Literature DB >> 25165402

Cost and turn-around time display decreases inpatient ordering of reference laboratory tests: a time series.

Daniel Z Fang1, Gurmeet Sran1, Daniel Gessner1, Pooja D Loftus1, Ann Folkins2, John Y Christopher1, Lisa Shieh1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reference tests, also known as send-out tests, are commonly ordered laboratory tests with variable costs and turn-around times. We aim to examine the effects of displaying reference laboratory costs and turn-around times during computerised physician order entry (CPOE) on inpatient physician ordering behaviour.
DESIGN: We conducted a prospective observational study at a tertiary care hospital involving inpatient attending physicians and residents. Physician ordering behaviour was prospectively observed between September 2010 and December 2012. An intervention was implemented to display cost and turn-around time for reference tests within our CPOE. We examined changes in the mean number of monthly physician orders per inpatient day at risk, the mean cost per order, and the average turn-around time per order.
RESULTS: After our intervention, the mean number of monthly physician orders per inpatient day at risk decreased by 26% (51 vs 38, p<0.0001) with a decrease in mean cost per order (US$146.50 vs US$134.20, p=0.0004). There were no significant differences in mean turn-around time per order (5.6 vs 5.7 days, p=0.057). A stratified analysis of both cost and turn-around time showed significant decreases in physician ordering. The intervention projected a mean annual savings of US$330 439. Reference test cost and turn-around time variables were poorly correlated (r=0.2). These findings occurred in the setting of non-significant change to physician ordering in a control cohort of non-reference laboratory tests.
CONCLUSIONS: Display of reference laboratory cost and turn-around time data during real-time ordering may result in significant decreases in ordering of reference laboratory tests with subsequent cost savings. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness; Decision support, computerized; Hospital medicine; Laboratory medicine; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25165402     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  11 in total

1.  A Randomized Trial of Displaying Paid Price Information on Imaging Study and Procedure Ordering Rates.

Authors:  Alyna T Chien; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Laura A Hatfield; Kate E Koplan; Carter R Petty; Anna D Sinaiko; Meredith B Rosenthal; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Impact of Cost Display on Ordering Patterns for Hospital Laboratory and Imaging Services.

Authors:  Mark T Silvestri; Xiao Xu; Theodore Long; Tasce Bongiovanni; Steven L Bernstein; Sarwat I Chaudhry; Julia I Silvestri; Marilyn Stolar; Erich J Greene; James D Dziura; Cary P Gross; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Delta neutrophil index (DNI) as a novel diagnostic and prognostic marker of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae Hyon Park; Hyeong Ju Byeon; Keum Hwa Lee; Jong Wook Lee; Andreas Kronbichler; Michael Eisenhut; Jae Il Shin
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.575

4.  Displaying Cost and Completion Time for Reference Laboratory Test Orders-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Shohei Ikoma; Logan Pierce; Douglas S Bell; Eric M Cheng; Thomas Drake; Rong Guo; Alyssa Ziman
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.762

5.  The value of delta neutrophil index in young infants with febrile urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Jung Won Lee; Seong Heon Kim; Se Jin Park; Keum Hwa Lee; Jae Hyon Park; Andreas Kronbichler; Michael Eisenhut; Ji Hong Kim; Jong Wook Lee; Jae Il Shin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Predicting Low Information Laboratory Diagnostic Tests.

Authors:  Shivaal K Roy; Jason Hom; Lester Mackey; Neil Shah; Jonathan H Chen
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2018-05-18

Review 7.  Reducing Test Utilization in Hospital Settings: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Renuka S Bindraban; Maarten J Ten Berg; Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Mark H H Kramer; Wouter W Van Solinge; Prabath W B Nanayakkara
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Using Heatmaps to Identify Opportunities for Optimization of Test Utilization and Care Delivery.

Authors:  Yonah C Ziemba; Liya Lomsadze; Yehuda Jacobs; Tylis Y Chang; Nina Haghi
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2018-09-27

9.  Deep into Laboratory: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Recommend Laboratory Tests.

Authors:  Md Mohaimenul Islam; Tahmina Nasrin Poly; Hsuan-Chia Yang; Yu-Chuan Jack Li
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-29

Review 10.  Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Rubinstein; Robert Hirsch; Kakali Bandyopadhyay; Bereneice Madison; Thomas Taylor; Anne Ranne; Millie Linville; Keri Donaldson; Felicitas Lacbawan; Nancy Cornish
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.