Literature DB >> 25168076

A qualitative study exploring use of the surprise question in the care of older people: perceptions of general practitioners and challenges for practice.

Margaret Elliott1, Caroline Nicholson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The question "Would you be surprised if this patient were to die in the next 6-12 months?" has been included in UK palliative care guidance with the aim of supporting the identification and care planning of those nearing the end of life. Little is known about how the surprise question is utilised in the care of older people within primary care. This study sought to explore the perceptions and experiences of general practitioners (GPs).
METHOD: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 GPs. Each interview reflected on the care of two people, aged 80 years or older, selected by the GP as possibly being in the last year of life. Analysis followed a grounded theory approach within a framework of interpretive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Data discussing 22 clinical cases revealed the difficulties experienced by GPs when assessing prognosis for older people with non-malignant conditions, despite their recognition of multiple mortality risk factors and high symptom burden. GPs did not appear to include the surprise question within their usual practice and expressed concerns regarding its use to facilitate discussion of advance care plans. These concerns highlighted the subjective nature of the surprise question and potential barriers to conducting discussions of preferences for future care.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater understanding is needed as to the difficulties experienced by GPs when assessing prognosis in older people. We propose a thematic model which could support GPs by focusing assessment on the supportive and palliative care needs of older people nearing the end of life. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advance care plan; end of life; older people; primary care; surprise question

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25168076     DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 2045-435X            Impact factor:   3.568


  13 in total

1.  Reliability and Utility of the Surprise Question in CKD Stages 4 to 5.

Authors:  Andrei D Javier; Rocio Figueroa; Edward D Siew; Huzaifah Salat; Jennifer Morse; Thomas G Stewart; Rakesh Malhotra; Manisha Jhamb; Jane O Schell; Cesar Y Cardona; Cathy A Maxwell; T Alp Ikizler; Khaled Abdel-Kader
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  The authors respond to "The utility and value of the 'surprise question' for patients with serious illness".

Authors:  James Downar; Russell Goldman; Ruxandra Pinto; Marina Englesakis; Neill Adhikari
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Yonder: Welfare advice, pelvic floor training, telephone consultations, and the surprise question.

Authors:  Ahmed Rashid
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Timing of GP end-of-life recognition in people aged ≥75 years: retrospective cohort study using data from primary healthcare records in England.

Authors:  Daniel Stow; Fiona E Matthews; Barbara Hanratty
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  The "surprise question" for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James Downar; Russell Goldman; Ruxandra Pinto; Marina Englesakis; Neill K J Adhikari
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Using Implementation Science to Further the Adoption and Implementation of Advance Care Planning in Rural Primary Care.

Authors:  Heather Nelson-Brantley; Carol Buller; Christie Befort; Edward Ellerbeck; Ariel Shifter; Shellie Ellis
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.176

Review 7.  Prognostication of Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Predicting the Unpredictable?

Authors:  David Hui
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  Providing end-of-life care in general practice: findings of a national GP questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Sarah Mitchell; Joelle Loew; Catherine Millington-Sanders; Jeremy Dale
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Early Identification of Patients in Need of Palliative Care in Slovenian General Practice.

Authors:  Lisette Klok; Yvonne Engels; Carel Veldhoven; Danica Rotar Pavlič
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2018-04-06

10.  An online international comparison of thresholds for triggering a negative response to the "Surprise Question": a study protocol.

Authors:  Nicola White; Linda Oostendorp; Victoria Vickerstaff; Christina Gerlach; Yvonne Engels; Maud Maessen; Christopher Tomlinson; Johan Wens; Bert Leysen; Guido Biasco; Sofia Zambrano; Steffen Eychmüller; Christina Avgerinou; Rabih Chattat; Giovanni Ottoboni; Carel Veldhoven; Patrick Stone
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.