Ben White1, Lindy Willmott2, Colleen Cartwright3, Malcolm H Parker4, Gail Williams5. 1. Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. bp.white@qut.edu.au. 2. Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 3. School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. 4. School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 5. School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine doctors' level of knowledge of the law on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from adults who lack decision-making capacity, and factors associated with a higher level of knowledge. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Postal survey of all specialists in emergency medicine, geriatric medicine, intensive care, medical oncology, palliative medicine, renal medicine and respiratory medicine on the AMPCo Direct database in New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland. Survey initially posted to participants on 18 July 2012 and closed on 31 January 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical specialists' levels of knowledge about the law, based on their responses to two survey questions. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 32%. For the seven statements contained in the two questions about the law, the mean knowledge score was 3.26 out of 7. State and specialty were the strongest predictors of legal knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Among doctors who practise in the end-of-life field, there are some significant knowledge gaps about the law on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from adults who lack decision-making capacity. Significant consequences for both patients and doctors can flow from a failure to comply with the law. Steps should be taken to improve doctors' legal knowledge in this area and to harmonise the law across Australia.
OBJECTIVES: To examine doctors' level of knowledge of the law on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from adults who lack decision-making capacity, and factors associated with a higher level of knowledge. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Postal survey of all specialists in emergency medicine, geriatric medicine, intensive care, medical oncology, palliative medicine, renal medicine and respiratory medicine on the AMPCo Direct database in New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland. Survey initially posted to participants on 18 July 2012 and closed on 31 January 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical specialists' levels of knowledge about the law, based on their responses to two survey questions. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 32%. For the seven statements contained in the two questions about the law, the mean knowledge score was 3.26 out of 7. State and specialty were the strongest predictors of legal knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Among doctors who practise in the end-of-life field, there are some significant knowledge gaps about the law on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from adults who lack decision-making capacity. Significant consequences for both patients and doctors can flow from a failure to comply with the law. Steps should be taken to improve doctors' legal knowledge in this area and to harmonise the law across Australia.
Authors: Amy Waller; Jamie Bryant; Alison Bowman; Ben P White; Lindy Willmott; Robert Pickles; Carolyn Hullick; Emma Price; Anne Knight; Mary-Ann Ryall; Mathew Clapham; Rob Sanson-Fisher Journal: BMC Med Ethics Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 2.834
Authors: Reetta P Piili; Juho T Lehto; Tiina Luukkaala; Heikki Hinkka; Pirkko-Liisa I Kellokumpu-Lehtinen Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Song Yi Park; Hyun Kim; Kwi Hwa Park; Seung Min Park; Dong Eun Lee; Yong Hun Jung; Wonjoon Jeong; Kyung Hye Park Journal: Korean J Transplant Date: 2022-03-31