DNA polymerase (pol) ι is the most error-prone among the Y-family polymerases that participate in translesion synthesis (TLS). Pol ι can bypass various DNA lesions, e.g., N(2)-ethyl(Et)G, O(6)-methyl(Me)G, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG), and an abasic site, though frequently with low fidelity. We assessed the biochemical effects of six reported genetic variations of human pol ι on its TLS properties, using the recombinant pol ι (residues 1-445) proteins and DNA templates containing a G, N(2)-EtG, O(6)-MeG, 8-oxoG, or abasic site. The Δ1-25 variant, which is the N-terminal truncation of 25 residues resulting from an initiation codon variant (c.3G > A) and also is the formerly misassigned wild-type, exhibited considerably higher polymerase activity than wild-type with Mg(2+) (but not with Mn(2+)), coinciding with its steady-state kinetic data showing a ∼10-fold increase in kcat/Km for nucleotide incorporation opposite templates (only with Mg(2+)). The R96G variant, which lacks a R96 residue known to interact with the incoming nucleotide, lost much of its polymerase activity, consistent with the kinetic data displaying 5- to 72-fold decreases in kcat/Km for nucleotide incorporation opposite templates either with Mg(2+) or Mn(2+), except for that opposite N(2)-EtG with Mn(2+) (showing a 9-fold increase for dCTP incorporation). The Δ1-25 variant bound DNA 20- to 29-fold more tightly than wild-type (with Mg(2+)), but the R96G variant bound DNA 2-fold less tightly than wild-type. The DNA-binding affinity of wild-type, but not of the Δ1-25 variant, was ∼7-fold stronger with 0.15 mM Mn(2+) than with Mg(2+). The results indicate that the R96G variation severely impairs most of the Mg(2+)- and Mn(2+)-dependent TLS abilities of pol ι, whereas the Δ1-25 variation selectively and substantially enhances the Mg(2+)-dependent TLS capability of pol ι, emphasizing the potential translational importance of these pol ι genetic variations, e.g., individual differences in TLS, mutation, and cancer susceptibility to genotoxic carcinogens.
DNA polymerase (pol) ι is the most error-prone among the Y-family polymerases that participate in translesion synthesis (TLS). Pol ι can bypass various DNA lesions, e.g., N(2)-ethyl(Et)G, O(6)-methyl(Me)G, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG), and an abasic site, though frequently with low fidelity. We assessed the biochemical effects of six reported genetic variations of human pol ι on its TLS properties, using the recombinant pol ι (residues 1-445) proteins and DNA templates containing a G, N(2)-EtG, O(6)-MeG, 8-oxoG, or abasic site. The Δ1-25 variant, which is the N-terminal truncation of 25 residues resulting from an initiation codon variant (c.3G > A) and also is the formerly misassigned wild-type, exhibited considerably higher polymerase activity than wild-type with Mg(2+) (but not with Mn(2+)), coinciding with its steady-state kinetic data showing a ∼10-fold increase in kcat/Km for nucleotide incorporation opposite templates (only with Mg(2+)). The R96G variant, which lacks a R96 residue known to interact with the incoming nucleotide, lost much of its polymerase activity, consistent with the kinetic data displaying 5- to 72-fold decreases in kcat/Km for nucleotide incorporation opposite templates either with Mg(2+) or Mn(2+), except for that opposite N(2)-EtG with Mn(2+) (showing a 9-fold increase for dCTP incorporation). The Δ1-25 variant bound DNA 20- to 29-fold more tightly than wild-type (with Mg(2+)), but the R96G variant bound DNA 2-fold less tightly than wild-type. The DNA-binding affinity of wild-type, but not of the Δ1-25 variant, was ∼7-fold stronger with 0.15 mM Mn(2+) than with Mg(2+). The results indicate that the R96G variation severely impairs most of the Mg(2+)- and Mn(2+)-dependent TLS abilities of pol ι, whereas the Δ1-25 variation selectively and substantially enhances the Mg(2+)-dependent TLS capability of pol ι, emphasizing the potential translational importance of these pol ι genetic variations, e.g., individual differences in TLS, mutation, and cancer susceptibility to genotoxic carcinogens.
DNA damage is constantly
generated from endogenous and exogenous
sources in cells and poses a major obstacle to vital cellular processes
of replication and transcription, possibly leading to mutation and
cell death. To cope with the constant threat of DNA damage, cells
are equipped with a sophisticated network of DNA damage response systems,
including DNA repair mechanisms, damage tolerance processes, and cell-cycle
checkpoints.[1,2] Such systems should ideally have
high fidelity, efficiency, and coordination with each other to preserve
genome integrity, but these properties are not perfect nor the same
for all lesions. Sometimes the attempts at repair can result in genomic
errors and cell apoptosis. Inherited defects in human DNA damage response
machineries (e.g., XPC, POLH, ATM) cause the faulty repair, damage
tolerance, and checkpoints and commonly result in severe cancer predisposition
disorders along with other different disease phenotypes.[3,4] Reduced DNA repair capacity and related genetic variations have
been shown to be associated with enhanced cancer risks in human individuals.[5−8] Along the same line, it can be speculated that the differential
cellular capacity for DNA damage tolerance influences the final biological
outcomes from residual genomic lesions and thus could be a determining
factor for mutation and cancer predisposition in individuals.Persistent unrepaired DNA lesions can interfere with DNA replication,
which can lead to replication fork stalling and copying errors. As
a prompt response to the lesion-blocked replication fork, cells are
able to utilize a DNA damage tolerance system involving specialized
translesion polymerases, mostly belonging to the Y-Family, which overcomes
DNA lesions and performs translesion synthesis (TLS). TLS is a potentially
mutagenic process due to the low fidelity of TLS polymerases with
lesions in many cases, while serving to avoid the permanent cell cycle
arrest and cell death. Indeed, each Y-Family polymerase can carry
out its unique TLS, varying in both efficiency and fidelity depending
on the type, size, and location of the lesion.[9] Therefore, individual TLS polymerases may play distinctive roles,
i.e., protective (error-free), provocative (error-prone), or neutral,
in mutagenesis induced by each specific DNA lesion in cells. For instance,
both pol κ and REV1 can perform error-free and efficient TLS
at bulky N2-guanine (G) lesions, such
as benzo[a]pyrene-derived N2-G adducts but pol η and pol ι perform relatively
error-prone TLS (albeit yielding different types of errors) at those
adducts,[10−13] suggesting error-free roles for the former two pols but error-prone
roles for the latter two pols in TLS (at least regarding bulky carcinogen-bound N2-G adducts). In these circumstances, it can
be postulated that the overall cellular TLS capacity, comprising behaviors
of multiple individual polymerases employed against carcinogen-specific
DNA lesions, will determine the levels of lesion-derived mutations
in the newly synthesized genome and thus play a role in preventing
or facilitating mutagenesis resulting from genotoxic carcinogens in
cells, which could further relate to cancer susceptibility in individuals.DNA polymerase (pol) ι, a member of human Y-family DNA polymerases,
has been known to perform TLS at various DNA lesions although it has
the lowest fidelity in DNA synthesis among polymerases. Pol ι
is inherently very error-prone in nucleotide insertion, particularly
opposite undamaged template bases G and T, respectively, yielding
misinsertion of either dTTP or dGTP at a frequency of about 0.1 and
1 (relative to the correct nucleotide insertion), which is ascribed
to its unique active site and related non-Watson–Crick base
pairing.[14−16] Pol ι is able to mediate relatively mutagenic
but occasionally accurate replicative bypass with a variety of DNA
lesions, including minor-groove N2-G adducts,
major-groove O6-G adducts, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroG
(8-oxoG), pyrimidine dimers, and abasic lesions, with different nucleotide
selectivities according to lesion types. Pol ι inserts both
dCTP and dTTP opposite N2-G and O6-G adducts, with a slight preference of either
dCTP or dTTP, respectively.[17] Pol ι
slightly prefers dCTP over dGTP for insertion opposite 8-oxoG, prefers
dATP opposite the 3′ T (but both dGTP and dTTP opposite 5′
T) of (6–4) TT photoproducts, and slightly prefers to insert
dTTP and dGTP opposite abasic lesions.[18,19] Pol ι
is distinctively known to prefer Mn2+ over Mg2+ ions as a metal in polymerase catalysis and is maximally active
at low concentrations (0.05–0.25 mM) of Mn2+.[20]Substantial evidence suggests a possible
implication of pol ι
in cancer in mammals. Pol ι deficiency results in a higher susceptibility
to UV-induced skin cancers in mice under pol η-null conditions,[21,22] and the loss of pol ι increases urethane-induced lung mutagenesis
and tumorigenesis in C57BL/6J pol ι-knockout mice.[23] Dysregulation of pol ι is also found in
many types of cancers. Pol ι is overexpressed in various types
of cancerous tissues or cells including breast, prostate, uterus,
stomach, rectal, esophageal, and bladder cancers,[24−27] which might hypothetically lead
to a mutator phenotype due to an elevated error-prone DNA replication.
