Literature DB >> 25172871

The cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay as a strong predictor of lung cancer: extension of a lung cancer risk prediction model.

Randa A El-Zein1, Mirtha S Lopez2, Anthony M D'Amelio2, Mei Liu3, Reginald F Munden4, David Christiani5, Li Su5, Paula Tejera-Alveraz5, Rihong Zhai5, Margaret R Spitz6, Carol J Etzel3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to improve lung cancer outcome by identifying and validating markers of risk. We previously reported that the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay (CBMN) is a strong predictor of lung cancer risk. Here, we validate our findings in an independent external lung cancer population and test discriminatory power improvement of the Spitz risk prediction model upon extension with this biomarker.
METHODS: A total of 1,506 participants were stratified into a test set of 995 (527 cases/468 controls) from MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) and a validation set of 511 (239 cases/272 controls) from Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA). An epidemiologic questionnaire was administered and genetic instability was assessed using the CBMN assay.
RESULTS: Excellent concordance was observed between the two populations in levels and distribution of CBMN endpoints [binucleated-micronuclei (BN-MN), binucleated-nucleoplasmic bridges (BN-NPB)] with significantly higher mean BN-MN and BN-NPB values among cases (P < 0.0001). Extension of the Spitz model led to an overall improvement in the AUC (95% confidence intervals) from 0.61 (55.5-65.7) with epidemiologic variables to 0.92 (89.4-94.2) with addition of the BN-MN endpoint. The most dramatic improvement was observed with the never-smokers extended model followed by the former and current smokers.
CONCLUSIONS: The CBMN assay is a sensitive and specific predictor of lung cancer risk, and extension of the Spitz risk prediction model led to an AUC that may prove useful in population screening programs to identify the "true" high-risk individuals. IMPACT: Identifying high-risk subgroups that would benefit from screening surveillance has immense public health significance. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25172871      PMCID: PMC4487661          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  40 in total

Review 1.  The less harmful cigarette: a controversial issue. a tribute to Ernst L. Wynder.

Authors:  D Hoffmann; I Hoffmann; K El-Bayoumy
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 2.  Chromosomal biomarkers of genomic instability relevant to cancer.

Authors:  Michael Fenech
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes predict human cancer independently of exposure to carcinogens. European Study Group on Cytogenetic Biomarkers and Health.

Authors:  S Bonassi; L Hagmar; U Strömberg; A H Montagud; H Tinnerberg; A Forni; P Heikkilä; S Wanders; P Wilhardt; I L Hansteen; L E Knudsen; H Norppa
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay in WIL2-NS cells: a sensitive system to detect chromosomal damage induced by reactive oxygen species and activated human neutrophils.

Authors:  K Umegaki; M Fenech
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Variations in lung cancer risk among smokers.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Mark D Thornquist; Mark G Kris; Ramsey C Tate; Matt J Barnett; Lillian J Hsieh; Colin B Begg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Cigarette smoking and bronchial carcinoma: dose and time relationships among regular smokers and lifelong non-smokers.

Authors:  R Doll; R Peto
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health (1978)       Date:  1978-12

7.  HUMN project: detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures.

Authors:  M Fenech; W P Chang; M Kirsch-Volders; N Holland; S Bonassi; E Zeiger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-01-10       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  Biomarkers of genetic damage for cancer epidemiology.

Authors:  Michael Fenech
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 9.  Chromosomal aberrations and risk of cancer in humans: an epidemiologic perspective.

Authors:  S Bonassi; A Znaor; H Norppa; L Hagmar
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

10.  Risk of cancer in an occupationally exposed cohort with increased level of chromosomal aberrations.

Authors:  Z Smerhovsky; K Landa; P Rössner; M Brabec; Z Zudova; N Hola; Z Pokorna; J Mareckova; D Hurychova
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  12 in total

1.  Therapeutic effects of statins on chromosomal DNA damage of dyslipidemic patients.

Authors:  Hamiyet Donmez-Altuntas; Fahri Bayram; Ayse N Coskun-Demirkalp; Osman Baspınar; Derya Kocer; Peter P Toth
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-08-19

2.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among lung cancer-free smokers: The importance of healthy controls.

Authors:  Michelle D Karpman; Ronald Eldridge; Jack L Follis; Carol J Etzel; Sanjay Shete; Randa A El-Zein
Journal:  Respir Investig       Date:  2017-12-06

3.  Should Never-Smokers at Increased Risk for Lung Cancer Be Screened?

Authors:  Kevin Ten Haaf; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  Mitotic Spindle Apparatus Abnormalities in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Cells: A Potential Pathway to Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jose Thaiparambil; Lingyun Dong; Diana Jasso; Jian-An Huang; Randa A El-Zein
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-07-12

5.  Applying Risk Prediction Models to Optimize Lung Cancer Screening: Current Knowledge, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lori C Sakoda; Louise M Henderson; Tanner J Caverly; Karen J Wernli; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-24

6.  Increased Chromosomal and Oxidative DNA Damage in Patients with Multinodular Goiter and Their Association with Cancer.

Authors:  Hamiyet Donmez-Altuntas; Fahri Bayram; Nazmiye Bitgen; Sibel Ata; Zuhal Hamurcu; Gulden Baskol
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.257

7.  Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study.

Authors:  Kevin Ten Haaf; Jihyoun Jeon; Martin C Tammemägi; Summer S Han; Chung Yin Kong; Sylvia K Plevritis; Eric J Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Ewout W Steyerberg; Rafael Meza
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Ultrastructural changes during lung carcinogenesis-modulation by curcumin and quercetin.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Lei Wang; Hao Zhang; Ke Li; Jiqin You
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Risk prediction model for lung cancer incorporating metabolic markers: Development and internal validation in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Zhangyan Lyu; Ni Li; Shuohua Chen; Gang Wang; Fengwei Tan; Xiaoshuang Feng; Xin Li; Yan Wen; Zhuoyu Yang; Yalong Wang; Jiang Li; Hongda Chen; Chunqing Lin; Jiansong Ren; Jufang Shi; Shouling Wu; Min Dai; Jie He
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  The cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay as a novel biomarker for selection of lung cancer screening participants.

Authors:  Randa A El-Zein; Carol J Etzel; Reginald F Munden
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.