Literature DB >> 25170745

The length of a positive surgical margin is of prognostic significance in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Einar Servoll1, Ljiljana Vlatkovic, Thorstein Sæter, Jahn M Nesland, Ulrika Axcrona, Gudmund Waaler, Karol Axcrona.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish predictors of clinical failure in patients operated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinically localized prostate cancer (PC) by analyzing the pathological characteristics of positive surgical margins (PSM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The RP specimens of 303 consecutive patients operated with RP between 1985 and 2009 were reviewed. PSM were analyzed with regard to the PSM length, location and multifocality and the Gleason score (GS) at the PSM.
RESULTS: Of the 163 patients with PSM, 79 (48%) progressed to clinical failure compared to 30 (22%) in the negative-margin-status group. In univariate analysis, a GS at the PSM ≥4 + 3 = 7 (p = 0. 013) and a PSM length >3.0 mm (p < 0.005) were significantly associated with higher clinical failure rates compared to a GS at the PSM ≤3 + 4 = 7 and ≤3.0 mm in extent, respectively. A linear extent of the PSM ≤3.0 mm appeared to have the same clinical outcome as in the group with a negative margin status. In multivariate analysis, a PSM length >3.0 mm remained an independent predictor of clinical failure.
CONCLUSIONS: PSM length is an independent predictor of clinical failure following RP. 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25170745     DOI: 10.1159/000362342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in a Singapore cohort of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yadong Lu; Hong Hong Huang; Weber Kam On Lau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Intraoperative imaging in pathology-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Floris J Voskuil; Jasper Vonk; Bert van der Vegt; Schelto Kruijff; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Pieter J van der Zaag; Max J H Witjes; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 25.671

3.  Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases.

Authors:  Antonio B Porcaro; Alessandro Tafuri; Marco Sebben; Paolo Corsi; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Nelia Amigoni; Riccardo Rizzetto; Aliasger Shakir; Giovanni Cacciamani; Arianna Mariotto; Matteo Brunelli; Riccardo Bernasconi; Giovanni Novella; Vincenzo De Marco; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2019-05-30

4.  Impact of positive surgical margin on biochemical recurrence in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wonchul Lee; Bumjin Lim; Yoon Soo Kyung; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2021-03-09

5.  A Recursive Partitioning Analysis Demonstrating Risk Subsets for 8-Year Biochemical Relapse After Margin-Positive Radical Prostatectomy Without Adjuvant Hormone or Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Steven N Seyedin; John M Watkins; Zachary Mayo; Anthony N Snow; Michael Laszewski; J Kyle Russo; Sarah L Mott; Chad R Tracy; Mark C Smith; John M Buatti; Joseph M Caster
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-14

6.  Lack of an Association between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and PSA Failure of Prostate Cancer Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yoko Maeda; Takashi Kawahara; Mitsuyuki Koizumi; Hiroki Ito; Yohei Kumano; Mari Ohtaka; Takuya Kondo; Taku Mochizuki; Yusuke Hattori; Jun-Ichi Teranishi; Yasushi Yumura; Yasuhide Miyoshi; Masahiro Yao; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Hiroji Uemura
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.