Two germline POLI single nucleotide variations (SNVs),
which might result in a missense change at codon 532 or 731 located
in the ubiquitin-binding motifs, have been associated with a significantly
higher risk of some subsets of lung and prostate cancers, respectively,
although their specific mechanisms have not been elucidated yet.[28,29] On the basis of these circumstances, we can infer that pol ι
would serve a protective (or sometimes facilitative) role in genomic
mutagenesis induced by genotoxic agents in cells, and the altered
status of pol ι function by genetic variation might affect individual
risks of mutation and cancer from exposure to certain genotoxic carcinogens.The humanPOLI gene encodes the pol ι protein
consisting of 740 amino acids according to NCBI GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/), which has the additional
N-terminal 25 residues to the formerly erroneously designated open-reading
frame (ORF) amino acid sequence. For such a reason, most of the previous
biochemical and structural experiments on pol ι were performed
using the sequence information on the N-terminal truncated (25-amino
acids-shorter) ORF. The catalytic core of pol ι is positioned
in the N-terminal region (amino acids 26–445), and its ternary
complex crystal structure has been determined.[14] However, biochemical properties of the new wild-type pol
ι, as well as the effect of the extra 25 amino acids (containing
12 acidic residues) added at the N-terminus, on pol ι function,
have not been reported. Until the present time, a total of ∼122
germline variations in POLI gene have been described
for human individuals in dbSNP (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP), but the functional impacts of these genetic variations have not
been biochemically evaluated yet. Biochemical approaches to evaluate
the effects of germline genetic variations on pol ι function
are indispensable for understanding and predicting their mechanistic
basis and biological outcomes either before or after studying their
clinical associations. In this study, we focused on the nonsynonymous
coding POLI gene variations, which are located in
the polymerase core domains and the N-terminal 25 amino acids region,
and predicted to have damaging effects by in silico prediction analysis tools, e.g., SIFT and PolyPhen,[30−32] because they would be likely to affect the catalytic function of
pol ι and change its TLS function. In order to characterize
the putatively functional genetic variations of human pol ι,
we investigated the biochemical effects of six selected missense or
deletion genetic variations on the enzymatic properties of human pol
ι regarding both normal DNA synthesis and bypass of various
DNA lesions. We performed the experiments with “standing-start”
full-length primer extensions, steady-state kinetics, and pol-DNA
binding in the presence of either Mg2+ or Mn2+ ions, using wild-type recombinant human pol ι (1–445
amino acids) and six variants with primer-annealed oligonucleotide
DNA templates containing an undamaged G, N2-ethyl(Et)G, O6-methyl(Me)G, 8-oxoG,
or abasic site. Here we describe two germline genetic variations that
can alter in vitro enzyme function of pol ι
in nucleotide incorporation with normal and lesion DNA substrates,
as well as DNA substrate binding. These observations are discussed
in the context of understanding the possible mechanistic and functional
aspects of altered TLS with pol ι variants.
Experimental Procedures
Materials
T4 polynucleotide kinase,
restriction endonucleases,
and dNTPs were purchased from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA). [γ-32P]ATP (specific activity 3 × 103 Ci/mmol)
was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA). Biospin
columns were purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). A protease inhibitor
cocktail was obtained from Roche Applied Science (Indianapolis, IN).
The vector pBG101 was gratefully obtained from the Center for Structural
Biology, Vanderbilt University. The pCR2.1-TOPO TA cloning kit was
from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA), and the QuickChange mutagenesis kit
was from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). FPLC columns were purchased from
GE Healthcare (Uppsala, Sweden).
DNA Substrates
24-Mer (5′-GCC TCG AGC CAG CCG
CAG ACG CAG-3′) and 36-mer (3′-CGG AGC TCG GTC GGC GTC
TGC GTC XCT CCT GCG GCT-5′; X = G, O6-MeG, or tetrahydrofuran (abasic site analogue)) oligonucleotides
containing a G, O6-MeG, or abasic site
(stable tetrahydrofuran derivative) were obtained from Midland Certified
Reagent Co. (Midland, TX). A 36-mer (X = N2-EtG) containing N2-EtG was prepared
as previously described.[33] A 36-mer (X
= 8-oxoG) containing an 8-oxoG, and an 18-FAM-mer (5′-(FAM)-AGC
CAG CCG CAG ACG CAG-3′; FAM = 6-carboxyfluorescein) were obtained
from Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea). Primers (24-mers) were 5′ end-labeled
using T4 polynucleotide kinase with [γ-32P]ATP and
annealed with 36-mer templates to make duplex primer-template DNA
substrates for use in polymerase activity assays. 18-FAM-mer primers
were annealed with 36-G-mer templates for use in DNA binding assays.
Selection of Human POLI Gene Variations Having
Potentially Functional Impact
We searched for humanPOLI gene variations that are highly likely to alter enzyme
function. First, we screened the naturally occurring germ-line genetic
variations in the protein-coding sequence of the POLI gene from the public database dbSNP (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP). We selected four candidate variations to be likely dysfunctional
based on three criteria: (i) nonsynonymous coding variations that
cause a missense or nonsense change, (ii) variations located in the
polymerase core domain (amino acid residues 1 to 445), and (iii) missense
variations predicted to be deleterious or damaging on protein function
by SIFT and Polyphen.[30−32] We also included two more candidate variations, which
cause the initiation codon change or an amino acid deletion and thus
might exert functional changes. Thus, we selected six variants (i.e.,
a deletion, an initiator codon, and four missense variants) and performed
detailed biochemical analyses using the corresponding recombinant
protein pol ι1–445 proteins purified from Escherichia coli. Current information for the six POLI gene variations included in this study is summarized
in Table 1, based on public databases, e.g.,
dbSNP, 1000 genomes (http://browser.1000genomes.org).
Table 1
POLI Gene Variations
Studied
predictionb
rs IDa
nucleotide change
amino acid change
protein domain
minor allele frequency
SIFT
PolyPhen-2
rs199757163
c.3G > A
M1_A25del (Δ1–25)c
0.001d
N/Ae
N/A
rs10584411
c.51_53del
D17del (ΔD17)
0.747d
N/A
N/A
rs3218778
c.286A > G
R96G
finger
0.006f
damaging
probably damaging
rs3218784
c.783A > G
I261M
thumb
0.011d
damaging
possibly damaging
rs3218783
c.826G > A
E276K
thumb
0.0005d
damaging
possibly damaging
rs11558769
c.1120T > A
Y374N
PAD
N/A
damaging
benign
A reference SNP identification number
provided by dbSNP.
Possible
functional effects of genetic
variations are predicted in silico using SIFT and
PolyPhen-2.[30−32]
The Greek
symbol Δ denotes
a deletion.
From 1000 Genomes
project.
Not available.
From NIHPDR and PDR90 resources
described in dbSNP.
A reference SNP identification number
provided by dbSNP.Possible
functional effects of genetic
variations are predicted in silico using SIFT and
PolyPhen-2.[30−32]The Greek
symbol Δ denotes
a deletion.From 1000 Genomes
project.Not available.From NIHPDR and PDR90 resources
described in dbSNP.
Construction
of Expression Vectors for Core Proteins of Wild-type
Pol ι and Six Variants
The gene fragments covering
the core proteins (amino acids 1–445) of wild-type pol ι
and the Δ1–25 variant were obtained by PCR amplification
from human testis cDNA (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) as template using
AccuTaq LA DNA polymerase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) with a forward primer
(5′-GAA TCC ATG GAG AAG CTG GGG GTG G-3′ for wild-type
or 5′-GAA TCC ATG GAG TCG GCA GAG GGT GTG-3′ for Δ1–25)
and a reverse primer (5′-CTA CTT AGC AGT ATT TAG TGC-3′).
Each of the resulting PCR products of 1.3 kb POLI core was cloned into the vector pCR2.1-TOPO, and the nucleotide sequences
of pol ι gene inserts for wild-type and Δ1–25 were
confirmed. From the nucleotide sequencing of wild-type gene inserts,
we obtained two kinds of vectors encoding the wild-type or ΔD17
variant pol ι(1–445), indicating that ΔD17 variation
is very common in the human population. Each of the POLI gene fragments were then cloned into the BamHI
and EcoRI sites of the vector pBG101, which can generate
the pBG101-wtPOLI1–445, and two vectors encoding
the Δ1–25 or ΔD17 pol ι(1–445) variant.
