Literature DB >> 25178588

Adhesive interface and bond strength of endodontic sealers to root canal dentine after immersion in phosphate-buffered saline.

Maybell Tedesco1, Mara Cristina Santos Felippe, Wilson Tadeu Felippe, Ana Maria Hecke Alves, Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi, Cleonice Silveira Teixeira.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the bond strength (BS) and the adhesive interface of four endodontic sealers to root canal dentine, before, and after immersion in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to simulate an in vivo environment. Eighty roots were instrumented using ProTaper rotatory files, under irrigation with 17% EDTA and 1% NaOCl. Posteriorly were divided into four groups (n = 20) according to the sealer used: Endofill, AH Plus, Sealapex, and MTA Fillapex. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 10) and stored at 37°C immersed in water for 7 days and in PBS for 60 days. From each subgroup, 1 mm thick sections were obtained. One section of each region (coronal, middle, and apical) was submitted to the push-out test and failures were observed. Twelve sections of each subgroup (four from each region) were evaluated under SEM. Three-way ANOVA evaluation for BS showed significant differences between groups and regions (P < 0.0001), but not between subgroups (P > 0.05). AH Plus had significantly higher BS than the others sealers, regardless of the analyzed subgroup (Tukey's test, P < 0.5). The most common failures were adhesive to dentine and cohesive of the sealer. The SEM evaluation (Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney) showed homogeneous adhesive interface formed and sealer tags in all groups with significant statistical differences with AH Plus, regardless of PBS immersion. AH Plus was superior to the other sealers for both BS and quality of interface formation. Immersion in PBS did not interfere on BS or adhesive interface of the sealers tested.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adhesive interface; bond strength; endodontic sealers; scanning electron microscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25178588     DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsc Res Tech        ISSN: 1059-910X            Impact factor:   2.769


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of two observational methods, scanning electron and confocal laser scanning microscopies, in the adhesive interface analysis of endodontic sealers to root dentine.

Authors:  Maybell Tedesco; Marcelo Carvalho Chain; Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi; Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia; Ana Maria Hecke Alves; Cleonice Silveira Teixeira
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Influence of environment on testing of hydraulic sealers.

Authors:  Mira Kebudi Benezra; Pierre Schembri Wismayer; Josette Camilleri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comparison of Dentinal Tubule Penetration between a Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer with Ultrasonic Activation and an Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer: A Study Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.

Authors:  Dani Song; Sung-Eun Yang
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-10-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.