Literature DB >> 25169173

Sex-specific mortality risk by QRS morphology and duration in patients receiving CRT: results from the NCDR.

Robbert Zusterzeel1, Jeptha P Curtis2, Daniel A Caños1, William E Sanders1, Kimberly A Selzman1, Ileana L Piña1, Erica S Spatz2, Haikun Bao2, Angelo Ponirakis3, Paul D Varosy4, Frederick A Masoudi5, David G Strauss6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have suggested that women have better outcomes than men after cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare mortality after CRT-D implantation by sex, QRS morphology, and duration.
METHODS: Survival curves and covariate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were used to assess mortality by sex in 31,892 CRT-D patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) registry between 2006 and 2009, with up to 5 years' follow-up (median 2.9 years, interquartile range: 2.0 to 3.9 years). Patients were grouped by QRS morphology and 10-ms increments in QRS duration.
RESULTS: Among patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), women had a 21% lower mortality risk than men (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.84; p < 0.001); however, there was no sex difference in non-LBBB (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.06; p = 0.37). Longer QRS duration was associated with better survival in both sexes with LBBB, but not in patients without LBBB. Compared with women with LBBB and QRS of 120 to 129 ms, women with LBBB and QRS of 140 to 149 ms had a 27% lower mortality (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.88; p = 0.001); this difference was 18% in men (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.93; p = 0.003). Mortality in LBBB and QRS of 150 ms or longer compared with those with LBBB and QRS of 120 to 129 ms was similar between sexes (HR: 0.61 to 0.68; p < 0.001 for women and HR: 0.58 to 0.66; p < 0.001 for men). Sex interactions within 10-ms groups were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with LBBB who received CRT-D, mortality is lower in women than men. Additionally, longer QRS duration in LBBB is associated with better survival in both sexes. In contrast, there is no sex difference in patients without LBBB, regardless of QRS duration. Further studies should include a non-CRT comparator group to confirm these findings.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  QRS duration; QRS morphology; cardiac resynchronization therapy; men; women

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25169173     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  24 in total

Review 1.  Roles and indications for use of implantable defibrillator and resynchronization therapy in the prevention of sudden cardiac death in heart failure.

Authors:  Yitschak Biton; Jayson R Baman; Bronislava Polonsky
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Predictors of long-term mortality with cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Yitschak Biton; Jason Costa; Wojciech Zareba; Jayson R Baman; Ilan Goldenberg; Scott McNitt; Scott D Solomon; Bronislava Polonsky; Valentina Kutyifa
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  ICD and CRT use in ischemic heart disease in women.

Authors:  Nishaki Kiran Mehta; William T Abraham; Melanie Maytin
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Machine Learning Algorithm Predicts Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Outcomes: Lessons From the COMPANION Trial.

Authors:  Matthew M Kalscheur; Ryan T Kipp; Matthew C Tattersall; Chaoqun Mei; Kevin A Buhr; David L DeMets; Michael E Field; Lee L Eckhardt; C David Page
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-01

5.  Precision Medicine for Cardiac Resynchronization: Predicting Quality of Life Benefits for Individual Patients-An Analysis From 5 Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Michael E Nassif; Yuanyuan Tang; John G Cleland; William T Abraham; Cecilia Linde; Michael R Gold; James B Young; J Claude Daubert; Lou Sherfesee; Dan Schaber; Anthony S L Tang; Philip G Jones; Suzanne V Arnold; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 6.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Miriam Shanks; Victoria Delgado; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 7.  Prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator in heart failure: the growing evidence for all or Primum non nocere for some?

Authors:  Khang-Li Looi; Nigel Lever; Anthony Tang; Sharad Agarwal
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 8.  Toward Sex-Specific Guidelines for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?

Authors:  Robbert Zusterzeel; Kimberly A Selzman; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; Daniel A Caños; Kevin Vernooy; Frits W Prinzen; Anton P M Gorgels; David G Strauss
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Long-term outcome with cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure patients with left bundle branch block from US and Europe MADIT-CRT.

Authors:  Yitschak Biton; Valentina Kutyifa; Wojciech Zareba; Helmut U Klein; Scott D Solomon; Scott McNitt; Bronislava Polonsky; Arthur J Moss; Ilan Goldenberg
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 10.  Sex differences in heart failure.

Authors:  Evann Eisenberg; Katherine E Di Palo; Ileana L Piña
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.