Each of the four different mutations in the POLI gene
was created by a QuickChange mutagenesis kit with the pBG101-wtPOLI1–445 vector as template. The oligonucleotide primers
for introducing the point mutations in POLI were
5′-GGT TAC CTG CAA CTA TGA AGC TGG GAA ACT TGG AG-3′
for R96G, 5′-CTT ATT CAT AGT TTG AAT CAC ATG AAG GAA ATA CCT
GGT ATT GGC-3′ for I261M, 5′-CCA AAT GTC TTA AAG CAC
TGG GTA TCA ATA GTG TGC G-3′ for E276K, 5′-GTG AGA TTA
ATA ATC CGT CGG AAT TCC TCT GAG AAG C-3′ for Y374N, and the
corresponding antiparallel primer for each mutation. All four substitutions
were confirmed by nucleotide sequence analyses of the constructed
vectors.
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Proteins
The wild-type and variant forms of recombinant pol ι core proteins
were expressed in E. coli strainBL21(DE3) cells. E. coli harboring each vector for the recombinant protein
were grown in Luria–Bertani broth supplemented with kanamycin
(50 μg mL–1) at 37 °C, with aeration,
to an OD600 of 0.6. Isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside was added to 0.2 mM, and incubation
was continued for 14 h at 16 °C. The cells were harvested by
centrifugation and resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.4, containing 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol (v/v), 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol,
1 mg lysozyme mL–1, and protease inhibitor cocktail),
cooled on ice for 30 min, and then lysed by sonication (12 ×
10 s duration with a Branson digital sonifier microtip, (VWR, West
Chester, PA), 45% amplitude, with intermittent cooling time). The
cell lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 4 × 104 × g for 60 min at 4 °C. The resulting
supernatant was loaded onto a 1 mL GSTrap 4B column, and the column
was washed with 20 mL of Buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing
150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol (v/v), and 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol).
GST-tagged pol ι core bound on the column was cleaved by Prescission
Protease for 14 h at 4 °C. Cleaved pol ι core fractions
(eluted with Buffer A) were collected and diluted 6-fold with buffer
B (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol (v/v), and 5 mM
β-mercaptoethanol). Pol ι core was further purified to
near homogeneity with the use of a Mono S column and a 50 mM to 2
M NaCl gradient in buffer B. Pol ι core was eluted at ∼250
mM NaCl. Protein concentrations were estimated using a Bradford protein
assay, and the quality of purified proteins was assessed by SDS-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis and Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining (Figure
S1, Supporting Information).
DNA Polymerization
Assays and Steady-State Kinetic Analysis
Standard DNA polymerase
reactions of 8 μL were performed
in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) buffer containing 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM dithiothreitol,
100 μg mL–1 bovine serum albumin (BSA) (w/v),
and 10% glycerol (v/v) with 100 nM primer-template substrate at 37
°C. Reactions were initiated by the addition of dNTPs with MgCl2 (5 mM final concentration) or MnCl2 (0.15 mM final
concentration) to preincubated enzyme/DNA mixtures and terminated
with six volumes of a solution of 20 mM EDTA in 95% formamide (v/v).
For steady-state kinetic analysis, the primer-template was extended
in the presence of 0.1–33 nM pol ι enzyme (or up to 400
nM enzyme for R96G) with increasing concentrations of individual dNTPs
for 10 min, when the maximum amount of extension products was ≤20%
of total DNA substrates. Products were resolved using a 16% polyacrylamide
(w/v) gel electrophoresis system containing 8 M urea and visualized
using a Bio-Rad Personal Molecular Imager and Quantity One software
(Bio-Rad). The product formation rates (as a function of dNTP concentration)
were plotted to estimate the kinetic parameters Km and kcat by nonlinear regression
fitting to the Michaelis–Menten equation using Graph Pad Prism
5.0 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Misinsertion frequency (fins) opposite G or G adducts was calculated
as fins = (kcat/Km)dNTP/(kcat/Km)dCTP.[34]
Fluorescence Polarization Experiments
The 2 nM 18-FAM-mer
primer annealed with unmodified 36-mer template was incubated with
varying concentrations of pol ι, and fluorescence polarization
(FP) was measured with a Biotek Synergy NEO plate reader (Winooski,
VT) using excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 and 528 nm, respectively.
The polymerase-DNA binding reaction was done in the presence of 50
mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) containing 10 mM potassium acetate, 10 mM
KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol, and 0.1 mg mL–1 BSA in the presence of MgCl2 or MnCl2 (final 0.15 or 1 mM concentration), as modified from a previous
study.[35] FP data were plotted vs enzyme
concentration and fit to a quadratic equation to estimate Kd,DNA using the equation: P = P0 + (Pmax – P0)((Dt + Et + Kd,DNA) – ((Dt + Et + Kd,DNA)2 – (4DtEt))1/2)/(2Dt),
where P is the measured change in polarization (in
units of millipolarization (mP)), P0 is
initial polarization (DNA alone), Pmax is maximum polarization, Dt is DNA concentration, Et is enzyme concentration, and Kd,DNA is the equilibrium dissociation constant for enzyme
binding to DNA.
Results
Overall Study Approach
The aim of this study was to
analyze the potentially dysfunctional germ-line genetic variants of
human pol ι and identify functional pol ι variants. To
achieve this, we first screened for humanPOLI genetic
variations likely to alter the enzymatic function of pol ι from
the dbSNP database. We utilized the new annotated open reading frame
(ORF) sequence of the POLI gene as described in GenBank
accession number NM_007195 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/), which encodes a pol ι protein of 740 amino acids with an
additional 25 amino acids at the N-terminus compared
to the previous wild-type, in that the previous ORF of pol ι
was erroneously annotated to start at a site 75 bases downstream of
the actual translational initiation site.[36] We picked four candidate variations by searching for nonsynonymous
coding variations that are located in the polymerase core domains
(finger, palm, thumb, and little finger) and are also predicted as
damaging with prediction tools (SIFT and PolyPhen). The SIFT algorithm
utilizes a sequence homology-based approach to classify amino acid
substitutions, which is based on the evolutionary conservation of
the amino acids within protein families,[30] while the PolyPhen algorithm uses both sequence- and structure-based
prediction.[31,32] The R96G variation (close to
the incoming nucleotide at the finger domain) and the I261M and E276K
variations (in the thumb domain) were predicted to be damaging by
both SIFT and PolyPhen, while the Y374N variation in the little finger
domain was predicted to be damaging only by SIFT (Table 1 and Figure 1). We also selected two
more candidate variations that would result in an altered translation
initiation or an amino acid deletion at the N-terminal extension of
25 amino acids (Table 1 and Figure 1), one of which is the initiator codon variation
(c.3G > A) to mutate the start codon (ATG) to a nonstart codon
(ATA)
and thus theoretically yield the variant protein deleted of the first
25 N-terminal residues (Δ1–25) that
was previously referred to the wild-type enzyme. After that, we investigated
the biochemical impact of six genetic variations on the enzymatic
features of pol ι in both normal and translesion DNA synthesis
at G and various DNA lesions. To effectively observe the alterations
of polymerase function in six selected pol ι variants of the
polymerase core domains, we utilized the core protein (amino acids
1–445) of pol ι, which contains all the polymerase core
domains critical to polymerase activity. The previous core protein
(26–445) was also shown to have the similar polymerase activity
to the previous full-length pol ι (26–740).[37] A set of experiments, including “standing-start”
full-length primer extensions, steady-state kinetics of nucleotide
incorporation opposite the lesions, and pol ι-DNA binding assays,
was carried out successively using the recombinant core (1–445
amino acids) of pol ι enzymes and oligonucleotides containing
a normal G or each of four bypassable DNA lesions, i.e., N2-EtG, O6-MeG, 8-oxoG, or
abasic site at a defined site. We also compared the effects of two
metals—Mn2+ and Mg2+—in these
experiments because pol ι is known to prefer Mn2+ to Mg2+ in polymerase catalysis.[20]
Figure 1
Locations
of genetic pol ι variations. Structure of human
pol ι(26–445) (PDB code, 2FLL) bound to primer/template DNA and incoming
nucleotide is shown using Pymol. Pol ι(26–445) is shown
in cartoon ribbons, and the primer/template DNA and nucleotide are
shown in gray sticks. The finger, palm, thumb, and PAD domains are
colored yellow, red, green, and blue, respectively. The amino acid
residues (in purple spheres) of genetic pol ι variants are indicated.
The structural domains of pol ι are shown in the upper schematic
diagram using DOG (version 2.0),[60] where
positions of amino acids related to six studied variations are indicated.
Locations
of genetic pol ι variations. Structure of human
pol ι(26–445) (PDB code, 2FLL) bound to primer/template DNA and incoming
nucleotide is shown using Pymol. Pol ι(26–445) is shown
in cartoon ribbons, and the primer/template DNA and nucleotide are
shown in gray sticks. The finger, palm, thumb, and PAD domains are
colored yellow, red, green, and blue, respectively. The amino acid
residues (in purple spheres) of genetic pol ι variants are indicated.
