| Literature DB >> 25168356 |
Yun Bai, Zhuangzhi Zhang, Lei Jin, Hui Kang, Yongqiang Zhu, Lu Zhang, Xia Li, Fengshou Ma, Li Zhao, Baoxin Shi, Jun Li, Donald P McManus, Wenbao Zhang1, Shengyue Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important post-transcriptional regulators which control growth and development in eukaryotes. The cestode Echinococcus granulosus has a complex life-cycle involving different development stages but the mechanisms underpinning this development, including the involvement of miRNAs, remain unknown.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25168356 PMCID: PMC4156656 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Size distribution and classification of the small RNAs in the different libraries. (a) Length distribution of the sequencing reads in the three libraries. The length percentages were calculated by dividing the counts of 18–30 nts reads in each library. The lengths of the small RNA reads are mainly distributed from 20 to 24 nts. (b) Classification of the sequenced small RNAs from adults, cyst and protoscoleces (PSC), respectively. The percentages were calculated by dividing the counts of reads matched to the genome.
Figure 2Novel miRNAs and clusters detected in (a) The location of miRNA gene clusters in E. granulosus scaffolds. The rightward arrow indicates the location of the miRNA gene at the positive strand, while the leftward arrow indicates the miRNAs at the minus strand. The secondary structures of Echinococcus cluster containing new-17, new-24, new-61 and new-7 (b) and the cluster containing new-12 and new-22 (c) were predicted by mfold. The sequence of the mature miRNAs is shaded in grep. Limited by the size of the miRNA cluster, we used “N” instead of 5464 nt RNA sequences at the location between new-61 and new-7.
Figure 3Loss and gain of miRNA families in and other flatworms (a) The table for conserved miRNAs found in E. granulosus and inferred loss/gain number of conserved miRNA families. (b) The acquisition (red) and loss (blue) of miRNA families for 4 flatworms. Numbers in white squares show evolutionary acquisition and loss of miRNA families in each flatworms; Numbers in black squares show acquisition and loss of miRNA families in flatworms, Neodermataand Trematoda + Cestoda. (c) The distribution of the conserved eumetazoan (blue), bilaterian (orange), protostomian (green), lophotrochozoan (purple), and Platyhelminthes (yellow) miRNA families in flatworms.
The relative abundance of the top ten mature miRNAs in three life-stages of
| Name | Adult* | Cyst* | PSC* | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 325369.55 | 546105.37 | 302855.40 | 1174330.33 |
|
| 279745.11 | 71718.95 | 142856.71 | 494320.77 |
|
| 16646.88 | 215441.80 | 10754.68 | 242843.36 |
|
| 13664.44 | 31789.98 | 95330.97 | 140785.39 |
|
| 77170.13 | 18409.03 | 30980.17 | 126559.32 |
|
| 10474.34 | 12561.26 | 95883.37 | 118918.97 |
|
| 31467.55 | 23201.17 | 47866.69 | 102535.41 |
|
| 8397.63 | 9500.11 | 78860.01 | 96757.75 |
|
| 25468.42 | 10554.49 | 39333.51 | 75356.42 |
|
| 17502.57 | 19390.63 | 34640.86 | 71534.06 |
*The relative expression levels of each miRNA were calculated by counting the numbers of respective miRNA reads normalized to the total number of reads of annotated miRNAs from each library.
Figure 4Different expression profiles of miRNAs in . (a) Heat maps of sequencing data from 65 differentially expressed miRNAs in the three libraries. The correct P-value < 0.001 and fold-change > 2.0 were used as the threshold criteria to define significant differences in miRNA expression. MiRNA expression is displayed using a color key where green corresponds to low and red to high numbers of miRNA normalized reads. (b) Differentially expressed miRNAs through comparing the adult or cyst with the PSC. Red arrow indicates the up-regulated miRNAs, and blue arrow represents the down-regulated miRNAs. (c) The different expression patterns of miRNAs through comparing the adult or cyst with the PSC. The comparison between the adult and cyst was made and removed similar trends of miRNAs compared to the PSC.
Figure 5Comparison of mRNA expression levels of predicted miRNA targets in different stages of . (a) miR-31 vs ATP2B3, (b) miR-7 vs LCFACS showed nagetive correlation between expression of miRNA and their putative target genes, (c) let-7 vs VDR showed an positive correlation. The left and right Y-axes indicate the expression levels of the miRNAs and their targets, respectively. Blue bars show the expression levels of the miRNAs (log2 scale) in adult worms (Adult), protoscoleces (PSC) and cyst germinal membranes (Cyst) of E. granulosus. Red dots lines represent the expression levels of related target genes.