K Nielsen1, H J Scheffer2, J M Vieveen3, A A J M van Tilborg2, S Meijer1, C van Kuijk2, M P van den Tol1, M R Meijerink2, R A Bouwman4. 1. Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Anaesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven ra.bouwman@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel tumour ablation technique involving repetitive application of electrical energy around a tumour. The use of pulsed electrical gradients carries a risk of cardiac arrhythmias, severe muscle contractions, and seizures. We aimed to identify IRE-related risks and the appropriate precautions for anaesthetic management. METHODS: All patients who were treated with IRE were prospectively included. Exclusion criteria were arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, active coronary artery disease, and epilepsy. All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia with complete muscle relaxation during ECG-synchronized pulsing. Adverse events, cardiovascular effects, blood samples, cerebral activity, and post-procedural pain were analysed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent 30 IRE sessions for tumours in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and lesser pelvis. No major adverse events occurred during IRE. Median systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased by 44 mm Hg (range -7 to 108 mm Hg) and 19 mm Hg (range 1-50 mm Hg), respectively. Two transient minor cardiac arrhythmias without haemodynamic consequences were observed. Muscle contractions were mild and IRE caused no reactive brain activity on a simplified EEG. Pain in the first 24 h after percutaneous IRE was generally mild, but higher pain scores were reported after pancreatic treatment (mean VAS score 3; range 0-9). CONCLUSIONS: Side-effects during IRE on tumours in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and lesser pelvis seem mild and manageable when current recommendations for anaesthesia management, including deep muscle relaxation and ECG synchronized pulsing, are followed. Electrical pulses do not seem to cause reactive cerebral activity and evidence for pre-existing atrial fibrillation as an absolute contra-indication for IRE is questionable.
BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel tumour ablation technique involving repetitive application of electrical energy around a tumour. The use of pulsed electrical gradients carries a risk of cardiac arrhythmias, severe muscle contractions, and seizures. We aimed to identify IRE-related risks and the appropriate precautions for anaesthetic management. METHODS: All patients who were treated with IRE were prospectively included. Exclusion criteria were arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, active coronary artery disease, and epilepsy. All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia with complete muscle relaxation during ECG-synchronized pulsing. Adverse events, cardiovascular effects, blood samples, cerebral activity, and post-procedural pain were analysed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent 30 IRE sessions for tumours in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and lesser pelvis. No major adverse events occurred during IRE. Median systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased by 44 mm Hg (range -7 to 108 mm Hg) and 19 mm Hg (range 1-50 mm Hg), respectively. Two transient minor cardiac arrhythmias without haemodynamic consequences were observed. Muscle contractions were mild and IRE caused no reactive brain activity on a simplified EEG. Pain in the first 24 h after percutaneous IRE was generally mild, but higher pain scores were reported after pancreatic treatment (mean VAS score 3; range 0-9). CONCLUSIONS: Side-effects during IRE on tumours in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and lesser pelvis seem mild and manageable when current recommendations for anaesthesia management, including deep muscle relaxation and ECG synchronized pulsing, are followed. Electrical pulses do not seem to cause reactive cerebral activity and evidence for pre-existing atrial fibrillation as an absolute contra-indication for IRE is questionable.
Authors: Russell C Langan; Debra A Goldman; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Peter J Allen; Vinod P Balachandran; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Mara Buijs; Daniel M de Bruin; Peter Gk Wagstaff; Patricia J Zondervan; Matthijs JV Scheltema; Marc W Engelbrecht; Maria P Laguna; Krijn P van Lienden Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2021-09 Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Peter G K Wagstaff; Daniel M de Bruin; Patricia J Zondervan; C Dilara Savci Heijink; Marc R W Engelbrecht; Otto M van Delden; Ton G van Leeuwen; Hessel Wijkstra; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; M Pilar Laguna Pes Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-03-22 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: P Sánchez-Velázquez; Q Castellví; A Villanueva; R Quesada; C Pañella; M Cáceres; D Dorcaratto; A Andaluz; X Moll; M Trujillo; J M Burdío; E Berjano; L Grande; A Ivorra; F Burdío Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Peter Gk Wagstaff; Mara Buijs; Willemien van den Bos; Daniel M de Bruin; Patricia J Zondervan; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; M Pilar Laguna Pes Journal: Onco Targets Ther Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 4.147