| Literature DB >> 25167181 |
Jacqueline Alves Torres1, Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues2, Jane Sandall3, Zulmira Hartz4, Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama5, Mariza Miranda Theme Filha5, Arthur Orlando Correa Schilithz5, Maria do Carmo Leal5.
Abstract
This study aims at comparing caesarean section rates and neonatal outcomes of two perinatal models of care provided in private hospitals in Brazil. Birth in Brazil data, a national hospital-based cohort conducted in the years 2011/2012 was used. We analysed 1,664 postpartum women and their offspring attended at 13 hospitals located in the South-east region of Brazil, divided into a "typical"--standard care model and "atypical"--Baby-Friendly hospital with collaborative practices between nurse-midwives and obstetricians on duty to attend deliveries in an alternative labour ward. The Robson's classification system was used to compare caesarean sections, which was lower in the atypical hospital (47.8% vs. 90.8%, p<0.001). Full term birth, early skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding in the first hour, rooming-in care, and discharge in exclusive breastfeeding were more frequent in the atypical hospital. Neonatal adverse outcome did not differ significantly between hospitals. The atypical hospital's intervention should be further evaluated since it might reduce caesarean section prevalence and increase good practices in neonatal care.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25167181 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00129813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cad Saude Publica ISSN: 0102-311X Impact factor: 1.632