OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of ultrasonography (US) for the detection of ureteral stone using non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) as a standard reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to September 2011, 428 patients underwent both NCCT and US on the same day. The sensitivity and specificity of US to detect ureteral stone was evaluated. The detection rates using US imaging were examined according to location and stone size. The sizes of stones determined in the longest axis of NCCT and US were compared. We also performed group classification based on size to examine whether stone sizes measured by NCCT and US were similar. Moreover, the factors that may affect the detection of ureteral stone by US were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 856 ureters, NCCT could detect 171 stones in 169 patients, whereas US could detect 98 stones, yielding a sensitivity of 57.3% and a specificity of 97.5%. Expectedly, detection rate of US increased with stone size but was lower for distal ureter. With hydronephrosis, the sensitivity of US improved from 57.3% to 81.3%. Stone sizes measured by US correlated positively with those by computed tomography, and were concordant with those of NCCT in 68 of 98 patients (69.4%). Interestingly, stone size and the presence of hydronephrosis were factors that independently affected ureteral stone detection by US. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that US may be useful as an initial imaging modality for detecting ureteral stone.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of ultrasonography (US) for the detection of ureteral stone using non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) as a standard reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to September 2011, 428 patients underwent both NCCT and US on the same day. The sensitivity and specificity of US to detect ureteral stone was evaluated. The detection rates using US imaging were examined according to location and stone size. The sizes of stones determined in the longest axis of NCCT and US were compared. We also performed group classification based on size to examine whether stone sizes measured by NCCT and US were similar. Moreover, the factors that may affect the detection of ureteral stone by US were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 856 ureters, NCCT could detect 171 stones in 169 patients, whereas US could detect 98 stones, yielding a sensitivity of 57.3% and a specificity of 97.5%. Expectedly, detection rate of US increased with stone size but was lower for distal ureter. With hydronephrosis, the sensitivity of US improved from 57.3% to 81.3%. Stone sizes measured by US correlated positively with those by computed tomography, and were concordant with those of NCCT in 68 of 98 patients (69.4%). Interestingly, stone size and the presence of hydronephrosis were factors that independently affected ureteral stone detection by US. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that US may be useful as an initial imaging modality for detecting ureteral stone.
Authors: Saeed R Khan; Margaret S Pearle; William G Robertson; Giovanni Gambaro; Benjamin K Canales; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer; Hans-Göran Tiselius Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Megan M Leo; Breanne K Langlois; Joseph R Pare; Patricia Mitchell; Judith Linden; Kerrie P Nelson; Cristopher Amanti; Kristin A Carmody Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2017-05-15