The structural domains of pol ι are shown in the upper schematic
diagram using DOG (version 2.0),[60] where
positions of amino acids related to six studied variations are indicated.
Primer Extension across
G and DNA Lesions with All Four dNTPs
by Wild-Type and Variant Pol ι Enzymes in the Presence of MgCl2
To evaluate the possible changes in Mg2+-dependent DNA polymerase activities of six human pol ι variants
at undamaged and damaged DNA templates, we performed “standing-start”
primer extensions with the wild-type and variant pol ι proteins
using 24-mer/36-mer duplexes containing a G, N2-EtG, O6-MeG, 8-oxoG, or abasic
site at position 25 of the template in the presence of all four dNTPs
and 5 mM MgCl2 (Figure 2). Those
four DNA adducts, which were previously found to be bypassed relatively
efficiently by human pol ι,[11,17,19,38] were selected as the
favored substrate lesions of pol ι. Wild-type pol ι extended
about half of the primers past G and yielded mainly one-base extended
25-mer products with some traces of 26- and 27-mers (with a 50 nM
enzyme concentration), and this pattern was also observed with the
ΔD17, I261M, E276K, and Y374N variants. However, the Δ1–25
variant readily synthesized products mainly up to 27- and 28-mers
and seemed much more effective than the wild-type enzyme. In contrast,
the R96G variant generated almost no extension at G even with a 50
nM enzyme concentration, indicating severe impairment of polymerase
activity due to this amino acid substitution. For translesion synthesis
at N2-EtG, O6-MeG, 8-oxoG, or an abasic lesion, those six variants showed a similar
trend of results as that observed with an undamaged G template, although
the extents of bypass synthesis across each lesions differed from
one another. With each of those four lesions, the Δ1–25
variant yielded considerably more one-base or up to four-base extended
products than the wild-type, while the R96G variant yielded only a
trace of one-base or almost no extension at the lesions. Similar patterns
were also observed in the presence of 1 mM MgCl2 (at which
pol ι was observed to be maximally active with normal DNA substrates
tested, results not shown). These results indicate that R96G and Δ1–25
pol ι variants might have a defective and hyperactive Mg2+-dependent TLS ability, respectively.
Figure 2
Extension of 32P-labeled primers opposite G, O6-MeG, N2-EtG, 8-oxoG,
and an abasic site by human wild-type pol ι (1–445) and
variants in the presence of Mg2+. The primer (24-mer) was
annealed with each of the five different 36-mer templates containing
an unmodified G, O6-MeG, N2-EtG, 8-oxoG, or abasic site placed at the 25th position
from the 3′-end. Reactions were done in the presence of 5 mM
MgCl2 for 15 min with DNA substrate (100 nM primer/template),
all four dNTPs (50 μM each), and increasing concentrations of
pol ι (0–50 nM) as indicated. The extension products
were separated by denaturing gel electrophoresis and imaged using
a phosphorimager.
Extension of 32P-labeled primers opposite G, O6-MeG, N2-EtG, 8-oxoG,
and an abasic site by human wild-type pol ι (1–445) and
variants in the presence of Mg2+. The primer (24-mer) was
annealed with each of the five different 36-mer templates containing
an unmodified G, O6-MeG, N2-EtG, 8-oxoG, or abasic site placed at the 25th position
from the 3′-end. Reactions were done in the presence of 5 mM
MgCl2 for 15 min with DNA substrate (100 nM primer/template),
all four dNTPs (50 μM each), and increasing concentrations of
pol ι (0–50 nM) as indicated. The extension products
were separated by denaturing gel electrophoresis and imaged using
a phosphorimager.
Primer Extension across
G and DNA Lesions with All Four dNTPs
by Wild-Type and Variant Pol ι Enzymes in the Presence of MnCl2
To examine the effect of Mn2+ as a prosthetic
group (instead of Mg2+) on normal and translesion polymerase
activities by six variants, standing-start primer extension experiments
were done with the wild-type and variant pol ι proteins using
24-mer primers annealed to 36-mer templates containing G, N2-EtG, O6-MeG, 8-oxoG,
or an abasic site in the presence of all four dNTPs and 0.15 mM MnCl2 (Figure 3). Wild-type pol ι
extended most 24-mer primers across G and four lesions and yielded
25- or up to 28-mer products (10 nM enzyme concentration with 0.15
mM Mn2+, Figure 3A), more effectively
than with 5 mM Mg2+ (Figure 2A),
indicating a catalytic preference of pol ι for Mn2+ compared to Mg2+, as expected from the previous literature.[20] The primer extension results for each pol ι
protein across G and four lesions in the presence of Mn2+ were almost similar to those with Mg2+ except for the
case of the Δ1–25 variant. Opposite G and four DNA lesions,
the R96G variant generated extension products considerably lower in
extent than the wild-type in the presence of Mn2+ (Figure 3A), as similarly observed with Mg2+ (Figure 2A), although the decrease of R96G bypass extent
was less opposite template N2-EtG than
the other templates. However, the Δ1–25 variant extended
the primers across G and four lesions to a similar extent as the wild-type
pol ι in the presence of Mn2+ (Figure 3), in contrast to the increase in Mg2+-dependent
polymerase activity of this variant (Figure 2).
Figure 3
Extension of 32P-labeled primers opposite G, O6-MeG, N2-EtG, 8-oxoG,
and an abasic site by human wild-type pol ι (1–445) and
variants in the presence of Mn2+. Primer (24-mer) was annealed
with each of the five different 36-mer templates containing an unmodified
G, O6-MeG, N2-EtG, 8-oxoG, or abasic site placed at the 25th position from the
3′-end. Reactions were done in the presence of 0.15 mM MnCl2 for 15 min with DNA substrate (100 nM primer/template), all
four dNTPs (50 μM each), and increasing concentrations of pol
ι (0–10 nM) as indicated. The extension products were
separated by denaturing gel electrophoresis and imaged using a phosphorimager.
Extension of 32P-labeled primers opposite G, O6-MeG, N2-EtG, 8-oxoG,
and an abasic site by human wild-type pol ι (1–445) and
variants in the presence of Mn2+. Primer (24-mer) was annealed
with each of the five different 36-mer templates containing an unmodified
G, O6-MeG, N2-EtG, 8-oxoG, or abasic site placed at the 25th position from the
3′-end. Reactions were done in the presence of 0.15 mM MnCl2 for 15 min with DNA substrate (100 nM primer/template), all
four dNTPs (50 μM each), and increasing concentrations of pol
ι (0–10 nM) as indicated. The extension products were
separated by denaturing gel electrophoresis and imaged using a phosphorimager.
Steady-State Kinetics of
Nucleotide Incorporation Opposite DNA
Lesions by the Wild-Type and Variant Pol ι Enzymes in the Presence
of MgCl2
To analyze the efficiency and fidelity
of six pol ι variants for Mg2+-dependent nucleotide
insertion opposite G and four DNA lesions, we determined steady-state
kinetic parameters for incorporation of single nucleotides into 24-mer/36-mer
duplexes opposite a G or each of four lesions in the presence of 5
mM MgCl2 by six variants in comparison to wild-type pol
ι (Tables 2–4). The values of kcat/Km and misinsertion frequency
(f = (kcat/Km)incorrect dNTP/(kcat/Km)correct dNTP) were employed as semiquantitative measures for the nucleotide insertion
efficiency and fidelity of a distributive pol ι, as applied
in previous work.[19] Wild-type pol ι
inserted single nucleotides opposite each template with the efficiency
order (based on the maximum kcat/Km) abasic lesion > O6-MeG > G > 8-oxoG > N2-EtG. Wild-type
pol ι inserted the correct dCTP in slight preference to dTTP
opposite G and N2-EtG but misinserted
dTTP and dGTP (in preference to dCTP) opposite O6-MeG and 8-oxoG, respectively, while inserting nucleoside
triphosphates opposite an abasic site in the preferential order of
dGTP > dTTP > dATP > dCTP. The ΔD17, I261M, E276K,
and Y374N
variants inserted dCTP in preference to dTTP opposite undamaged G,
with the values of kcat/Km similar to those of wild-type pol ι. However,
the R96G variant showed ∼40-fold reductions in kcat/Km values for dCTP and
dTTP insertion opposite G compared to wild-type pol ι, while
the Δ1–25 variant showed 6- to 7-fold increases in those
values. Similar trends of results were observed with four DNA lesion
templates, with some alterations in nucleotide preference for some
cases. The R96G variant displayed about 8-, 33-, 50-, and 72-fold
reductions in kcat/Km values for dCTP insertion, respectively, opposite N2-EtG, 8-oxoG, O6-MeG, and an abasic site compared to wild-type pol ι, with
5- and 10-fold increases in misinsertion frequencies for A and T opposite
8-oxoG but a 3-fold decrease in misinsertion frequency for T opposite O6-MeG. However, the Δ1–25 variant
displayed 6- to 14-fold increases in kcat/Km for correct dCTP insertion opposite
four lesions compared to wild-type pol ι, with misinsertion
frequencies similar to the wild-type protein. Interestingly, both
the Δ1–25 and R96G variants slightly preferred dTTP over
dGTP for insertion opposite an abasic site, as opposed to the case
of the wild-type pol ι, which prefers to insert dGTP (Table 4).
