Literature DB >> 25172431

Co-regulation of invected and engrailed by a complex array of regulatory sequences in Drosophila.

Yuzhong Cheng1, Alayne L Brunner1, Stefanie Kremer1, Sarah K DeVido1, Catherine M Stefaniuk1, Judith A Kassis2.   

Abstract

invected (inv) and engrailed (en) form a gene complex that extends about 115 kb. These two genes encode highly related homeodomain proteins that are co-regulated in a complex manner throughout development. Our dissection of inv/en regulatory DNA shows that most enhancers are spread throughout a 62 kb region. We used two types of constructs to analyze the function of this DNA: P-element based reporter constructs with small pieces of DNA fused to the en promoter driving lacZ expression and large constructs with HA-tagged en and inv inserted in the genome with the phiC31 system. In addition, we generated deletions of inv and en DNA in situ and assayed their effects on inv/en expression. Our results support and extend our knowledge of inv/en regulation. First, inv and en share regulatory DNA, most of which is flanking the en transcription unit. In support of this, a 79-kb HA-en transgene can rescue inv en double mutants to viable, fertile adults. In contrast, an 84-kb HA-inv transgene lacks most of the enhancers for inv/en expression. Second, there are multiple enhancers for inv/en stripes in embryos; some of these may be redundant but others play discrete roles at different stages of embryonic development. Finally, no small reporter construct gave expression in the posterior compartment of imaginal discs, a hallmark of inv/en expression. Robust expression of HA-en in the posterior compartment of imaginal discs is evident from the 79-kb HA-en transgene, while a 45-kb HA-en transgene gives weaker, variable imaginal disc expression. We suggest that the activity of the imaginal disc enhancer(s) is dependent on the chromatin structure of the inv/en domain. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhancers; Gene expression; Gene regulation; Segmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25172431      PMCID: PMC4189978          DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  39 in total

1.  The evolution of hexapod engrailed-family genes: evidence for conservation and concerted evolution.

Authors:  Andrew D Peel; Maximilian J Telford; Michael Akam
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The role of Polycomb-group response elements in regulation of engrailed transcription in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sarah K DeVido; Deborah Kwon; J Lesley Brown; Judith A Kassis
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Enhancer-promoter communication at the Drosophila engrailed locus.

Authors:  Deborah Kwon; Diane Mucci; Kristofor K Langlais; Jeffrey L Americo; Sarah K DeVido; Yuzhong Cheng; Judith A Kassis
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  The Drosophila engrailed and invected genes: partners in regulation, expression and function.

Authors:  E Gustavson; A S Goldsborough; Z Ali; T B Kornberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Shadow enhancers foster robustness of Drosophila gastrulation.

Authors:  Michael W Perry; Alistair N Boettiger; Jacques P Bothma; Michael Levine
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Imaginal disc silencers from Ultrabithorax: evidence for Polycomb response elements.

Authors:  B Christen; M Bienz
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.882

7.  Multiple modular promoter elements drive graded brinker expression in response to the Dpp morphogen gradient.

Authors:  Li-Chin Yao; Sopheap Phin; Jane Cho; Christine Rushlow; Kavita Arora; Rahul Warrior
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers.

Authors:  Nicolás Frankel; Gregory K Davis; Diego Vargas; Shu Wang; François Payre; David L Stern
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions.

Authors:  Stewart MacArthur; Xiao-Yong Li; Jingyi Li; James B Brown; Hou Cheng Chu; Lucy Zeng; Brandi P Grondona; Aaron Hechmer; Lisa Simirenko; Soile V E Keränen; David W Knowles; Mark Stapleton; Peter Bickel; Mark D Biggin; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Versatile P[acman] BAC libraries for transgenesis studies in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Koen J T Venken; Joseph W Carlson; Karen L Schulze; Hongling Pan; Yuchun He; Rebecca Spokony; Kenneth H Wan; Maxim Koriabine; Pieter J de Jong; Kevin P White; Hugo J Bellen; Roger A Hoskins
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  15 in total

1.  Chromatin profiling of Drosophila CNS subpopulations identifies active transcriptional enhancers.

Authors:  Joseph C Pearson; Daniel J McKay; Jason D Lieb; Stephen T Crews
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Defining the Boundaries of Polycomb Domains in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sandip De; Natalie D Gehred; Miki Fujioka; Fountane W Chan; James B Jaynes; Judith A Kassis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Disparate expression specificities coded by a shared Hox-C enhancer.

Authors:  Steve W Miller; James W Posakony
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Zygotic pioneer factor activity of Odd-paired/Zic is necessary for late function of the Drosophila segmentation network.

Authors:  Isabella V Soluri; Lauren M Zumerling; Omar A Payan Parra; Eleanor G Clark; Shelby A Blythe
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Mimicry diversification in Papilio dardanus via a genomic inversion in the regulatory region of engrailed-invected.

Authors:  Martijn J T N Timmermans; Amrita Srivathsan; Steve Collins; Rudolf Meier; Alfried P Vogler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Transcriptional coupling of distant regulatory genes in living embryos.

Authors:  Michal Levo; João Raimundo; Xin Yang Bing; Zachary Sisco; Philippe J Batut; Sergey Ryabichko; Thomas Gregor; Michael S Levine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 69.504

7.  Co-option of an Ancestral Hox-Regulated Network Underlies a Recently Evolved Morphological Novelty.

Authors:  William J Glassford; Winslow C Johnson; Natalie R Dall; Sarah Jacquelyn Smith; Yang Liu; Werner Boll; Markus Noll; Mark Rebeiz
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 12.270

8.  Atrophin controls developmental signaling pathways via interactions with Trithorax-like.

Authors:  Kelvin Yeung; Ann Boija; Edvin Karlsson; Per-Henrik Holmqvist; Yonit Tsatskis; Ilaria Nisoli; Damian Yap; Alireza Lorzadeh; Michelle Moksa; Martin Hirst; Samuel Aparicio; Manolis Fanto; Per Stenberg; Mattias Mannervik; Helen McNeill
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Formation of a Polycomb-Domain in the Absence of Strong Polycomb Response Elements.

Authors:  Sandip De; Apratim Mitra; Yuzhong Cheng; Karl Pfeifer; Judith A Kassis
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Diverse Cis-Regulatory Mechanisms Contribute to Expression Evolution of Tandem Gene Duplicates.

Authors:  Luís Baudouin-Gonzalez; Marília A Santos; Camille Tempesta; Élio Sucena; Fernando Roch; Kohtaro Tanaka
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.