Literature DB >> 25162406

Treatment of tibial eminence fractures: a systematic review.

Ljiljana Bogunovic1, Majd Tarabichi1, David Harris1, Rick Wright1.   

Abstract

Fractures of the tibial eminence are rare, accounting for less than 1% of the injuries involving the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Most agree that nondisplaced fractures can be managed nonoperatively, but debate exists over the ideal treatment of displaced fractures. This systematic review evaluates the outcome of nonoperatively and operatively managed displaced tibial eminence fractures. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried. Inclusion criteria included reported outcomes of displaced tibial eminence fractures, minimum 2-year follow-up, and English language. Outcomes reported were pooled and included the following: clinical instability (Lachman/anterior drawer, pivot shift, and KT 1000), patient-reported pain and/or instability, return to sport, Lysholm, Tegner, and the need for ACL reconstruction. Comparison was made in the outcomes of nonoperatively and operatively treated fractures and between suture and screw fixation techniques. Overall 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled mean age was 23 years and mean follow-up was 35 months. Clinical instability was seen in 70% of nonoperatively treated patients and 14% of operatively treated patients (p < 0.0001). Patient-reported instability was higher in nonoperatively treated patients (54 vs. 1.2%, p < 0.0001), as was the rate of ACL reconstruction (10 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.036). In comparing suture fixation to screw fixation, patient-reported instability and the rate of ACL reconstruction were equivalent. Patients treated with screw fixation had a higher incidence of clinically measured instability (Lachman and KT arthrometer) and an increased rate of hardware removal (3.9 vs. 64.9%, p < 0.05). Surgically managed patients report less instability, are higher functioning, and require fewer ACL reconstructions when compared with nonoperatively treated patients. Suture fixation was associated with improvements in clinical measures of stability and decreased need for hardware removal; however, patient perception of stability and need for ACL reconstruction was no different between the two treatment methods. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25162406     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1388657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  15 in total

1.  Meniscal injuries in children and adolescents undergoing surgical treatment for tibial eminence fractures.

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Peter U Brucker; Carlo Camathias; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Michael T Hirschmann; Stephan Lorenz; Hermann O Mayr; Philipp Minzlaff; Wolf Petersen; Tim Saier; Dorien Schneidmüller; Amelie Stoehr; Daniel Wagner; Norbert P Südkamp; Philipp Niemeyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopically assisted cannulated screw fixation for tibial eminence fracture in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Chang Ho Shin; Doo Jae Lee; In Ho Choi; Tae-Joon Cho; Won Joon Yoo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Knee Extension Does Not Reliably Reduce Acute Type II Tibial Spine Fractures: MRI Evaluation of Displacement During Extension Versus Resting Flexion.

Authors:  Peter C Cannamela; Noah J Quinlan; Travis G Maak; Temitope F Adeyemi; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-18

4.  Pediatric Type II Tibial Spine Fractures: Addressing the Treatment Controversy With a Mixed-Effects Model.

Authors:  Alexander J Adams; Nathan N O'Hara; Joshua M Abzug; Julien T Aoyama; Theodore J Ganley; James L Carey; Aristides I Cruz; Henry B Ellis; Peter D Fabricant; Daniel W Green; Benton E Heyworth; Joseph A Janicki; Mininder S Kocher; John T R Lawrence; R Jay Lee; Scott D McKay; R Justin Mistovich; Neeraj M Patel; John D Polousky; Jason T Rhodes; Brant C Sachleben; M Catherine Sargent; Gregory A Schmale; Kevin G Shea; Yi-Meng Yen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-08-28

5.  Suture Versus Screw Fixation of Tibial Spine Fractures in Children and Adolescents: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Mark Callanan; Judd Allen; Brett Flutie; Francis Tepolt; Patricia E Miller; Dennis Kramer; Mininder S Kocher
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-11-22

6.  A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Authors:  Michael J Anderson; William M Browning; Christopher E Urband; Melissa A Kluczynski; Leslie J Bisson
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-03-15

7.  The Adjustable Locking Suspension Sling Technique for Fixation of the Tibial Eminence Fracture in Adolescents.

Authors:  Mohamed Aboalata; Ahmed Almohandes; Osama Abunar; Moheib S Ahmed; Andreas B Imhoff; Yehia Bassiouny
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2018-04-16

8.  Arthroscopic Suture Fixation of Comminuted Tibial Eminence Fractures: Hybrid All-Epiphyseal Bone Tunnel and Knotless Anchor Technique.

Authors:  Joseph C Fox; Michael G Saper
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-10-07

9.  Arthroscopic treatment of tibial eminence fractures using double-loop endobutton device: Surgical technique and short-term treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Ahmet Yıldırım; Bahattin Kerem Aydın; Sadettin Çiftci; Ali Güleç
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2020

10.  Arthroscopic treatment of adult displaced tibial eminence fractures with anchor and pushlock fixation.

Authors:  Defu Yu; Runze Yu; Jiebin Zhang; Tao Chen; Biao Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.