Literature DB >> 25169258

Towards the development of a bioengineered uterus: comparison of different protocols for rat uterus decellularization.

M Hellström1, R R El-Akouri2, C Sihlbom3, B M Olsson3, J Lengqvist3, H Bäckdahl4, B R Johansson5, M Olausson6, S Sumitran-Holgersson6, M Brännström2.   

Abstract

Uterus transplantation (UTx) may be the only possible curative treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility, which affects 1 in every 500 females of fertile age. We recently presented the 6-month results from the first clinical UTx trial, describing nine live-donor procedures. This routine involves complicated surgery and requires potentially harmful immune suppression to prevent rejection. However, tissue engineering applications using biomaterials and stem cells may replace the need for a live donor, and could prevent the required immunosuppressive treatment. To investigate the basic aspects of this, we developed a novel whole-uterus scaffold design for uterus tissue engineering experiments in the rat. Decellularization was achieved by perfusion of detergents and ionic solutions. The remaining matrix and its biochemical and mechanical properties were quantitatively compared from using three different protocols. The constructs were further compared with native uterus tissue composition. Perfusion with Triton X-100/dimethyl sulfoxide/H2O led to a compact, weaker scaffold that showed evidence of a compromised matrix organization. Sodium deoxycholate/dH2O perfusion gave rise to a porous scaffold that structurally and mechanically resembled native uterus better. An innovative combination of two proteomic analyses revealed higher fibronectin and versican content in these porous scaffolds, which may explain the improved scaffold organization. Together with other important protocol-dependent differences, our results can contribute to the development of improved decellularization protocols for assorted organs. Furthermore, our study shows the first available data on decellularized whole uterus, and creates new opportunities for numerous in vitro and in vivo whole-uterus tissue engineering applications.
Copyright © 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECM (extracellular matrix); Infertility; Scaffold; Tissue engineering; Transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25169258     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  27 in total

Review 1.  Uterus transplantation: From animal models through the first heart beating pregnancy to the first human live birth.

Authors:  Omer Ozkan; Nasuh Utku Dogan; Ozlenen Ozkan; Inanc Mendilcioglu; Selen Dogan; Batu Aydinuraz; Mehmet Simsek
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-07

2.  Development of a novel human recellularized endometrium that responds to a 28-day hormone treatment.

Authors:  Susan A Olalekan; Joanna E Burdette; Spiro Getsios; Teresa K Woodruff; J Julie Kim
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Human Testis Extracellular Matrix Enhances Human Spermatogonial Stem Cell Survival In Vitro.

Authors:  Mark H Murdock; Sherin David; Ilea T Swinehart; Janet E Reing; Kien Tran; Kathrin Gassei; Kyle E Orwig; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Development of an efficient perfusion-based protocol for whole-organ decellularization of the ovine uterus as a human-sized model and in vivo application of the bioscaffolds.

Authors:  Seyedeh Sima Daryabari; Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Kiarad Fendereski; Fariba Ghorbani; Mehrshad Dehnavi; Minoo Rostami; Bahram Azizi Garajegayeh; Seyed Mohammad Tavangar
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  What will the future hold for artificial organs in the service of assisted reproduction: prospects and considerations.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Petroula Tsioulou; Anna Rapani; Polina Giannelou; Nikolaos Kiriakopoulos; Agni Pantou; Nikolaos Vlahos; George Anifandis; Stamatis Bolaris; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Controlling stem cell behavior with decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  Gillie Agmon; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 11.354

Review 7.  Regenerative Medicine Approaches in Bioengineering Female Reproductive Tissues.

Authors:  Sivanandane Sittadjody; Tracy Criswell; John D Jackson; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.060

8.  The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges.

Authors:  Seppe Segers
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 9.  Bioengineering of the Uterus.

Authors:  Yushi Yoshimasa; Tetsuo Maruyama
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 10.  Recent Advancements in Engineered Biomaterials for the Regeneration of Female Reproductive Organs.

Authors:  Yoon Young Kim; Hoon Kim; Sung Woo Kim; Seung-Yup Ku
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.