Gwyn Jolley1, Toby Freeman1, Fran Baum1, Catherine Hurley1, Angela Lawless1, Michael Bentley1, Ronald Labonté2, David Sanders3. 1. Southgate Institute for Health, Society, and Equity, Faculty of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada. 3. School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Bellville 7535, South Africa.
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED: This paper examines recent Australian health reform policies and considers how the primary health care (PHC) workforce experiences subsequent change and perceives its impact on health promotion practice. METHODS: Health policy documents were analysed to determine their intended impact on health promotion. Interviews were conducted with 39 respondents from four State-funded PHC services to gain their perceptions of the impact of policy change on health promotion. RESULTS: There have been a plethora of policy and strategy documents over the last decade relevant to PHC, and these suggest an intention to strengthen health promotion. However, respondents report that changes to the role and focus of PHC services have led to fewer opportunities for health promotion. Services are struggling to engage in health promotion activity, while funding and policy directions are prioritised to targeted, individual behaviour change. CONCLUSION: The experience of PHC workforce respondents in South Australia suggests that, despite policy intentions, health promotion practice is much reduced. Our research suggests that rigorous evaluation of health sector reforms should be undertaken to assess both intended and unintended outcomes in terms of service quality and delivery. SO WHAT? Health promoters are experiencing a contradictory policy and practice environment, and this research should assist health promoters in advocating for more government accountability in the implementation of policies in order to advance comprehensive PHC.
ISSUE ADDRESSED: This paper examines recent Australian health reform policies and considers how the primary health care (PHC) workforce experiences subsequent change and perceives its impact on health promotion practice. METHODS: Health policy documents were analysed to determine their intended impact on health promotion. Interviews were conducted with 39 respondents from four State-funded PHC services to gain their perceptions of the impact of policy change on health promotion. RESULTS: There have been a plethora of policy and strategy documents over the last decade relevant to PHC, and these suggest an intention to strengthen health promotion. However, respondents report that changes to the role and focus of PHC services have led to fewer opportunities for health promotion. Services are struggling to engage in health promotion activity, while funding and policy directions are prioritised to targeted, individual behaviour change. CONCLUSION: The experience of PHC workforce respondents in South Australia suggests that, despite policy intentions, health promotion practice is much reduced. Our research suggests that rigorous evaluation of health sector reforms should be undertaken to assess both intended and unintended outcomes in terms of service quality and delivery. SO WHAT? Health promoters are experiencing a contradictory policy and practice environment, and this research should assist health promoters in advocating for more government accountability in the implementation of policies in order to advance comprehensive PHC.
Authors: Toby Freeman; Fran Baum; Angela Lawless; Ronald Labonté; David Sanders; John Boffa; Tahnia Edwards; Sara Javanparast Journal: Health Hum Rights Date: 2016-12
Authors: Sara Javanparast; Toby Freeman; Fran Baum; Ronald Labonté; Anna Ziersch; Tamara Mackean; Richard Reed; David Sanders Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.295