Table 2
Steady-State Kinetic
Parameters for
dNTP Incorporation Opposite G, O6-MeG,
and N2-EtG by Wild-Type and Variant hPols
ι(1-445) in the Presence of 5 mM Mg2+
template
pol ι(1–445)
dNTP
Km (μM)
kcat (s–1)
kcat/Km (s–1 mM–1)
finsa
relative efficiencyb
G
wild-type
C
1100 ± 300
0.021 ± 0.002
0.019
1
1
T
1800 ± 400
0.0093 ± 0.0007
0.0052
0.27
Δ1–25
C
370 ± 47
0.042 ± 0.002
0.11
1
5.8
T
1000 ± 100
0.037 ± 0.002
0.037
0.34
ΔD17
C
1900 ± 300
0.046 ± 0.002
0.024
1
1.3
T
2900 ± 1000
0.013 ± 0.002
0.0045
0.19
R96G
C
3100 ± 800
0.0015 ± 0.0001
0.00048
1
0.025
T
820 ± 230c
0.00015 ± 0.00001
0.00018
0.38
I261M
C
1500 ± 100
0.034 ± 0.0008
0.023
1
1.2
T
2400 ± 600
0.0078 ± 0.0007
0.0033
0.14
E276K
C
1700 ± 200
0.03 ± 0.001
0.018
1
0.95
T
4700 ± 1600
0.014 ± 0.002
0.0030
0.17
Y374N
C
1900 ± 200
0.022 ± 0.001
0.012
1
0.63
T
3400 ± 900
0.0079 ± 0.0008
0.0023
0.19
O6-MeG
wild-type
C
1800 ± 500
0.033 ± 0.004
0.018
1
1
T
940 ± 170
0.027 ± 0.002
0.029
1.6
Δ1–25
C
620 ± 180
0.10 ± 0.01
0.16
1
8.9
T
170 ± 50
0.043 ± 0.003
0.25
1.6
ΔD17
C
2800 ± 600
0.055 ± 0.005
0.020
1
1.1
T
1400 ± 300
0.088 ± 0.006
0.063
3.2
R96G
C
3000 ± 800
0.0011 ± 0.0001
0.00036
1
0.02
T
3200 ± 600
0.0010 ± 0.0001
0.00032
0.89
I261M
C
2200 ± 800
0.034 ± 0.004
0.018
1
1.0
T
1100 ± 200
0.039 ± 0.002
0.035
1.9
E276K
C
1800 ± 400
0.029 ± 0.002
0.016
1
0.89
T
1600 ± 300
0.042 ± 0.003
0.026
1.6
Y374N
C
2200 ± 500
0.048 ± 0.005
0.022
1
1.2
T
1500 ± 400
0.043 ± 0.004
0.029
1.3
N2-EtG
wild-type
C
2800 ± 400
0.018 ± 0.001
0.0064
1
1
T
2700 ± 200
0.012 ± 0.0003
0.0044
0.69
Δ1–25
C
550 ± 60
0.048 ± 0.001
0.087
1
14
T
770 ± 110
0.033 ± 0.001
0.043
0.49
ΔD17
C
3000 ± 300
0.028 ± 0.0001
0.0093
1
1.5
T
2800 ± 200
0.020 ± 0.001
0.0071
0.76
R96G
C
5400 ± 1600
0.0040 ± 0.0005
0.00074
1
0.12
T
1600 ± 100
0.00049 ± 0.00009
0.00031
0.41
I261M
C
2000 ± 300
0.015 ± 0.001
0.0075
1
1.2
T
1900 ± 700
0.012 ± 0.002
0.0063
0.84
E276K
C
3700 ± 500
0.026 ± 0.002
0.0070
1
1.1
T
3700 ± 400
0.021 ± 0.001
0.0057
0.81
Y374N
C
1400 ± 200
0.017 ± 0.001
0.012
1
1.9
T
2100 ± 700
0.013 ± 0.002
0.0062
0.52
Misinsertion frequency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km for dNTP incorporation by the kcat/Km for dCTP incorporation opposite template
base. All values are presented to two significant digits.
Relative efficiency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite template base by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for
dCTP incorporation opposite template base.
The apparent Km value,
determined under the condition where the amount of
enzyme is greater than the amount of DNA and thus is not strictly
steady-state.
Table 4
Steady-State Kinetic Parameters for
dNTP Incorporation Opposite Abasic Site by Wild-Type and Variant hPols
ι(1-445) in the Presence of 5 mM Mg2+
pol ι(1–445)
dNTP
Km (μM)
kcat (s–1)
kcat/Km (s–1 mM–1)
dNTP selectivity ratioa
relative efficiencyb
wild-type
A
1100 ± 30
0.081 ± 0.007
0.074
0.46
T
600 ± 90
0.058 ± 0.002
0.097
0.61
G
770 ± 110
0.12 ± 0.01
0.16
1
1
C
830 ± 550
0.027 ± 0.005
0.033
0.21
Δ1–25
A
160 ± 10
0.15 ± 0.002
0.94
0.72
T
140 ± 20
0.18 ± 0.01
1.3
1
G
230 ± 50
0.21 ± 0.01
0.91
0.70
5.7
C
680 ± 100
0.14 ± 0.01
0.21
0.16
ΔD17
A
770 ± 200
0.081 ± 0.006
0.11
0.61
T
760 ± 50
0.10 ± 0.002
0.13
0.72
G
910 ± 90
0.17 ± 0.01
0.18
1
1.1
C
2100 ± 800
0.074 ± 0.010
0.035
0.19
R96G
A
1700 ± 500
0.0035 ± 0.0003
0.0021
0.26
T
820 ± 64
0.0066 ± 0.0002
0.0080
1
G
1600 ± 400
0.0048 ± 0.0008
0.0030
0.38
0.019
C
1800 ± 400
0.0012 ± 0.0001
0.00067
0.084
I261M
A
690 ± 60
0.053 ± 0.002
0.077
0.64
T
480 ± 90
0.051 ± 0.003
0.11
0.92
G
670 ± 80
0.080 ± 0.003
0.12
1
0.75
C
860 ± 250
0.031 ± 0.002
0.036
0.30
E276K
A
1400 ± 100
0.086 ± 0.004
0.064
0.49
T
1000 ± 100
0.079 ± 0.002
0.079
0.61
G
950 ± 110
0.13 ± 0.01
0.13
1
0.81
C
2000 ± 300
0.054 ± 0.002
0.027
0.21
Y374N
A
850 ± 210
0.047 ± 0.004
0.056
0.58
T
600 ± 90
0.056 ± 0.003
0.093
0.97
G
1000 ± 200
0.096 ± 0.007
0.096
1
0.60
C
1200 ± 100
0.032 ± 0.003
0.027
0.28
dNTP selectivity ratio, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each dNTP incorporation by the highest kcat/Km for dNTP incorporation
opposite the abasic site. All values are presented to two significant
digits.
Relative efficiency,
calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dGTP incorporation
opposite the abasic site by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for
dGTP incorporation opposite the abasic site.
Misinsertion frequency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km for dNTP incorporation by the kcat/Km for dCTP incorporation opposite template
base. All values are presented to two significant digits.Relative efficiency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite template base by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for
dCTP incorporation opposite template base.The apparent Km value,
determined under the condition where the amount of
enzyme is greater than the amount of DNA and thus is not strictly
steady-state.Misinsertion frequency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km for dNTP incorporation by the kcat/Km for dCTP incorporation opposite 8-oxoG.
All values are presented to two significant digits.Relative efficiency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite 8-oxoG by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite 8-oxoG.The apparent Km value, determined under the condition where
the amount of
enzyme is greater than the amount of DNA and thus is not strictly
steady-state.dNTP selectivity ratio, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each dNTP incorporation by the highest kcat/Km for dNTP incorporation
opposite the abasic site. All values are presented to two significant
digits.Relative efficiency,
calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dGTP incorporation
opposite the abasic site by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for
dGTP incorporation opposite the abasic site.
