Literature DB >> 25170792

The role of dopamine in motor flexibility.

Sven Bestmann1, Diane Ruge, John Rothwell, Joseph M Galea.   

Abstract

Humans carry out many daily tasks in a seemingly automatic fashion. However, when unexpected changes in the environment occur, we have the capacity to inhibit prepotent behavior and replace it with an alternative one. Such behavioral flexibility is a hallmark of executive functions. The neurotransmitter dopamine is known to be crucial for fast, efficient, and accurate cognitive flexibility. Despite the perceived similarities between cognitive and motor flexibility, less is known regarding the role of dopamine within the motor domain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the role of dopamine in motor flexibility. In a double-blind, five-session, within-subject pharmacological experiment, human participants performed an RT task within a probabilistic context that was either predictable or unpredictable. The probabilistic nature of the predictable context resulted in prediction errors. This required participants to replace the prepotent or prepared action with an unprepared action (motor flexibility). The task was overlearned, and changes in context were explicitly instructed, thus controlling for contributions from other dopamine-related processes such as probabilistic or reversal learning and interactions with other types of uncertainty. We found that dopamine receptor blockade by high-dose haloperidol (D1/D2 dopamine receptors) impaired participants' ability to react to unexpected events occurring in a predictable context, which elicit large prediction errors and necessitate motor flexibility. This effect was not observed with selective D2 receptor blockade (sulpiride), with a general increase in tonic dopamine levels (levodopa), or during an unpredictable context, which evoked minimal prediction error. We propose that dopamine is vital in responding to low-level prediction errors about stimulus outcome that requires motor flexibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25170792     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Dopaminergic challenge dissociates learning from primary versus secondary sources of information.

Authors:  Alicia J Rybicki; Sophie L Sowden; Bianca Schuster; Jennifer L Cook
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Pharmacological Fingerprints of Contextual Uncertainty.

Authors:  Louise Marshall; Christoph Mathys; Diane Ruge; Archy O de Berker; Peter Dayan; Klaas E Stephan; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Effects of tolcapone and bromocriptine on cognitive stability and flexibility.

Authors:  Ian G M Cameron; Deanna L Wallace; Ahmad Al-Zughoul; Andrew S Kayser; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Pharmacological Dopamine Manipulation Does Not Alter Reward-Based Improvements in Memory Retention during a Visuomotor Adaptation Task.

Authors:  Graziella Quattrocchi; Jessica Monaco; Andy Ho; Friederike Irmen; Wolfgang Strube; Diane Ruge; Sven Bestmann; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-07-16

5.  Intact predictive motor sequence learning in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  A J Rybicki; J M Galea; B A Schuster; C Hiles; C Fabian; J L Cook
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Neural signals encoding shifts in beliefs.

Authors:  Philipp Schwartenbeck; Thomas H B FitzGerald; Ray Dolan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Enhanced transformation of incidentally learned knowledge into explicit memory by dopaminergic modulation.

Authors:  Mareike Clos; Tobias Sommer; Signe L Schneider; Michael Rose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Forget-me-some: General versus special purpose models in a hierarchical probabilistic task.

Authors:  Franziska Bröker; Louise Marshall; Sven Bestmann; Peter Dayan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.