attendees of cervical screening in Finland.

Authors:  Anni Virtanen; Ahti Anttila; Pekka Nieminen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Self-sampling in cervical cancer screening: comparison of a brush-based and a lavage-based cervicovaginal self-sampling device.

Authors:  Liisa Karjalainen; Ahti Anttila; Pekka Nieminen; Tapio Luostarinen; Anni Virtanen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.