Literature DB >> 25162652

Caloric expenditure of aerobic, resistance, or combined high-intensity interval training using a hydraulic resistance system in healthy men.

Paul H Falcone1, Chih-Yin Tai, Laura R Carson, Jordan M Joy, Matt M Mosman, Tyler R McCann, Kevin P Crona, Michael P Kim, Jordan R Moon.   

Abstract

Although exercise regimens vary in content and duration, few studies have compared the caloric expenditure of multiple exercise modalities with the same duration. The purpose of this study was to compare the energy expenditure of single sessions of resistance, aerobic, and combined exercise with the same duration. Nine recreationally active men (age: 25 ± 7 years; height: 181.6 ± 7.6 cm; weight: 86.6 ± 7.5 kg) performed the following 4 exercises for 30 minutes: a resistance training session using 75% of their 1-repetition maximum (1RM), an endurance cycling session at 70% maximum heart rate (HRmax), an endurance treadmill session at 70% HRmax, and a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) session on a hydraulic resistance system (HRS) that included repeating intervals of 20 seconds at maximum effort followed by 40 seconds of rest. Total caloric expenditure, substrate use, heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. Caloric expenditure was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater when exercising with the HRS (12.62 ± 2.36 kcal·min), compared with when exercising with weights (8.83 ± 1.55 kcal·min), treadmill (9.48 ± 1.30 kcal·min), and cycling (9.23 ± 1.25 kcal·min). The average HR was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater with the HRS (156 ± 9 b·min), compared with that using weights (138 ± 16 b·min), treadmill (137 ± 5 b·min), and cycle (138 ± 6 b·min). Similarly, the average RPE was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher with the HRS (16 ± 2), compared with that using weights (13 ± 2), treadmill (10 ± 2), and cycle (11 ± 1). These data suggest that individuals can burn more calories performing an HIIT session with an HRS than spending the same amount of time performing a steady-state exercise session. This form of exercise intervention may be beneficial to individuals who want to gain the benefits of both resistance and cardiovascular training but have limited time to dedicate to exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25162652     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  High-intensity resistance exercise is not as effective as traditional high-intensity interval exercise for increasing the cardiorespiratory response and energy expenditure in recreationally active subjects.

Authors:  Laura Järvinen; Sofi Lundin Petersdotter; Thomas Chaillou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Resistance Training Contribute to the Aerobic Components of an Exercise Session in Adults but not as Much in Older Adults.

Authors:  Neha Bharti; Travis Hrubeniuk; Andrea Mayo; Martin Sénéchal; Danielle R Bouchard
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2017-05-01

3.  Description of training loads using whole-body exercise during high-intensity interval training.

Authors:  Alexandre F Machado; Alexandre L Evangelista; João Marcelo Q Miranda; Cauê V La Scala Teixeira; Roberta Luksevicius Rica; Charles R Lopes; Aylton Figueira-Júnior; Julien S Baker; Danilo S Bocalini
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 4.  Using Exercise and Nutrition to Alter Fat and Lean Mass in Men with Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Rebekah L Wilson; Dennis R Taaffe; Robert U Newton; Nicolas H Hart; Philippa Lyons-Wall; Daniel A Galvão
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.