Literature DB >> 25178118

Statins for acute coronary syndrome.

Noah Vale1, Alain J Nordmann, Gregory G Schwartz, James de Lemos, Furio Colivicchi, Frank den Hartog, Petr Ostadal, Stella M Macin, Anho H Liem, Edward J Mills, Neera Bhatnagar, Heiner C Bucher, Matthias Briel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The early period following the onset of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents a critical stage of coronary heart disease, with a high risk of recurrent events and deaths. The short-term effects of early treatment with statins on patient-relevant outcomes in patients suffering from ACS are unclear. This is an update of a review previously published in 2011.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects, both harms and benefits, of early administered statins in patients with ACS, in terms of mortality and cardiovascular events. SEARCH
METHODS: We updated the searches of CENTRAL (2013, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid) (1946 to April Week 1 2013), EMBASE (Ovid) (1947 to 2013 Week 14), and CINAHL (EBSCO) (1938 to 2013) on 12 April 2013. We applied no language restrictions. We supplemented the search by contacting experts in the field, by reviewing the reference lists of reviews and editorials on the topic, and by searching trial registries. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing statins with placebo or usual care, with initiation of statin therapy within 14 days following the onset of ACS, follow-up of at least 30 days, and reporting at least one clinical outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for all outcomes in the treatment and control groups and pooled data using random-effects models. MAIN
RESULTS: Eighteen studies (14,303 patients) compared early statin treatment versus placebo or no treatment in patients with ACS. The new search did not identify any new studies for inclusion. There were some concerns about risk of bias and imprecision of summary estimates. Based on moderate quality evidence, early statin therapy did not decrease the combined primary outcome of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke at one month (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.08) or four months (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.06) of follow-up when compared to placebo or no treatment. There were no statistically significant risk reductions from statins for total death, total myocardial infarction, total stroke, cardiovascular death, revascularization procedures, and acute heart failure at one month or at four months, although there were favorable trends related to statin use for each of these endpoints. Moderate quality evidence suggests that the incidence of unstable angina was significantly reduced at four months following ACS (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96). There were nine individuals with myopathy (elevated creatinine kinase levels more than 10 times the upper limit of normal) in statin-treated patients (0.13%) versus one (0.015%) in the control groups. Serious muscle toxicity was mostly limited to patients treated with simvastatin 80 mg. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Based on moderate quality evidence, due to concerns about risk of bias and imprecision, initiation of statin therapy within 14 days following ACS does not reduce death, myocardial infarction, or stroke up to four months, but reduces the occurrence of unstable angina at four months following ACS. Serious side effects were rare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25178118     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006870.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  12 in total

Review 1.  The Treatment of Disorders of Lipid Metabolism.

Authors:  Klaus G Parhofer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease treated in different therapy units at department of cardiology: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cong Fu; Yuyu Yao; Xin Wang; Chaojun Yu; Genshan Ma
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 3.  Cholesterol confusion and statin controversy.

Authors:  Robert DuBroff; Michel de Lorgeril
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-26

4.  An assessment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for non-communicable diseases (NCDs): more and higher quality research is required in less developed countries.

Authors:  Hong Fan; Fujian Song
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Cardiovascular diseases in mega-countries: the challenges of the nutrition, physical activity and epidemiologic transitions, and the double burden of disease.

Authors:  Simon Barquera; Andrea Pedroza-Tobias; Catalina Medina
Journal:  Curr Opin Lipidol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.776

6.  Statins Reduce Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Cytokine and Inflammatory Mediator Release in an In Vitro Model of Microglial-Like Cells.

Authors:  A J McFarland; A K Davey; S Anoopkumar-Dukie
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.711

7.  Risk of mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes on high intensity statin treatment.

Authors:  J Rockberg; L Jørgensen; B Taylor; P Sobocki; G Johansson
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2017-03-18

Review 8.  Reduction of Vascular Inflammation, LDL-C, or Both for the Protection from Cardiovascular Events?

Authors:  Andromachi Reklou; Michael Doumas; Konstantinos Imprialos; Konstantinos Stavropoulos; Dimitris Patoulias; Vasilios G Athyros
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2018-03-30

Review 9.  High-intensity statin therapy yields better outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients: a meta-analysis involving 26,497 patients.

Authors:  Shiyong Yu; Jun Jin; Zhongxiu Chen; Xiaolu Luo
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Moderate Renal Impairment Does Not Impact the Ability of CSL112 (Apolipoprotein A-I [Human]) to Enhance Cholesterol Efflux Capacity.

Authors:  Andreas Gille; Danielle Duffy; Michael A Tortorici; Samuel D Wright; Lawrence I Deckelbaum; Denise M D'Andrea
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.126

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.