Literature DB >> 25166765

Apical adaptation, sealing ability and push-out bond strength of five root-end filling materials.

Pablo Andrés Amoroso-Silva1, Marina Angélica Marciano1, Bruno Martini Guimarães1, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte1, Ana Flavia Sanson1, Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes1.   

Abstract

This study compared the fluid filtration, adaptation to the root canal walls, and the push-out bond strength of two resin-based sealers and three calcium silicate-based retrograde filling materials. Fifty maxillary canines were shaped using manual instruments and the apical portion was sectioned. Retrograde cavities of 3-mm depth were prepared. The specimens were divided into five groups (n = 10): Sealer 26 (S26); MBPc (experimental); MTA; Portland cement with 20% zirconium oxide (PC/ZO), and Portland cement with 20% calcium tungstate (PC/CT). The fluid filtration was measured at 7 and 15 days. To evaluate the interfacial adaptation, sections of the teeth, 1 and 2 mm from the apex, were prepared and the percentage of gaps was calculated. The push-out bond strength at 2 mm from the apex was evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA/Tukey's test (p < 0.05). At 7 and 15 days (p = 0.0048, p = 0.006), the PC/CT group showed higher fluid filtration values when compared to other groups. At 1 mm from the apex, no statistical differences in the adaptation were found among the cements (p = 0.44). At 2 mm from the apex, the PC/ZO group presented statistically lower percentage of gaps than S26, MBPc, and MTA (p = 0.0007). The MBPc group showed higher push-out bond strength than other cements evaluated (p = 0.0008). The fluid filtration and interfacial adaptation of the calcium silicate-based cements were similar to those of the resin-based cements. The resinous cement MBPc showed superior push-out bond strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25166765     DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  6 in total

1.  In Vitro Comparison of Pushout Bond Strength of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine and TheraCal.

Authors:  Neda-Kheirkhah Dabbagh; Ehsan Esnaashari; Hengameh Bakhtiar; Mohammad-Hosein Nekoofar; Milad Ghezelsofla
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 2.  Sealing ability and microbial leakage of root-end filling materials: MTA versus epoxy resin: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mario Dioguardi; Mario Alovisi; Diego Sovereto; Giuseppe Troiano; Giancarlo Malagnino; Michele Di Cosola; Angela Pia Cazzolla; Luigi Laino; Lorenzo Lo Muzio
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-07-07

3.  Apical sealing ability of bioceramic paste and mineral trioxide aggregate retrofillings: a dye leakage study.

Authors:  Shuang Shi; Dan-Dan Zhang; Xu Chen; Zhi-Fan Bao; Ya-Juan Guo
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2015-03-18

4.  Physical evaluation of a new pulp capping material developed from portland cement.

Authors:  Ahmed Negm; Ehab Hassanien; Ashraf Abu-Seida; Mohamed Nagy
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-07-01

Review 5.  Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review.

Authors:  A Clé-Ovejero; E Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-09-01

Review 6.  Portland Cement: An Overview as a Root Repair Material.

Authors:  Shahriar Shahi; Elaheh Fakhri; Hamidreza Yavari; Solmaz Maleki Dizaj; Sara Salatin; Khadijeh Khezri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.