| Literature DB >> 25177294 |
Ioannis Ugo Isaias1, Jörg Spiegel2, Joachim Brumberg3, Kelly P Cosgrove4, Giorgio Marotta5, Naoya Oishi6, Takahiro Higuchi3, Sebastian Küsters3, Markus Schiller3, Ulrich Dillmann2, Christopher H van Dyck4, Andreas Buck3, Ken Herrmann3, Susanne Schloegl3, Jens Volkmann1, Michael Lassmann3, Klaus Fassbender2, Reinhard Lorenz3, Samuel Samnick3.
Abstract
We investigated in vivo brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) distribution in cognitively intact subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) at an early stage of the disease. Fourteen patients and 13 healthy subjects were imaged with single photon emission computed tomography and the radiotracer 5-[(123)I]iodo-3-[2(S)-2-azetidinylmethoxy]pyridine ([(123)I]5IA). Patients were selected according to several criteria, including short duration of motor signs (<7 years) and normal scores at an extensive neuropsychological evaluation. In PD patients, nAChR density was significantly higher in the putamen, the insular cortex and the supplementary motor area and lower in the caudate nucleus, the orbitofrontal cortex, and the middle temporal gyrus. Disease duration positively correlated with nAChR density in the putamen ipsilateral (ρ = 0.56, p < 0.05) but not contralateral (ρ = 0.49, p = 0.07) to the clinically most affected hemibody. We observed, for the first time in vivo, higher nAChR density in brain regions of the motor and limbic basal ganglia circuits of subjects with PD. Our findings support the notion of an up-regulated cholinergic activity at the striatal and possibly cortical level in cognitively intact PD patients at an early stage of disease.Entities:
Keywords: 5IA-SPECT; Parkinson disease; cognitive decline; dopamine acetylcholine; nicotinic receptors
Year: 2014 PMID: 25177294 PMCID: PMC4132266 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Figure 1Binding values of nAChRs of the caudate nucleus and putamen of PD patients and HC. Compared to controls, nAChRs density was bilaterally lower in the caudate nucleus (p < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) and higher in the putamen of PD patients (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). No significant difference was found when comparing ipsilateral and contralateral (or left and right) side, both in patients and controls. Contralateral refers to the side opposite to the clinically most affected hemibody. Right is conventionally contralateral for HC.
Binding values of nAChRs.
| PD | HC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Putamen C | 1.36 ± 0.10 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | <0.0001 |
| Putamen I | 1.37 ± 0.13 | 1.09 ± 0.09 | <0.0001 |
| Caudate C | 0.86 ± 0.12 | 1.04 ± 0.15 | <0.01 |
| Caudate I | 0.81 ± 0.20 | 1.11 ± 0.21 | <0.01 |
| Thalamus C | 1.68 ± 0.23 | 1.67 ± 0.18 | 0.46 |
| Thalamus I | 1.62 ± 0.24 | 1.68 ± 0.20 | 1.00 |
| Sensorimotor L | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 1.05 ± 0.09 | 0.40 |
| Sensorimotor R | 1.02 ± 0.07 | 1.02 ± 0.08 | 0.88 |
| Frontal lobe L | 0.93 ± 0.06 | 0.95 ± 0.08 | 0.19 |
| Frontal lobe R | 0.92 ± 0.06 | 0.95 ± 0.09 | 0.11 |
| Orbitofrontal L | 0.85 ± 0.08 | 1.00 ± 0.11 | <0.001 |
| Orbitofrontal R | 0.83 ± 0.10 | 1.00 ± 0.10 | <0.001 |
| Temporal lobe L | 0.97 ± 0.05 | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 0.73 |
| Temporal lobe R | 0.94 ± 0.05 | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 0.05 |
| Parieto-temporal L | 1.00 ± 0.04 | 0.90 ± 0.07 | 0.16 |
| Parieto-temporal R | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 0.43 |
| Insular cortex L | 1.13 ± 0.09 | 0.95 ± 0.09 | <0.001 |
| Insular cortex R | 1.13 ± 0.10 | 0.91 ± 0.07 | <0.001 |
| Gyrus cinguli L | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 0.88 ± 0.10 | 0.16 |
| Gyrus cinguli R | 0.86 ± 0.09 | 0.90 ± 0.10 | 0.40 |
| Occipital L | 0.89 ± 0.05 | 0.86 ± 0.08 | 0.05 |
| Occipital R | 0.87 ± 0.05 | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 0.38 |
| Cerebellum cortex L | 1.01 ± 0.06 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.22 |
| Cerebellum cortex R | 1.01 ± 0.06 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.30 |
| Cerebellum white matter L | 1.12 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.04 | 0.17 |
| Cerebellum white matter R | 1.16 ± 0.07 | 1.10 ± 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Pons and midbrain | 1.33 ± 0.13 | 1.34 ± 0.09 | 0.69 |
For the striatum and thalamus only we listed the binding values of contralateral (C) and ipsilateral (I) with respect to the clinically most affected hemibody. For healthy controls, left hemibody refers conventionally to ipsilateral. Other brain regions are listed as left (L) and right (R). .
Brain regions of significantly correlation between the voxel-by-voxel [.
| Region – Brodmann area | Coordinate (Talairach) | |
|---|---|---|
| R precentral gyrus – BA6 | 24, −18, 68 | 5.22 |
| R middle frontal gyrus – BA6 | 32, −1, 57 | 5.12 |
| R caudate nucleus | 4, 7, 12 | 4.82 |
| L middle frontal gyrus – BA11 | −28, 41, −9 | 5.41 |
| L middle temporal gyrus – BA21 | −64, −12, −7 | 6.00 |
| −56, −2, −15 | 4.84 | |
| −53, −22, −13 | 5.97 | |
Figure 2Statistical parametric mapping results. Group contrast giving relative increase (A) or decrease (B) in [123I]5IA uptake in PD patients applying the proportional scaling global mean, thresholded at p < 0.05 and corrected for FWE.