Amanda Richardson1, Ollie Ganz2, Jennifer Pearson3, Nathalie Celcis2, Donna Vallone1, Andrea C Villanti3. 1. Department of Research and Evaluation, Legacy, Washington DC, USA Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Research and Evaluation, Legacy, Washington DC, USA. 3. Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Legacy, Washington DC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite declines in overall US cigarette consumption, the menthol cigarette market share has increased in recent years. Advertising contributes to menthol initiation and use, but little has been done to characterise menthol cigarette advertising outside of the point of sale. METHODS: Two full-service advertising firms were used to develop a library of menthol cigarette advertisements (ads) over a 9-month period (June 2012-February 2013) in the USA. The volume of ads, media channel (direct mail, print, online, email), estimated spend and households reached was summarised overall and by brand in 2013. Direct mail, email and print ads were coded for content and the target audience of print publications was examined. RESULTS: Over the study period, 205 menthol cigarette ads were identified with estimated expenditures exceeding US$31 million, with 70% spent on direct mail ads. Over 90% of ads promoted Camel, Marlboro and Newport menthol cigarettes. A majority (87%) of direct mail ads contained coupons or other incentives known to appeal to price-sensitive customers. Only two brands' print ads appeared during this period: Newport ads focused on themes of sociability and sexuality, and were placed in magazines targeting African-Americans and younger consumers; American Spirit print ads were placed in general interest magazines and predominantly stressed the 'natural' aspects of their brand. DISCUSSION: The tobacco industry continues to spend millions of dollars promoting menthol cigarettes through channels that preferentially target vulnerable subgroups, such as African-Americans and younger consumers. Public health campaigns to educate and combat the influence of menthol advertising are needed. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
BACKGROUND: Despite declines in overall US cigarette consumption, the menthol cigarette market share has increased in recent years. Advertising contributes to menthol initiation and use, but little has been done to characterise menthol cigarette advertising outside of the point of sale. METHODS: Two full-service advertising firms were used to develop a library of menthol cigarette advertisements (ads) over a 9-month period (June 2012-February 2013) in the USA. The volume of ads, media channel (direct mail, print, online, email), estimated spend and households reached was summarised overall and by brand in 2013. Direct mail, email and print ads were coded for content and the target audience of print publications was examined. RESULTS: Over the study period, 205 menthol cigarette ads were identified with estimated expenditures exceeding US$31 million, with 70% spent on direct mail ads. Over 90% of ads promoted Camel, Marlboro and Newport menthol cigarettes. A majority (87%) of direct mail ads contained coupons or other incentives known to appeal to price-sensitive customers. Only two brands' print ads appeared during this period: Newport ads focused on themes of sociability and sexuality, and were placed in magazines targeting African-Americans and younger consumers; American Spirit print ads were placed in general interest magazines and predominantly stressed the 'natural' aspects of their brand. DISCUSSION: The tobacco industry continues to spend millions of dollars promoting menthol cigarettes through channels that preferentially target vulnerable subgroups, such as African-Americans and younger consumers. Public health campaigns to educate and combat the influence of menthol advertising are needed. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Entities:
Keywords:
Advertising and Promotion; Media; Surveillance and monitoring; Tobacco industry
Authors: Nichole T Tanner; Nina A Thomas; Ralph Ward; Alana Rojewski; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Benjamin A Toll; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: Chest Date: 2020-06-27 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Emily T Hébert; Elizabeth A Vandewater; Michael S Businelle; Melissa B Harrell; Steven H Kelder; Cheryl L Perry Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Laura R Stroud; Chrystal Vergara-Lopez; Meaghan McCallum; Allison E Gaffey; Alana Corey; Raymond Niaura Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Krysten W Bold; Peter Jatlow; Lisa M Fucito; Tore Eid; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Stephanie O'Malley Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Darcy E Lockhart; Ashley E Strahley; Rachel N Cassidy; Eric C Donny; Richard J O'Connor; Jennifer W Tidey Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 4.492