Literature DB >> 25174772

R-CHOP or R-HyperCVAD with or without autologous stem cell transplantation for older patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

Zachary Frosch1, Marlise R Luskin2, Daniel J Landsburg2, Stephen J Schuster2, Jakub Svoboda2, Alison W Loren2, David L Porter2, Edward A Stadtmauer2, Sunita D Nasta3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although intensive induction and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) prolong survival in younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), benefit in older patients remains uncertain because data supporting these approaches come almost exclusively from younger cohorts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed outcomes for 38 patients with MCL aged ≥ 60 years who received R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) (n = 19) or R-HyperCVAD (rituximab plus hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine) (n = 19) with or without ASCT.
RESULTS: Median progression-free survival (PFS) of R-CHOP + ASCT (3.2 years) and R-HyperCVAD alone (4.0 years) was longer than that for R-CHOP alone (1.6 years; P = .013 and P = .009, respectively). R-CHOP + ASCT and R-HyperCVAD resulted in similar PFS (P = .66). R-HyperCVAD induction led to a higher incidence of toxicity, including therapy discontinuation and need for transfusions, compared with R-CHOP, although rates of adverse events were similar for R-HyperCVAD alone and R-CHOP + ASCT.
CONCLUSION: R-CHOP alone is less effective therapy for fit older patients with MCL. Intensifying therapy with R-HyperCVAD induction or ASCT consolidation after R-CHOP is associated with prolonged PFS and similar rates of toxicity. Consideration should be given to individual preferences regarding the differing method of administration and relative timing of toxicity with each regimen.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Non-Hodgkin lymphoma; Survival; Toxicity; Treatment outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25174772     DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk        ISSN: 2152-2669


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current and emerging treatment options for mantle cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Bita Fakhri; Brad Kahl
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2017-07-07

Review 2.  Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Which Patients Should We Transplant?

Authors:  James N Gerson; Stefan K Barta
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 3.  High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Older Patients with Lymphoma.

Authors:  Oscar B Lahoud; Craig S Sauter; Paul A Hamlin; Parastoo Bahrami Dahi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Frontline Treatment for Older Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Haige Ye; Aakash Desai; Dongfeng Zeng; Jorge Romaguera; Michael L Wang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-06-12

5.  Association between quality of response and outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma receiving VR-CAP versus R-CHOP in the phase 3 LYM-3002 study.

Authors:  Gregor Verhoef; Tadeusz Robak; Huiqiang Huang; Halyna Pylypenko; Noppadol Siritanaratkul; Juliana Pereira; Johannes Drach; Jiri Mayer; Rumiko Okamoto; Lixia Pei; Brendan Rooney; Andrew Cakana; Helgi van de Velde; Franco Cavalli
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  SAMHD1 Mutations and Expression in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Wenqin Yue; Gusheng Tang; Mingyu Ye; Jiechen Yu; Bin Liu; Lijuan Jiao; Xuefei Liu; Shuyi Yin; Jie Chen; Lei Gao; Jianmin Yang; Miaoxia He
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.