INTRODUCTION: Many injuries experienced by soldiers can be attributed to the occupational loads they are required to carry. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether contemporary military load carriage is a source of injuries to Australian Regular Army soldiers and to profile these injuries. METHODS: The Australian Defence Force 'Occupational Health, Safety and Compensation Analysis and Reporting' database was searched to identify all reported injuries sustained during load carriage events. Key search terms were employed and narrative description fields were interrogated to increase data accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 1,954 injury records were extracted from the database. Of these, 404 injuries were attributed to load carriage. The majority of these load carriage injuries involved either the lower limb or back, with bones and joints accounting for the most frequently reported body structures to be injured. Field activities were the leading activities being performed at the time that load carriage injuries occurred, and muscular stress was identified as the mechanism of injury for over half of reported load carriage injuries. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that load carriage is a substantial source of injury risk to Australian Army soldiers. Physical training may fail to adequately prepare soldiers for load carriage tasks during field training exercises.
INTRODUCTION: Many injuries experienced by soldiers can be attributed to the occupational loads they are required to carry. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether contemporary military load carriage is a source of injuries to Australian Regular Army soldiers and to profile these injuries. METHODS: The Australian Defence Force 'Occupational Health, Safety and Compensation Analysis and Reporting' database was searched to identify all reported injuries sustained during load carriage events. Key search terms were employed and narrative description fields were interrogated to increase data accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 1,954 injury records were extracted from the database. Of these, 404 injuries were attributed to load carriage. The majority of these load carriage injuries involved either the lower limb or back, with bones and joints accounting for the most frequently reported body structures to be injured. Field activities were the leading activities being performed at the time that load carriage injuries occurred, and muscular stress was identified as the mechanism of injury for over half of reported load carriage injuries. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that load carriage is a substantial source of injury risk to Australian Army soldiers. Physical training may fail to adequately prepare soldiers for load carriage tasks during field training exercises.
Authors: Robert Carter; Samuel N Cheuvront; Jeffrey O Williams; Margaret A Kolka; Lou A Stephenson; Michael N Sawka; Paul J Amoroso Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Marcus K Taylor; Lisa M Hernández; Pinata H Sessoms; Colton Kawamura; John J Fraser Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Robin Orr; Danny Maupin; Robert Palmer; Elisa F D Canetti; Vini Simas; Ben Schram Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-27 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Bernard X W Liew; Susan Morris; Justin W L Keogh; Brendyn Appleby; Kevin Netto Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-10-22 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Kaitlin D Lyons; Aaron G Parks; Oluwagbemiga Dadematthews; Nilophar Zandieh; Paige McHenry; Kenneth E Games; Michael D Goodlett; William Murrah; Jaimie Roper; JoEllen M Sefton Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 3.390