Steady-State Kinetics of Nucleotide Incorporation Opposite DNA
Lesions by the Wild-Type and Variant Pol ι Enzymes in the Presence
of MnCl2
To evaluate the efficiency and fidelity
in Mn2+-dependent nucleotide insertion opposite G and DNA
lesions by six pol ι variants, we determined steady-state kinetic
parameters for nucleotide incorporation opposite a G or each of four
lesions in the presence of 0.15 mM MnCl2 by six variants
in comparison to the wild-type (Tables 5–7). The kcat/Km values of wild-type pol
ι for Mn2+-dependent dCTP and dTTP insertion opposite
G were 3 orders of magnitude higher than those of the wild-type protein
for Mg2+-dependent insertion. For Mn2+-dependent
nucleotide insertion, most of the variants (including the Δ1–25
variant) showed the kcat/Km values similar to those of wild-type, whereas the R96G
variant displayed 29- to 41-fold reduction in kcat/Km compared to wild-type (Table 5). Similar trends of results were observed with
four DNA lesion templates, except for the case with the template N2-EtG and the R96G variant. The R96G variant
showed about 16-, 8-, and 5-fold decreases in kcat/Km values for dCTP insertion,
respectively, opposite O6-MeG, 8-oxoG,
and the abasic site compared to those of the wild-type protein, while
showing a 9-fold increase in activity opposite N2-EtG compared to wild-type, indicating that the R96G variation
might substantially impair Mn2+-dependent TLS opposite O6-MeG, 8-oxoG, and an abasic site but facilitate
that only opposite N2-EtG. These steady-state
kinetic data might in large part explain the relatively proficient
Mn2+-dependent bypass of the R96G variant opposite N2-EtG compared to the other lesions (Figure 3).
Table 5
Steady-State Kinetic
Parameters for
dNTP Incorporation Opposite G, O6-MeG,
and N2-EtG by Wild-Type and Variant hPols
ι(1-445) in the Presence of 0.15 mM Mn2+
template
pol ι(1–445)
dNTP
Km (μM)
kcat (s–1)
kcat/Km (s–1 mM–1)
finsa
relative efficiencyb
G
wild-type
C
1.5 ± 0.1
0.11 ± 0.002
73
1
1
T
3.3 ± 0.2
0.094 ± 0.002
28
0.38
Δ1–25
C
0.52 ± 0.05
0.036 ± 0.0007
72
1
0.99
T
1.2 ± 0.1
0.055 ± 0.001
46
0.64
ΔD17
C
1.4 ± 0.003
0.12 ± 0.003
86
1
1.2
T
3.6 ± 0.2
0.12 ± 0.002
33
0.38
R96G
C
11 ± 1
0.028 ± 0.001
2.5
1
0.034
T
11 ± 1
0.0075 ± 0.0003
0.68
0.27
I261M
C
1.3 ± 0.08
0.068 ± 0.0009
52
1
0.71
T
3.0 ± 0.2
0.068 ± 0.001
23
0.44
E276K
C
1.4 ± 0.08
0.051 ± 0.0006
36
1
0.49
T
3.4 ± 0.1
0.047 ± 0.0005
14
0.39
Y374N
C
2.6 ± 0.2
0.14 ± 0.003
54
1
0.74
T
3.8 ± 0.2
0.095 ± 0.001
25
0.46
O6-MeG
wild-type
C
3.9 ± 0.1
0.10 ± 0.001
26
1
1
T
3.2 ± 0.2
0.069 ± 0.001
22
0.85
Δ1–25
C
1.6 ± 0.09
0.039 ± 0.0005
24
1
0.93
T
1.4 ± 0.2
0.027 ± 0.001
19
0.79
ΔD17
C
3.8 ± 0.2
0.18 ± 0.003
47
1
1.8
T
2.5 ± 0.4
0.087 ± 0.003
35
0.74
R96G
C
12 ± 3
0.019 ± 0.002
1.6
1
0.062
T
4.3 ± 0.6
0.0073 ± 0.0003
1.7
1.1
I261M
C
2.3 ± 0.1
0.075 ± 0.001
33
1
1.3
T
4.0 ± 0.5
0.036 ± 0.001
9.0
0.27
E276K
C
2.5 ± 0.1
0.044 ± 0.0006
18
1
0.69
T
3.2 ± 0.4
0.038 ± 0.001
12
0.67
Y374N
C
3.7 ± 0.3
0.077 ± 0.001
21
1
0.81
T
2.0 ± 0.3
0.050 ± 0.002
25
1.2
N2-EtG
wild-type
C
27 ± 2
0.034 ± 0.001
1.3
1
1
T
80 ± 5
0.045 ± 0.001
0.56
0.44
Δ1–25
C
7.5 ± 1.1
0.011 ± 0.001
1.5
1
1.2
T
29 ± 2
0.018 ± 0.0005
0.62
0.42
ΔD17
C
13 ± 1
0.025 ± 0.001
1.9
1
1.5
T
93 ± 12
0.044 ± 0.003
0.47
0.24
R96G
C
3.7 ± 0.1
0.045 ± 0.0004
12
1
9.2
T
26 ± 9
0.0058 ± 0.0008
0.22
0.018
I261M
C
16 ± 2
0.023 ± 0.001
1.4
1
1.1
T
87 ± 11
0.042 ± 0.002
0.48
0.34
E276K
C
20 ± 5
0.018 ± 0.002
0.90
1
0.69
T
92 ± 13
0.042 ± 0.003
0.46
0.51
Y374N
C
33 ± 3
0.039 ± 0.02
1.2
1
0.92
T
82 ± 4
0.035 ± 0.001
0.43
0.36
Misinsertion frequency,
calculated
by dividing kcat/Km for each dNTP incorporation by the kcat/Km for dCTP incorporation opposite
template base. All values are presented to two significant digits.
Relative efficiency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite template base by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for
dCTP incorporation opposite template base.
Table 7
Steady-State Kinetic Parameters for
dNTP Incorporation Opposite Abasic Site by Wild-Type and Variant hPols
ι(1-445) in the Presence of 0.15 mM Mn2+
pol ι(1–445)
dNTP
Km (μM)
kcat (s–1)
kcat/Km (s–1 mM–1)
dNTP selectivity ratioa
relative efficiencyb
wild-type
A
0.68 ± 0.04
0.012 ± 0.0001
18
0.18
T
1.5 ± 0.1
0.064 ± 0.001
43
0.43
G
0.29 ± 0.06
0.029 ± 0.001
100
1
1
C
2.8 ± 0.1
0.066 ± 0.001
24
0.24
Δ1–25
A
0.50 ± 0.06
0.010 ± 0.003
20
0.22
T
1.1 ± 0.1
0.024 ± 0.001
22
0.24
G
0.099 ± 0.005
0.0091 ± 0.0001
92
1
0.92
C
0.98 ± 0.08
0.043 ± 0.001
44
0.48
ΔD17
A
0.83 ± 0.13
0.016 ± 0.001
19
0.31
T
1.8 ± 0.2
0.048 ± 0.001
27
0.44
G
0.34 ± 0.04
0.021 ± 0.0004
62
1
0.62
C
1.8 ± 0.3
0.11 ± 0.004
61
0.98
R96G
A
1.9 ± 0.3
0.011 ± 0.0004
5.8
0.76
T
1.9 ± 0.2
0.0088 ± 0.0002
4.6
0.61
G
0.49 ± 0.06
0.0037 ± 0.0001
7.6
1
0.076
C
3.4 ± 0.3
0.015 ± 0.0004
4.4
0.58
I261M
A
0.35 ± 0.05
0.021 ± 0.001
60
0.50
T
1.3 ± 0.09
0.026 ± 0.0004
20
0.17
G
0.27 ± 0.02
0.032 ± 0.001
120
1
1.2
C
2.5 ± 0.4
0.050 ± 0.002
20
0.17
E276K
A
0.72 ± 0.11
0.017 ± 0.001
24
0.39
T
2.7 ± 0.3
0.028 ± 0.0007
10
0.16
G
0.34 ± 0.02
0.021 ± 0.0002
62
1
0.62
C
2.2 ± 0.1
0.041 ± 0.0005
19
0.31
Y374N
A
0.71 ± 0.09
0.026 ± 0.001
37
0.38
T
2.0 ± 0.2
0.082 ± 0.002
41
0.42
G
0.39 ± 0.03
0.038 ± 0.001
97
1
0.97
C
3.3 ± 0.3
0.047 ± 0.001
14
0.14
dNTP selectivity ratio, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km for each dNTP incorporation by the highest kcat/Km for dNTP incorporation
opposite the abasic site. All values are presented to two significant
digits.
Relative efficiency,
calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dGTP incorporation
opposite the abasic site by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for
dGTP incorporation opposite the abasic site.
Misinsertion frequency,
calculated
by dividing kcat/Km for each dNTP incorporation by the kcat/Km for dCTP incorporation opposite
template base. All values are presented to two significant digits.Relative efficiency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite template base by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for
dCTP incorporation opposite template base.Misinsertion frequency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km for each dNTP incorporation by the kcat/Km for dCTP incorporation opposite
8-oxoG. All values are presented to two significant digits.Relative efficiency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite 8-oxoG by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite 8-oxoG.dNTP selectivity ratio, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km for each dNTP incorporation by the highest kcat/Km for dNTP incorporation
opposite the abasic site. All values are presented to two significant
digits.Relative efficiency,
calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dGTP incorporation
opposite the abasic site by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for
dGTP incorporation opposite the abasic site.
