Literature DB >> 25163379

The impact of Aboriginal status, cigarette smoking and smoking cessation on perinatal outcomes in South Australia.

Nicolette A Hodyl1, Luke E Grzeskowiak2, Michael J Stark3, Wendy Scheil4, Vicki L Clifton2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of Aboriginal status, active cigarette smoking and smoking cessation during pregnancy on perinatal outcomes.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2008.
SETTING: All singleton births in South Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Population-based birth records of pregnancies to Aboriginal women (n = 4245) and non-Aboriginal women (n = 167 746). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes according to Aboriginal status and maternal smoking in pregnancy.
RESULTS: Active cigarette smoking during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, including premature labour (Aboriginal, 1-10 cigarettes per day: aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.28-2.23; non-Aboriginal, 1-10 cigarettes per day: aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.34-1.58), preterm birth (Aboriginal, 1-10 cigarettes per day: aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.14-1.73; non-Aboriginal, 1-10 cigarettes per day: aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.39-1.57), intrauterine growth restriction (Aboriginal, 1-10 cigarettes per day: aOR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.77-3.08; non-Aboriginal, 1-10 cigarettes per day: aOR, 2.65; 95% CI, 2.48-2.83) and small for gestational age (Aboriginal, 1-10 cigarettes per day: aOR, 2.49; 95% CI, 2.06-3.00; non-Aboriginal, 1-10 cigarettes per day: aOR, 2.29; 95% CI, 2.20-2.40). For both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal women who smoked 11 or more cigarettes per day the aOR for these outcomes increased. Smoking cessation in the first trimester reduced these risks to levels comparable with non-smokers. The risk of each adverse outcome was greater in Aboriginal than non-Aboriginal women for all smoking categories; however, interactions between Aboriginal status and smoking were not significant, indicating an equal contribution of smoking to poor outcomes in both populations.
CONCLUSIONS: Smoking cessation or reduction during pregnancy would significantly improve outcomes in both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal women. This should be made a clear priority to improve pregnancy outcomes for all women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25163379     DOI: 10.5694/mja13.11142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  7 in total

1.  Obstetric and Perinatal Morbidity in Northern Tasmanian Aboriginal Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Rashida Hakeem; Amanda Dennis; Kathryn Ogden; Kiran D K Ahuja; Mohammed Abdul Hakeem
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

2.  Early Life Exposure to Nicotine: Postnatal Metabolic, Neurobehavioral and Respiratory Outcomes and the Development of Childhood Cancers.

Authors:  Laiba Jamshed; Genevieve A Perono; Shanza Jamshed; Alison C Holloway
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Relationship of trimester-specific smoking patterns and risk of preterm birth.

Authors:  Elizabeth Moore; Kaitlin Blatt; Aimin Chen; James Van Hook; Emily A DeFranco
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Risk factors associated with RSV hospitalisation in the first 2 years of life, among different subgroups of children in NSW: a whole-of-population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Nusrat Homaira; Kylie-Ann Mallitt; Ju-Lee Oei; Lisa Hilder; Barbara Bajuk; Kei Lui; William Rawlinson; Tom Snelling; Adam Jaffe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Patterns, predictors and outcomes of asthma control and exacerbations during pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Luke E Grzeskowiak; Brian Smith; Anil Roy; Gustaaf A Dekker; Vicki L Clifton
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2016-02-18

6.  Use of cannabis during pregnancy and birth outcomes in an Aboriginal birth cohort: a cross-sectional, population-based study.

Authors:  Stephanie J Brown; Fiona K Mensah; Jackie Ah Kit; Deanna Stuart-Butler; Karen Glover; Cathy Leane; Donna Weetra; Deirdre Gartland; Jonathan Newbury; Jane Yelland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  A composite neonatal adverse outcome indicator using population-based data: an update.

Authors:  S Todd; J Bowen; I Ibiebele; J Patterson; S Torvaldsen; F Ford; M Nippita; J Morris; D Randall
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2020-08-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.