Literature DB >> 25170791

Cognitive control predicts use of model-based reinforcement learning.

A Ross Otto1, Anya Skatova, Seth Madlon-Kay, Nathaniel D Daw.   

Abstract

Accounts of decision-making and its neural substrates have long posited the operation of separate, competing valuation systems in the control of choice behavior. Recent theoretical and experimental work suggest that this classic distinction between behaviorally and neurally dissociable systems for habitual and goal-directed (or more generally, automatic and controlled) choice may arise from two computational strategies for reinforcement learning (RL), called model-free and model-based RL, but the cognitive or computational processes by which one system may dominate over the other in the control of behavior is a matter of ongoing investigation. To elucidate this question, we leverage the theoretical framework of cognitive control, demonstrating that individual differences in utilization of goal-related contextual information--in the service of overcoming habitual, stimulus-driven responses--in established cognitive control paradigms predict model-based behavior in a separate, sequential choice task. The behavioral correspondence between cognitive control and model-based RL compellingly suggests that a common set of processes may underpin the two behaviors. In particular, computational mechanisms originally proposed to underlie controlled behavior may be applicable to understanding the interactions between model-based and model-free choice behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25170791      PMCID: PMC4387848          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  58 in total

1.  The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task.

Authors:  Tobias Egner; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation.

Authors:  Todd S Braver; Deanna M Barch
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Mark A McDaniel; Michael K Scullin; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity.

Authors:  B L Odlaug; S R Chamberlain; S W Kim; L R N Schreiber; J E Grant
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Cognitive control of drug craving inhibits brain reward regions in cocaine abusers.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Joanna S Fowler; Gene-Jack Wang; Frank Telang; Jean Logan; Millard Jayne; Yeming Ma; Kith Pradhan; Christopher Wong; James M Swanson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Of goals and habits: age-related and individual differences in goal-directed decision-making.

Authors:  Ben Eppinger; Maik Walter; Hauke R Heekeren; Shu-Chen Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Disruption of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex decreases model-based in favor of model-free control in humans.

Authors:  Peter Smittenaar; Thomas H B FitzGerald; Vincenzo Romei; Nicholas D Wright; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The mixed instrumental controller: using value of information to combine habitual choice and mental simulation.

Authors:  Giovanni Pezzulo; Francesco Rigoli; Fabian Chersi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-04

Review 10.  Goals and habits in the brain.

Authors:  Ray J Dolan; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  52 in total

1.  Explicit and implicit reinforcement learning across the psychosis spectrum.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Cameron S Carter; James M Gold; Sheri L Johnson; Ann M Kring; Angus W MacDonald; Diego A Pizzagalli; J Daniel Ragland; Steven M Silverstein; Milton E Strauss
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2017-04-13

2.  Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems.

Authors:  Danielle S Bassett; Muzhi Yang; Nicholas F Wymbs; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Coupled Decision Processes Update and Maintain Saccadic Priors in a Dynamic Environment.

Authors:  Timothy Doyeon Kim; Mohammad Kabir; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Adaptive integration of habits into depth-limited planning defines a habitual-goal-directed spectrum.

Authors:  Mehdi Keramati; Peter Smittenaar; Raymond J Dolan; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Habits without values.

Authors:  Kevin J Miller; Amitai Shenhav; Elliot A Ludvig
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Impaired Flexible Reward-Based Decision-Making in Binge Eating Disorder: Evidence from Computational Modeling and Functional Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Andrea M F Reiter; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Florian Schlagenhauf; Lorenz Deserno
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Rule abstraction, model-based choice, and cognitive reflection.

Authors:  Hilary J Don; Micah B Goldwater; A Ross Otto; Evan J Livesey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

8.  Classifying emotion regulation strategies.

Authors:  Candace M Raio; Elizabeth V Goldfarb; Karolina M Lempert; Peter Sokol-Hessner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Task-evoked pupillary responses track effort exertion: Evidence from task-switching.

Authors:  Kevin da Silva Castanheira; Sophia LoParco; A Ross Otto
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Immediate versus delayed control demands elicit distinct mechanisms for instantiating proactive control.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Janowich; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.