Literature DB >> 25169788

Prosthesis infection: diagnosis after total joint arthroplasty with three-phase bone scintigraphy.

Zhengxiao Ouyang1, Haowei Li, Xuqiang Liu, Zanjing Zhai, Xianan Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the diagnostic validity of Three-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in cases of suspected infected total joint arthroplasty.
METHODS: We performed a systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and OVID databases to conduct pertinent data published between January 1990 and December 2013. Meta-analysis was used to pool sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), and post-test probability. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed, and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: Twenty articles including a total of 704 patients were considered for analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for using TPBS to detect PJI was 0.83 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.90] and 0.73 (95 % CI 0.65-0.80), respectively. The AUC, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.85 (95 % CI 0.81-0.87), 3.1 (95 % CI 2.4-4.1), 0.23 (95 % CI 0.14-0.38), and 14 (95 % CI 7-26), respectively. Low clinical scenario-negative post-test probabilities were 7 %, and high clinical scenario-positive post-test probabilities were 90 %. Subgroup analyses indicated that the sensitivity and specificity of TPBS for detecting infected arthroplasty of the hip (0.81 and 0.78, respectively) were significantly higher than those of the knee (0.75 and 0.55, respectively; p < 0.05). There was no significant evidence of publication bias (p = 0.34).
CONCLUSIONS: TPBS has reasonable diagnostic value for detecting PJI and could be performed as a screening test or part of preoperative tests and analysed in conjunction with other findings at the time of suspected PJI, especially in those infections affecting the hip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25169788     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-014-0899-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  13 in total

1.  EKA survey: diagnosis of prosthetic knee joint infection.

Authors:  Sufian S Ahmad; Roland Becker; Antonia F Chen; Sandro Kohl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Systematics of glenohumoral and acromioclavicular arthritis].

Authors:  A Seifarth; F Roemer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Bone scan usefulness in patients with painful hip or knee prosthesis: 10 situations that can cause pain, other than loosening and infection.

Authors:  Sofia Vaz; Teresa C Ferreira; Lucília Salgado; Frédéric Paycha
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-11-30

Review 4.  Diagnosis of peripheral bone and prosthetic joint infections: overview on the consensus documents by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement).

Authors:  Luca Maria Sconfienza; Alberto Signore; Victor Cassar-Pullicino; Maria Adriana Cataldo; Olivier Gheysens; Olivier Borens; Andrej Trampuz; Klaus Wörtler; Nicola Petrosillo; Heinz Winkler; Filip M H M Vanhoenacker; Paul C Jutte; Andor W J M Glaudemans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The Temporal Impact of Prosthesis Implantation and Semi-Quantitative Criteria on the Diagnostic Efficacy of Triple-Phase Bone Scanning for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Feiyang Zhang; Chentian Shen; Jinlong Yu; Xiaohua Chen; Qiaojie Wang; Zhenkui Sun; Hao Shen
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  Prosthetic joint infections: diagnosis, management, and complications of the two-stage replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jack Porrino; Annie Wang; Austin Moats; Hyojeong Mulcahy; Kimia Kani
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Accuracy of diagnostic tests for prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sufian S Ahmad; Ahmed Shaker; Mo Saffarini; Antonia F Chen; Michael T Hirschmann; Sandro Kohl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Serum and Synovial Fluid Interleukin-6 for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Kai Xie; Kerong Dai; Xinhua Qu; Mengning Yan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  What is the Accuracy of Nuclear Imaging in the Assessment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steven J Verberne; Remko J A Sonnega; Olivier P P Temmerman; Pieter G Raijmakers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Use of Common Inflammatory Markers in the Long-Term Screening of Total Hip Arthroprosthesis Infections: Our Experience.

Authors:  Gabriele Falzarano; Antonio Piscopo; Predrag Grubor; Giuseppe Rollo; Antonio Medici; Valerio Pipola; Michele Bisaccia; Auro Caraffa; Elizabeth Mary Barron; Francesco Nobile; Raffaele Cioffi; Luigi Meccariello
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2017-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.