Joseph M Cerimele1, Abigail C Halperin2, Clarence Spigner3, Anna Ratzliff4, Wayne J Katon4. 1. University of Washington School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: cerimele@uw.edu. 2. University of Washington School of Public Health Department of Health Services, Seattle, WA, USA; University of Washington School of Medicine Department of Family Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. University of Washington School of Public Health Department of Health Services, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. University of Washington School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand collaborative care psychiatric consultants' views and practices on making the diagnosis of and recommending treatment for bipolar disorder in primary care using collaborative care. METHOD: We conducted a focus group at the University of Washington in December 2013 with nine psychiatric consultants working in primary-care-based collaborative care in Washington State. A grounded theory approach with open coding and the constant comparative method revealed categories where emergent themes were saturated and validated through member checking, and a conceptual model was developed. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged from the data including the importance of working as a collaborative care team, the strengths of collaborative care for treating bipolar disorder and the need for psychiatric consultants to adapt specialty psychiatric clinical skills to the primary care setting. Other discussion topics included gathering clinical data from multiple sources over time, balancing risks and benefits of treating patients indirectly, tracking patient care outcomes with a registry and effective care. CONCLUSION: Experienced psychiatric consultants working in collaborative care teams provided their perceptions regarding treating patients with bipolar illness including identifying ways to adapt specialty psychiatric skills, developing techniques for providing team-based care and perceiving the care delivered through collaborative care as high quality.
OBJECTIVE: To understand collaborative care psychiatric consultants' views and practices on making the diagnosis of and recommending treatment for bipolar disorder in primary care using collaborative care. METHOD: We conducted a focus group at the University of Washington in December 2013 with nine psychiatric consultants working in primary-care-based collaborative care in Washington State. A grounded theory approach with open coding and the constant comparative method revealed categories where emergent themes were saturated and validated through member checking, and a conceptual model was developed. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged from the data including the importance of working as a collaborative care team, the strengths of collaborative care for treating bipolar disorder and the need for psychiatric consultants to adapt specialty psychiatric clinical skills to the primary care setting. Other discussion topics included gathering clinical data from multiple sources over time, balancing risks and benefits of treating patients indirectly, tracking patient care outcomes with a registry and effective care. CONCLUSION: Experienced psychiatric consultants working in collaborative care teams provided their perceptions regarding treating patients with bipolar illness including identifying ways to adapt specialty psychiatric skills, developing techniques for providing team-based care and perceiving the care delivered through collaborative care as high quality.
Authors: R M Hirschfeld; J B Williams; R L Spitzer; J R Calabrese; L Flynn; P E Keck; L Lewis; S L McElroy; R M Post; D J Rapport; J M Russell; G S Sachs; J Zajecka Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Gregory E Simon; Evette J Ludman; Jürgen Unützer; Mark S Bauer; Belinda Operskalski; Carolyn Rutter Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Murray B Stein; Cathy D Sherbourne; Michelle G Craske; Adrienne Means-Christensen; Alexander Bystritsky; Wayne Katon; Greer Sullivan; Peter P Roy-Byrne Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; Jack R Cornelius; Xiaoyan Han; Harold A Pincus; Mujeeb Shad; Ihsan Salloum; Joseph Conigliaro; Gretchen L Haas Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Joseph M Cerimele; Ya-Fen Chan; Lydia A Chwastiak; Marc Avery; Wayne Katon; Jürgen Unützer Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 3.084