Adel Kurkar1, Ahmad A Elderwy2, Sara M Awad3, Sherief Abulsorour1, Hassan A Aboul-Ella1, Ahmed Altaher1. 1. Department of Urology, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt. 2. Department of Urology, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt. Electronic address: ahmad.elderwy@gmail.com. 3. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with hemospermia and its relation to hyperuricemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2005 and July 2012, 143 patients with hemospermia presented to the outpatient clinic in our hospital. History, examination, workup, treatment outcomes, and long-term follow-up were reported in a prospective database. Patients were followed up monthly by semen examination till disappearance of hemospermia, then every 3 months for 1 year. We identified 43 patients, who had 4-12 hemospermia attacks for 2-10 months before presentation with no identifiable cause for hemospermia. Of them, 22 had hyperuricemia. The association between hemospermia and hyperuricemia was examined by comparing such 22 hyperuricemic hemospermic patients with the other 21 idiopathic hemospermic patients. RESULTS: The commonest 5 findings identified as possible causes of hemospermia were bilharziasis (21.6%), hyperuricemia (15.4%), idiopathic (14.7%), tuberculosis (8.4%), and chronic prostatitis (8.4%). Hyperuricemic hemospermic patients were significantly of younger age (median of 31.5 vs 45 years), complaining of more painful ejaculation (68.2% vs 9.5%), and had higher serum uric acid (median, 9.3 vs 4.5 mg/dL) compared with those of idiopathic hemospermia. Hemospermia disappeared completely in all patients of the hyperuricemia group vs only 25% of the idiopathic group (P <.001) within a mean of 2 months (range, 1-4 months). CONCLUSION: Hyperuricemia is a new probable cause of hemospermia. Further randomized studies are mandatory for establishment of our postulation.
OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with hemospermia and its relation to hyperuricemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2005 and July 2012, 143 patients with hemospermia presented to the outpatient clinic in our hospital. History, examination, workup, treatment outcomes, and long-term follow-up were reported in a prospective database. Patients were followed up monthly by semen examination till disappearance of hemospermia, then every 3 months for 1 year. We identified 43 patients, who had 4-12 hemospermia attacks for 2-10 months before presentation with no identifiable cause for hemospermia. Of them, 22 had hyperuricemia. The association between hemospermia and hyperuricemia was examined by comparing such 22 hyperuricemic hemospermicpatients with the other 21 idiopathic hemospermic patients. RESULTS: The commonest 5 findings identified as possible causes of hemospermia were bilharziasis (21.6%), hyperuricemia (15.4%), idiopathic (14.7%), tuberculosis (8.4%), and chronic prostatitis (8.4%). Hyperuricemic hemospermicpatients were significantly of younger age (median of 31.5 vs 45 years), complaining of more painful ejaculation (68.2% vs 9.5%), and had higher serum uric acid (median, 9.3 vs 4.5 mg/dL) compared with those of idiopathic hemospermia. Hemospermia disappeared completely in all patients of the hyperuricemia group vs only 25% of the idiopathic group (P <.001) within a mean of 2 months (range, 1-4 months). CONCLUSION:Hyperuricemia is a new probable cause of hemospermia. Further randomized studies are mandatory for establishment of our postulation.