Literature DB >> 25164967

[Is automated mechanical reanimation helpful? Putting LUCAS® to the test].

U Janssens1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25164967     DOI： 10.1007/s00063-014-0403-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN： 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  A comparison of CPR delivery with various compression-to-ventilation ratios during two-rescuer CPR.

Authors:  David Hostler; Guy Guimond; Clifton Callaway
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 2.  European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Charles D Deakin; Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Gary Smith
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Clinical consequences of the introduction of mechanical chest compression in the EMS system for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-a pilot study.

Authors:  Christer Axelsson; Johan Nestin; Leif Svensson; Asa B Axelsson; Johan Herlitz
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  David Smekal; Jakob Johansson; Tibor Huzevka; Sten Rubertsson
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 5.  High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.687

6.  Pauses in chest compression and inappropriate shocks: a comparison of manual and semi-automatic defibrillation attempts.

Authors:  Jo Kramer-Johansen; Dana P Edelson; Benjamin S Abella; Lance B Becker; Lars Wik; Petter Andreas Steen
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 7.  Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe.

Authors:  Christie Atwood; Mickey S Eisenberg; Johan Herlitz; Thomas D Rea
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  Survival after cardiac arrest outside hospital in Sweden. Swedish Cardiac Arrest Registry.

Authors:  M Holmberg; S Holmberg; J Herlitz; B Gårdelöv
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial.

Authors:  Sten Rubertsson; Erik Lindgren; David Smekal; Ollie Östlund; Johan Silfverstolpe; Robert A Lichtveld; Rene Boomars; Björn Ahlstedt; Gunnar Skoog; Robert Kastberg; David Halliwell; Martyn Box; Johan Herlitz; Rolf Karlsten
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial.

Authors:  Lars Wik; Jan-Aage Olsen; David Persse; Fritz Sterz; Michael Lozano; Marc A Brouwer; Mark Westfall; Chris M Souders; Reinhard Malzer; Pierre M van Grunsven; David T Travis; Anne Whitehead; Ulrich R Herken; E Brooke Lerner
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 5.262
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.