Binding of the Wild-Type Pol ι(1–445) and the Variants
Δ1–25 and R96G to DNA Substrate
To analyze the
binding affinities of two dysfunctional pol ι variants, Δ1–25
and R96G, for the primer-template DNA substrate in the presence of
either Mg2+ or Mn2+, we performed fluorescence
polarization experiments. The equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd,DNA) of wild-type pol ι and the Δ1–25
and R96G variants were estimated by fitting the fluorescence polarization
values of fluorescein-labeled DNA substrates (18-FAM-mer primers annealed
to unmodified 36-G-mer templates) as a function of the pol ι
concentration to a quadratic equation (Table 8). Wild-type pol ι bound weakly to DNA with a Kd,DNA of 490 and 840 nM, respectively, at 0.15 and 1 mM
Mg2+concentrations, while binding relatively tightly to
DNA with a Kd,DNA of 68 nM at 0.15 mM
Mn2+ (but not at 1 mM Mn2+). The R96G variant
had Kd,DNA values 2- to 3-fold higher
than wild-type in the presence of either metal, indicating a slight
decrease in DNA binding affinity of pol ι by this variant. In
contrast, the Δ1–25 variant bound DNA much more tightly
(20- to 29-fold) than the wild-type protein in the presence of 0.15
or 1 mM Mg2+. Similarly, the Δ1–25 variant
also had a DNA-binding affinity (Kd,DNA = 140 nM) ∼10-fold lower than that of wild-type in the presence
of 5 mM Mg2+ (results not shown). This large difference
in the DNA-binding affinities was reduced to only 4-fold in the presence
of 0.15 mM of Mn2+. These data indicate that the N-terminal
region (residues 1–25), rich in negatively charged amino acids,
might severely interfere with DNA substrate binding of wild-type pol
ι, but this interference could be totally ablated by the deletion
of N-terminal 25 amino acids or could be substantially
overcome by the low level of Mn2+. These features might
at least in part explain the substantial increase in polymerase activity
of the Δ1–25 variant versus the wild-type pol ι
seen in the presence of Mg2+ (Figure 2, Tables 2–4) but not with Mn2+ (Figure 3,
Tables 5–7).
Here we also note that the Kd,DNA value
(68 nM) of wild-type pol ι with Mn2+ would yield
a relatively high dissociation rate, koff (∼0.68 s–1), which might make pol ι
very distributive.
Table 8
Kd Values
of Wild-Type hPol ι (1-445), and the Δ1–25 and
R96G Variants for 18-FAM-mer/36-G-mer DNA Substrate in the Presence
of MnCl2 or MgCl2
Kd (nM) of pol ι(1–445)
MnCl2 or MgCl2
wild-type
Δ1–25
R96G
0.15 mM MnCl2
68 ± 11
17 ± 3
220 ± 50
0.15 mM MgCl2
490 ± 70
17 ± 3
900 ± 200
1 mM MnCl2
840 ± 250
88 ± 16
1800 ± 400
1 mM MgCl2
840 ± 320
41 ± 7
1800 ± 600
Discussion
In
this study we examined the biochemical properties of six nonsynonymous
coding variants of human pol ι in comparison with the wild-type,
based on the newly annotated ORF sequence information. Four missense
and two deletion variations were selected for this study because they
were expected to cause functional alterations on pol ι on the
basis of the nature of the changes, positions in the pol ι catalytic
core, and predicted effects. Our biochemical data revealed that the
R96G variation severely impairs the efficiency of pol ι for
both normal and translesion syntheses at G, N2-EtG, 8-oxoG, O6-MeG, and an abasic
site regardless of the presence of Mn2+ or Mg2+ (except for the case of a Mn2+-facilitated C insertion
opposite N2-EtG), whereas the Δ1–25
deletion variation, which is equivalent to the previously misannotated
wild-type, considerably increases pol ι efficiency for both
normal and translesion syntheses in the presence of Mg2+ (but not with Mn2+). The Δ1–25 variation
greatly (20- to 29-fold) increased the DNA-binding affinity of pol
ι in the presence of Mg2+, which was much less prominent
(only about ∼4-fold) in the presence of a low concentration
of Mn2+. We also note that the poor DNA-binding affinity
of the wild-type pol ι was considerably improved by the addition
of a low level of Mn2+ when compared to that of Mg2+. In this study we report that two rare, nonsynonymous POLI genetic variations can affect the TLS activities of
human pol ι in opposite directions in vitro and that wild-type pol ι is substantially more sluggish in
activity than expected from analysis of the previous wild-type protein
(Δ1–25) in the presence of Mg2+, unlike in
the presence of Mn2+.To the best of our knowledge,
this is the first study analyzing
biochemical alterations in germline genetic variants and the newly
denoted wild-type version of human pol ι, using in vitro polymerase activity, enzyme kinetics, and binding assays. Two of
the six POLI genetic variations studied here were
found to significantly affect the in vitro enzymatic
function of pol ι in translesion DNA synthesis and DNA substrate
binding. These functional genetic variations of pol ι appear
to be rare, similar to dysfunctional pol κ variants we reported
recently,[35] in that minor allele frequencies
(MAFs) of the Δ1–25 and R96G pol ι variations are
∼0.1% and 0.6%, respectively, in public databases (Table 1). The biological significance of rare frequency
genetic variations should not be overlooked in that recent reports
suggest the possible relevance of rare genetic variations to complex
human diseases. Rare genetic variations have been proposed as a potential
source of missing disease heritability that has not been fully explained
by common genetic variations,[39] and the
recent experimental reports support this view by providing evidence
that rare genetic variations are abundantly present in human populations
and are more likely to be misfunctional than common variations.[40,41] Only 19 nonsynonymous germline variations were described in 2008
(including two reported cancer-related SNPs[28,29]), but now a total of 91 nonsynonymous germline variations have been
listed in dbSNP, most of which seem to be rare in that MAFs of 89
variations are either <1% or unavailable yet. About 46 types of
missense and nonsense somatic POLI gene mutations
have also been described from various humancancer tissues such as
endometrium, large intestine, and lung in the COSMIC database (www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP/cosmic/), but their functional
effects have not been revealed yet. Although we focused on only six
selected “putatively functional” coding variants, our
biochemical investigation can be a useful initial step to find pol
ι variations that have functional impacts and understanding
their mechanistic implications. Eleven additional nonsynonymous coding POLI variations, located in polymerase core domains and
also putatively deleterious, have been added in dbSNP since our study
began, and those functional candidates are also under our investigation.The six germline pol ι variants characterized in this study
can be classified into three types according to the changes of relative
polymerase efficiencies opposite G and the lesions in the presence
of the added metal (Mg2+ or Mn2+) compared to
wild-type (Tables 2–7). The first type is the defective variant (R96G), which is
severely impaired in both Mg2+- and Mn2+-dependent
polymerase efficiencies for both normal synthesis and lesion bypass.
Surprisingly, this particular variant exhibited a substantial improvement
in the Mn2+-dependent N2-EtG
bypass, i.e., large increases (9-fold and 24-fold, respectively) in
both efficiency and fidelity for Mn2+-dependent dCTP insertion
opposite N2-EtG compared to wild-type
enzyme (Table 5), from which we may speculate
the likelihood of a beneficial effect of this variation to efficiently
and faithfully bypass such a lesion at the expense of general diminution
in polymerase function. The second type is the hyperactive variant
(Δ1–25). This N-terminal truncation variant displayed
considerable enhancement only in Mg2+-dependent polymerase
efficiency but without any alteration in Mn2+-dependent
efficiency. The last type is the “wild-type-like” variants
(Δ17, I261M, E276K, and Y374N), which retain both normal and
TLS polymerase efficiencies similar to those of wild-type in the presence
of either Mg2+ or Mn2+. The fidelity of nucleotide
insertion opposite G and the lesions does not appear to be altered
in most variants except for the R96G variant when compared to wild-type
(Tables 2–7).
