Literature DB >> 25164300

Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension.

Arthur C Graesser1, Danielle S McNamara.   

Abstract

The proposed multilevel framework of discourse comprehension includes the surface code, the textbase, the situation model, the genre and rhetorical structure, and the pragmatic communication level. We describe these five levels when comprehension succeeds and also when there are communication misalignments and comprehension breakdowns. A computer tool has been developed, called Coh-Metrix, that scales discourse (oral or print) on dozens of measures associated with the first four discourse levels. The measurement of these levels with an automated tool helps researchers track and better understand multilevel discourse comprehension. Two sets of analyses illustrate the utility of Coh-Metrix in discourse theory and educational practice. First, Coh-Metrix was used to measure the cohesion of the text base and situation model, as well as potential extraneous variables, in a sample of published studies that manipulated text cohesion. This analysis helped us better understand what was precisely manipulated in these studies and the implications for discourse comprehension mechanisms. Second, Coh-Metrix analyses are reported for samples of narrative and science texts in order to advance the argument that traditional text difficulty measures are limited because they fail to accommodate most of the levels of the multilevel discourse comprehension framework.
Copyright © 2010 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coherence; Cohesion; Computational linguistics; Discourse processes; Semantics; Text comprehension

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 25164300     DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  13 in total

1.  Assisting students' writing with computer-based concept map feedback: A validation study of the CohViz feedback system.

Authors:  Christian Burkhart; Andreas Lachner; Matthias Nückles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Effects of Student and Text Characteristics on the Oral Reading Fluency of Middle-Grade Students.

Authors:  Amy E Barth; Tammy D Tolar; Jack M Fletcher; David Francis
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2014-02

3.  The Effects of Genetic and Environmental Factors on Writing Development.

Authors:  Florina Erbeli; Sara A Hart; Young-Suk Grace Kim; Jeanette Taylor
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2017-10-18

4.  Concurrent prospective memory task increases mind wandering during online reading for difficult but not easy texts.

Authors:  Teresa Schurer; Bertram Opitz; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-03-01

5.  Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts.

Authors:  Shi Feng; Sidney D'Mello; Arthur C Graesser
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

6.  Reader-Text Interactions: How Differential Text and Question Types Influence Cognitive Skills Needed for Reading Comprehension.

Authors:  Sarah H Eason; Lindsay F Goldberg; Katherine M Young; Megan C Geist; Laurie E Cutting
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2012-08

7.  Participant, rater, and computer measures of coherence in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  David C Rubin; Samantha A Deffler; Christin M Ogle; Nia M Dowell; Arthur C Graesser; Jean C Beckham
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2015-11-02

8.  Novel Approaches to Examine Passage, Student, and Question Effects on Reading Comprehension.

Authors:  Amanda C Miller; Nicole Davis; Jennifer K Gilbert; Sun-Joo Cho; Jessica R Toste; James Street; Laurie E Cutting
Journal:  Learn Disabil Res Pract       Date:  2014-02-01

9.  A Preliminary Investigation of Parent-reported Fiction versus Non-fiction Book Preferences of School-Age Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Meghan M Davidson; Susan Ellis Weismer
Journal:  Autism Dev Lang Impair       Date:  2018-10-09

Review 10.  The Next Frontier in Communication and the ECLIPPSE Study: Bridging the Linguistic Divide in Secure Messaging.

Authors:  Dean Schillinger; Danielle McNamara; Scott Crossley; Courtney Lyles; Howard H Moffet; Urmimala Sarkar; Nicholas Duran; Jill Allen; Jennifer Liu; Danielle Oryn; Neda Ratanawongsa; Andrew J Karter
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.