Literature DB >> 25164399

The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: implications for design.

Mary Hegarty1.   

Abstract

This paper reviews cognitive science perspectives on the design of visual-spatial displays and introduces the other papers in this topic. It begins by classifying different types of visual-spatial displays, followed by a discussion of ways in which visual-spatial displays augment cognition and an overview of the perceptual and cognitive processes involved in using displays. The paper then argues for the importance of cognitive science methods to the design of visual displays and reviews some of the main principles of display design that have emerged from these approaches to date. Cognitive scientists have had good success in characterizing the performance of well-defined tasks with relatively simple visual displays, but many challenges remain in understanding the use of complex displays for ill-defined tasks. Current research exemplified by the papers in this topic extends empirical approaches to new displays and domains, informs the development of general principles of graphic design, and addresses current challenges in display design raised by the recent explosion in availability of complex data sets and new technologies for visualizing and interacting with these data.
Copyright © 2011 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Keywords:  Design; Graphics; Iconic displays; Relational displays; Visual displays; Visualization

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 25164399     DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01150.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  16 in total

1.  Do Pattern-Focused Visuals Improve Skin Self-Examination Performance? Explicating the Visual Skill Acquisition Model.

Authors:  Kevin K John; Jakob D Jensen; Andy J King; Chelsea L Ratcliff; Douglas Grossman
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-07-31

2.  Best practices for data visualization: creating and evaluating a report for an evidence-based fall prevention program.

Authors:  Srijesa Khasnabish; Zoe Burns; Madeline Couch; Mary Mullin; Randall Newmark; Patricia C Dykes
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department Among Patients With Limited Health Literacy: Beyond Slower and Louder.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Candace D McNaughton; Danielle M McCarthy; Erica Shelton; Ana Castaneda-Guarderas; Angela Young-Brinn; Donna Fowler; Corita Grudszen
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Designing a Consumer-Friendly Radiology Report using a Patient-Centered Approach.

Authors:  Mohammad Alarifi; Timothy Patrick; Abdulrahman Jabour; Min Wu; Jake Luo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.903

5.  Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?

Authors:  Lei Yuan; David Uttal; Steven Franconeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  From hands to minds: Gestures promote understanding.

Authors:  Seokmin Kang; Barbara Tversky
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-09-22

7.  Supporting dynamic change detection: using the right tool for the task.

Authors:  Benoît R Vallières; Helen M Hodgetts; François Vachon; Sébastien Tremblay
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-12-19

8.  On Effective Graphic Communication of Health Inequality: Considerations for Health Policy Researchers.

Authors:  Yukiko Asada; Hannah Abel; Chris Skedgel; Grace Warner
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  Does a presentation's medium affect its message? PowerPoint, Prezi, and oral presentations.

Authors:  Samuel T Moulton; Selen Türkay; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Iterative heuristic design of temporal graphic displays with clinical domain experts.

Authors:  Thomas J Reese; Noa Segall; Guilherme Del Fiol; Joseph E Tonna; Kensaku Kawamoto; Charlene Weir; Melanie C Wright
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 1.977

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.