Literature DB >> 25163454

How do scientists respond to anomalies? Different strategies used in basic and applied science.

Susan Bell Trickett1, J Gregory Trafton, Christian D Schunn.   

Abstract

We conducted two in vivo studies to explore how scientists respond to anomalies. Based on prior research, we identify three candidate strategies: mental simulation, mental manipulation of an image, and comparison between images. In Study 1, we compared experts in basic and applied domains (physics and meteorology). We found that the basic scientists used mental simulation to resolve an anomaly, whereas applied science practitioners mentally manipulated the image. In Study 2, we compared novice and expert meteorologists. We found that unlike experts, novices used comparison to address anomalies. We discuss the nature of expertise in the two kinds of science, the relationship between the type of science and the task performed, and the relationship of the strategies investigated to scientific creativity.
Copyright © 2009 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anomalies; Causal reasoning; Creativity; Diagrammatic reasoning; Expertise; Mental models; Mental simulation; Scientific reasoning

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 25163454     DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01036.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  2 in total

1.  Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty.

Authors:  Joel Chan; Susannah B F Paletz; Christian D Schunn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

2.  Multiple Levels of Heuristic Reasoning Processes in Scientific Model Construction.

Authors:  John J Clement
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.