| Literature DB >> 25168872 |
Paolo T Pianosi1, Adele H Goodloe2, David Soma3, Ken O Parker4, Chad K Brands5, Philip R Fischer3.
Abstract
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is characterized by chronic fatigue and dizziness and affected individuals by definition have orthostatic intolerance and tachycardia. There is considerable overlap of symptoms in patients with POTS and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), prompting speculation that POTS is akin to a deconditioned state. We previously showed that adolescents with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) have excessive heart rate (HR) during, and slower HR recovery after, exercise - hallmarks of deconditioning. We also noted exaggerated cardiac output during exercise which led us to hypothesize that tachycardia could be a manifestation of a high output state rather than a consequence of deconditioning. We audited records of adolescents presenting with long-standing history of any mix of fatigue, dizziness, nausea, who underwent both head-up tilt table test and maximal exercise testing with measurement of cardiac output at rest plus 2-3 levels of exercise, and determined the cardiac output () versus oxygen uptake () relationship. Subjects with chronic fatigue were diagnosed with POTS if their HR rose ≥40 beat·min(-1) with head-up tilt. Among 107 POTS patients the distribution of slopes for the , relationship was skewed toward higher slopes but showed two peaks with a split at ~7.0 L·min(-1) per L·min(-1), designated as normal (5.08 ± 1.17, N = 66) and hyperkinetic (8.99 ± 1.31, N = 41) subgroups. In contrast, cardiac output rose appropriately with in 141 patients with chronic fatigue but without POTS, exhibiting a normal distribution and an average slope of 6.10 ± 2.09 L·min(-1) per L·min(-1). Mean arterial blood pressure and pulse pressure from rest to exercise rose similarly in both groups. We conclude that 40% of POTS adolescents demonstrate a hyperkinetic circulation during exercise. We attribute this to failure of normal regional vasoconstriction during exercise, such that patients must increase flow through an inappropriately vasodilated systemic circulation to maintain perfusion pressure.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac output; exercise; hyperkinetic circulation; orthostatic intolerance; sympathetic nervous system
Year: 2014 PMID: 25168872 PMCID: PMC4246579 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1.Flow diagram showing triage of patients with POTS, chronic fatigue, and exclusions.
Selected anthropometric, and resting circulatory data, split according to diagnosis, sex, and slope of the cardiac output – oxygen uptake relationship during exercise (POTS only)
| POTS | Chronic fatigue | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal flow | Hyperkinetic | |||||
| M | F | M | F | M | F | |
|
| 16 | 50 | 7 | 34 | 38 | 103 |
| Age (years) | 15 ± 3 | 16 ± 2 | 16 ± 1 | 15 ± 2 | 14.5 ± 1.7 | 15.8 ± 1.5 |
| Height (cm) | 174 ± 14 | 167 ± 8 | 183 ± 12 | 165 ± 7 | 171 ± 11 | 163 ± 7 |
| Weight (kg) | 63.2 ± 13.5 | 60.1 ± 12.5 | 76.5 ± 16.8 | 58.4 ± 11.0 | 70.2 ± 18.7 | 61.3 ± 13.0 |
| BSA (m2) | 1.76 ± 0.25 | 1.67 ± 0.18 | 1.98 ± 0.25 | 1.64 ± 0.17 | 23.7 ± 4.7 | 1.65 ± 0.17 |
| BMI (kg·m−2) | 20.7 ± 2.7 | 21.5 ± 3.7 | 22.8 ± 4.3 | 21.2 ± 3.4 | 1.81 ± 0.27 | 23.1 ± 4.1 |
| HR (beat·min−1) | 96 ± 17 | 90 ± 17 | 91 ± 11 | 99 ± 18 | 90 ± 14 | 94 ± 18 |
| CI (L·min−1·m−2) | 3.75 ± 0.89 | 3.65 ± 1.15 | 3.93 ± 0.85 | 3.34 ± 0.84 | 3.67 ± 0.76 | 3.77 ± 1.14 |
| Stroke volume index (mL·m−2) | 41 ± 12 | 37 ± 11 | 41 ± 9 | 36 ± 10 | 40 ± 11 | 39 ± 11 |
| Hgb (g·dL−1) | 14.6 ± 1.1 | 13.2 ± 0.6 | 14.9 ± 0.8 | 13.0 ± 0.7 | 14.5 ± 1.1 | 13.0 ± 0.9 |
Selected peak exercise data in patients, split according to diagnosis, sex, and slope of the cardiac output–oxygen uptake relationship during exercise (in POTS patients only)
| POTS | Chronic fatigue | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Hyperkinetic | |||||
| M | F | M | F | M | F | |
|
| ||||||
| mL·kg−1·min−1 | 33.8 ± 8.2 | 31.3 ± 6.2 | 34.0 ± 7.6 | 27.9 ± 6.5 | 36.1 ± 8.2 | 27.4 ± 6.0 |
| L·min−1 | 2.11 ± 0.60 | 1.86 ± 0.44 | 2.51 ± 0.38 | 1.63 ± 0.41 | 2.46 ± 0.57 | 1.64 ± 0.32 |
| Work | ||||||
| Watts | 150 ± 50 | 138 ± 30 | 184 ± 315 | 125 ± 31 | 170 ± 46 | 127 ± 26 |
| % predicted | 60 ± 23 | 77 ± 17 | 59 ± 14 | 73 ± 23 | 71 ± 19% | 76 ± 25% |
| HR | ||||||
| Beats·min−1 | 186 ± 17 | 187 ± 11 | 190 ± 11 | 189 ± 8 | 189 ± 10 | 187 ± 13 |
| O2 pulse | ||||||
| mL·beat−1 | 11.3 ± 3.0 | 9.3 ± 2.3 | 11.7 ± 3.8 | 8.7 ± 2.2 | 13.1 ± 3.2 | 8.8 ± 1.6 |
| VAT | ||||||
| % peak | 58 ± 9 | 58 ± 8 | 53 ± 6 | 58 ± 7 | 55 ± 12% | 61 ± 8% |
P < 0.02 girls with hyperkinetic circulation versus normal cardiac output.
Figure 2.Frequency distribution of slopes of cardiac output versus oxygen uptake from rest to exercise in patients with POTS (lower panel) or chronic fatigue (upper panel).
Figure 3.Box and whisker plots of HR (above) and stroke volume index (below) at rest, and during progressive exercise shown separately for normal and hyperkinetic cardiac output groups of POTS patients; and for patients with chronic fatigue.
Figure 4.Box and whisker plots of mean arterial blood pressure at rest and during progressive exercise (abscissa is percent maximum work capacity) shown separately for normal cardiac output and hyperkinetic groups of POTS patients.