Literature DB >> 25167974

Use of ischemic ECG patterns for risk stratification in intermediate-risk patients with acute PE.

Piotr Kukla1, William F McIntyre2, Kamil Fijorek3, Ewa Krupa4, Ewa Mirek-Bryniarska5, Marek Jastrzębski6, Krzysztof L Bryniarski7, Wiktor Zajchowski8, Leszek Bryniarski6, Adrian Baranchuk9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: European recommendations on the management of acute pulmonary embolism (APE) divide patients into 3 risk categories: high, intermediate, and low. Mortality has previously been estimated at 3% to 15% in the intermediate group. The aim of this study was to use a new metric "ischemic electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns" to more precisely estimate the risk (complications or death) of APE patients identified as "intermediate risk" by current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria.
METHODS: The study group consisted of 500 consecutive patients (290 females), with a mean age 66.3 ± 15.2 years, and 245 (72.8%) patients were initially classified as intermediate risk. Four ischemic ECG patterns were studied: (i) ST-segment ischemic pattern (STIP), (ii) global ischemic pattern (GIP), (iii) negative T wave pattern, and (iv) control group consisting of patients with no ischemic changes.
RESULTS: Predictors of death in univariate analysis included elevated troponin concentration (odds ratio [OR], 6.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-169; P = 0.02]) and ischemic ECG patterns: STIP (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.6-46.0; P = 0.007). Patients with right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) who were STIP (+) experienced significantly higher mortality rate compared to RVD patients who were STIP(-) (11.4% vs 1.6%; OR, 7.26; 95% CI, 1.82-52.8; P = 0.004). In patients with STIP (+) as compared to STIP (-), rate of death (OR, 6.35; P = 0.007) and rate of complications (OR, 4.19; P = 0.002) were significantly higher. Neither presence of negative T-waves nor GIP pattern was associated with a worse prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with APE, an ischemic ECG pattern on hospital admission, when identified in addition to classic risk markers, is an independent risk factor for worse in-hospital outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25167974     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  4 in total

Review 1.  The value of electrocardiographic abnormalities in the prognosis of pulmonary embolism: a consensus paper.

Authors:  Geneviève C Digby; Piotr Kukla; Zhong-Qun Zhan; Carlos A Pastore; Ryszard Piotrowicz; Edgardo Schapachnik; Wojciech Zareba; Antonio Bayés de Luna; Piotr Pruszczyk; Adrian M Baranchuk
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  The value of electrocardiography in prognosticating clinical deterioration and mortality in acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amro Qaddoura; Geneviève C Digby; Conrad Kabali; Piotr Kukla; Zhong-Qun Zhan; Adrian M Baranchuk
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Clinical Significance of ST Elevation in Lead aVR in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Leili Pourafkari; Samad Ghaffari; Arezou Tajlil; Fariborz Akbarzadeh; Farin Jamali; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Pulseless electrical activity in acute massive pulmonary embolism during thrombolytic therapy.

Authors:  Han-Hua Yu; Jing-Ren Jeng
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.