Feng Hua Ma1, Song Qi Cai1, Jin Wei Qiang1, Shu Hui Zhao1, Guo Fu Zhang2, Ya Min Rao2. 1. Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Pathology, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare potential discriminatory magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) and primary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI features (the laterality, shape, size, signal intensity, enhancement of solid portion, amount of ascites, peritoneal planting, lymph nodes, or distant metastasis) of 27 tumors in 23 patients with PFTC confirmed by surgery and pathology were compared with 42 tumors in 37 patients with EOC. RESULTS: The mean maximum diameter was 6.1 ± 0.7 cm in PFTC versus 10.2 ± 0.6 cm in EOC. MRI features of PFTC were sausage-like shape (19/27, 70%), or irregular (8/27, 30%) shape; solid (20/27, 74%) or cystic-solid (7/27, 26%) mass; homogeneous (21/27, 78%) or heterogeneous (6/27, 22%) signal on T2 -weighted images; mild (8/27, 30%), moderate (13/27, 48%), or prominent (6/27, 22%) enhancement; associated hydrosalpinx (13/27, 48%) or intrauterine fluid accumulation (7/23, 30%). Significant differences between PFTC and EOC were found in the size, shape, configuration, signal homogeneity, and enhancement pattern, associated hydrosalpinx, and intrauterine fluid accumulation (P < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.015, 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: PFTC often appears as a small-sized solid mass, with a sausage-like shape, homogeneous signal, mild or moderate enhancement, hydrosalpinx, or intrauterine fluid accumulation. Our preliminary study shows that MRI can identify the characteristic features of PFTC and differentiate PFTC from EOC.
PURPOSE: To compare potential discriminatory magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) and primary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI features (the laterality, shape, size, signal intensity, enhancement of solid portion, amount of ascites, peritoneal planting, lymph nodes, or distant metastasis) of 27 tumors in 23 patients with PFTC confirmed by surgery and pathology were compared with 42 tumors in 37 patients with EOC. RESULTS: The mean maximum diameter was 6.1 ± 0.7 cm in PFTC versus 10.2 ± 0.6 cm in EOC. MRI features of PFTC were sausage-like shape (19/27, 70%), or irregular (8/27, 30%) shape; solid (20/27, 74%) or cystic-solid (7/27, 26%) mass; homogeneous (21/27, 78%) or heterogeneous (6/27, 22%) signal on T2 -weighted images; mild (8/27, 30%), moderate (13/27, 48%), or prominent (6/27, 22%) enhancement; associated hydrosalpinx (13/27, 48%) or intrauterine fluid accumulation (7/23, 30%). Significant differences between PFTC and EOC were found in the size, shape, configuration, signal homogeneity, and enhancement pattern, associated hydrosalpinx, and intrauterine fluid accumulation (P < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.015, 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION:PFTC often appears as a small-sized solid mass, with a sausage-like shape, homogeneous signal, mild or moderate enhancement, hydrosalpinx, or intrauterine fluid accumulation. Our preliminary study shows that MRI can identify the characteristic features of PFTC and differentiate PFTC from EOC.
Authors: Pietro Valerio Foti; Massimo Tonolini; Valeria Costanzo; Luca Mammino; Stefano Palmucci; Antonio Cianci; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre; Antonio Basile Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2019-12-20