The R96G variant had a reduced fidelity in Mg2+-dependent
8-oxoG bypass due to a greater reduction of insertion efficiency for
correct dCTP than for the other nucleotides, as well as an improved
fidelity in Mn2+-dependent N2-EtG bypass (vide supra). Although all four studied
missense variations (R96G, I261M, E276K, and Y374N) were predicted
to be damaging by SIFT and/or PolyPhen, only the former variant was
found to be deleterious, but the latter three variants were found
to have nearly neutral effects on pol ι function in our study,
indicating the substantial false-positive nature of in silico prediction. False-positive errors of 20 and 9% have been reported
with SIFT and Polyphen, respectively.[42] Taken together, our results suggest the necessity and importance
of biochemical approaches to verify the functional alterations in
genetic variants, although in silico predictions
may still be useful for screening putatively damaging genetic variations
for functional studies.Three-dimensional structures of the
catalytic core of pol ι
have been determined in complex with various DNA substrates with/without
incoming nucleotides, which would be useful for the mechanistic understanding
of genetic variants (Figure 1).[14,37,38,43−45] The catalytic core of pol ι contains the palm,
fingers, thumb, and polymerase-associated domain (PAD) domains, forming
the unique narrow active site that is not conducive to Watson–Crick
base pairing.[14,44] The mechanistic basis for our
finding that the R96G variation caused a severe reduction in pol ι
catalytic activity can be explained by a structural role of Arg96
in the active site as previously revealed.[14,44] Thr90, Tyr93, and Arg96 from the fingers domain and Lys239 from
the palm domain (the latter three of which are conserved in all Y-family
DNA polymerases) function to stabilize the incoming nucleotide by
making hydrogen bonds with the triphosphate moiety in the pol ι-DNA-dNTP
ternary complex. In particular, Arg96 of pol ι undergoes a substantial
conformational change (facing inward) upon nucleotide binding to form
hydrogen bonds with the β- and γ-phosphates of the incoming
nucleoside triphosphate. Our finding of defective function in the
R96G variant is in good agreement with the previous report that Ala
substitution of the homologous Arg67 residue in yeast pol η
also considerably diminishes its polymerase activity, suggesting that
this conserved Arg residue is commonly crucial for catalytic function
in Y-family polymerases.[46] However, it
is not clear how the R96G variant unexpectedly displays an increased
competence in an error-free Mn2+-dependent N2-EtG bypass. Pol ι normally accommodates the N2-EtG in the syn conformation paired with incoming
dCTP in the active site.[43] The R96G variation
abolishes the long and positively charged side chain on Arg96 and
thus might lead to an altered conformation that hinders nucleoside
triphosphate binding and catalysis for most of the templates but is
perhaps well suited only for Mn2+-assisted pairing between
a template N2-EtG (syn) and an incoming
dCTP (anti) in the active site pocket.We established, for the
first time, that the Δ1–25
variant (i.e., the former wild-type protein) has a considerably higher
Mg2+-dependent polymerase activity (but with no alteration
in Mn2+-dependent polymerase activity) and a much higher
DNA binding affinity than wild-type pol ι. This unexpected biochemical
trait is certainly due to the absence of the N-terminal extension
of 25 amino acids (containing 12 acidic residues). As far as we know,
all reported pol ι structures have been resolved only from the
catalytic core fragment (amino acids 26–445) lacking the N-terminal
25 amino acids, and thus, the structural role of the N-terminal extension
is not known yet. However, it is evident from our observations that
this negatively charged N-terminal extension can interfere with both
DNA substrate binding and Mg2+-dependent polymerase activity
of pol ι, but these hindrances can be largely weakened by a
low level of Mn2+. Only Mn2+ (at low concentration,
150 μM) but not Mg2+ seems to considerably overcome
the inherently poor DNA binding trait of the wild-type pol ι,
possibly by masking or neutralizing the negative charged N-terminal
region of this enzyme and thus reducing the potential electrostatic
repulsion from the negatively charged phosphosugar backbone of DNA
substrates. Pol ι is also known to have a greater preference
for Mn2+ over Mg2+ as a divalent metal for polymerase
catalysis and shows maximal polymerase activity at a low concentration
of Mn2+ (with the optimum around 50–250 μM).[20] Taken together, we can postulate that the wild-type
pol ι may require a low level of Mn2+ rather than
Mg2+ as a metal for performing proper polymerase function
for two reasons: (i) mediating efficient catalysis and (ii) facilitating
tight DNA substrate binding, although the structural basis for such
a scenario has not been revealed yet. These biochemical traits of
wild-type pol ι are likely to be advantageous in that cells
might be able to control the error-prone polymerase function of pol
ι by varying the local concentration of metal near DNA damage
sites in cell nucleus, which might permit the proficient TLS events
by pol ι only in the presence of a low level of Mn2+. Although the intracellular level of Mn2+ is physiologically
very low (0.1 to 40 μM),[47−49] that of Mn2+ could
be increased in some pathological cell conditions (e.g., Mn2+ overexposure or misregulated Mn2+ homeostasis),[50,51] which might stimulate the activity of error-prone pol ι, as
well as other Mn2+-dependent DNA-processing enzymes in
the nucleus, and thus induce genomic instability. Mn2+ has
also been known to alter both catalytic efficiency and fidelity of
other DNA polymerases including pol β, pol λ, and pol
μ, albeit at high concentrations.[52−54] The effects might be
related to their active site features with regard to the cofactor
Mn2+, which has a slightly smaller ionic radius and a more
relaxed coordination than Mg2+, and might allow different
interactions with nucleoside triphosphate, DNA, and catalytic residues
in the polymerase active site, which could alter polymerase function.[55,56]It is very conceivable that the cellular pol ι-mediated
TLS
capacity could be substantially diminished or enhanced in individuals
having these two identified dysfunctional POLI gene
variations. If a cell possessed only the R96G pol ι variant
(i.e., homozygote), then most of pol ι-mediated TLS events (except
for the increased events of accurate N2-EtG bypass) would decrease in cells. Conversely, if the cell had
only the Δ1–25 pol ι variant, then pol ι-mediated
Mg2+-dependent TLS events would increase in cells. We might
expect that high replication errors occur with hyperactive pol ι
in normal DNA replication because pol ι is inherently error-prone
in its general nature. However, predicting how these two POLI gene variations would lead to overall TLS-associated mutation outcomes
in cells is not straightforward due to the complex TLS properties
of pol ι and the cellular existence of other competitive TLS
polymerases. Eukaryotic TLS process is carried out not by a single
TLS polymerase but by a set of specialized TLS polymerases recruited
at a site of DNA damage, although the extent of their individual participation
varies depending on the lesion type. The mutation consequence from
a particular DNA lesion in cells can be governed by the total set
of enzymatic behavior of multiple TLS polymerases, mainly Y-family
polymerases, utilized for the lesion substrate. Unlike Y-family pols
η and κ, which are generally considered to be specialized
for efficient and error-free bypasses at their cognate lesions, UV-induced
pyrimidine dimers and bulky N2-G adducts,
respectively, it is not clear what kind of DNA lesions could be the
cognate substrate lesions for pol ι. There is much kinetic and
structural evidence suggesting that some DNA lesions such as N2-EtG, O6-MeG, 8-oxoG,
and abasic sites might be among the favored substrate lesions for
pol ι, in that this enzyme can incorporate nucleotides opposite
those lesions as efficiently as (or slightly less efficiently than)
opposite an unmodified G by utilizing its unique active site and/or
Hoogsteen base pairing but with different nucleotide selectivities.[12,17,19,37,38,43,45] Pol ι seems to mediate relatively error-free
bypass with some minor-groove N2-G lesions
such as N2-EtG, while performing a relatively
error-prone bypass opposite major-groove O6-alkylG adducts such as O6-MeG.[12,17,37,43] In a support of this view, pol ι (as well as pol κ)
has been implicated in the error-free bypass of N2-carboxyMeG and N2-carboxyEtG
lesions in mouse cells.[57] Pol ι has
also been implicated to play a protective role from oxidative DNA
damage, possibly by mediating both the error-free TLS and the base
excision repair of 8-oxoG.[38,58,59] However, the fidelity of 8-oxoG bypass by pol ι seems to be
sequence context-dependent because the incorrect dGTP was incorporated
more favorably than dCTP opposite template 8-oxoG in our different
sequence context as observed here. Experimental evidence support the
dual and conflicting “Janus” roles of pol ι in
cancers: a protective role of pol ι in mouse lung and skin carcinogenesis[22,23] and a hypermutagenic role of pol ι, upregulated in various
humancancer tissues.[24−27] Under these circumstances, it can be hypothesized that individual
humans who possess the R96G or the Δ1–25 pol ι
variation might have an altered but complex risk for mutation and
cancer to various carcinogen exposures, depending on the DNA damage
status in their target tissues. In this aspect, it is necessary to
perform further studies to verify the in vivo impact
of those functional pol ι variants in both cellular and organismal
contexts. It is also worth examining other nonsynonymous coding variations
located in protein interaction domains of pol ι to bind other
proteins such as PCNA and ubiquitin, in that they might alter cellular
TLS events such as polymerase switching and coordination. It is also
plausible that noncoding functional variations in the gene regulatory
regions of pol ι might be able to alter pol ι expression
levels in cells and thus influence TLS events, although this aspect
was out of scope for this study.In conclusion, our results
suggest that two germline genetic variations
in humanPOLI gene may either hinder or promote the
TLS capability of pol ι with various DNA lesions in
vitro, possibly leading to different and distinctive mutation
phenotypes in genetically affected cells and individuals, i.e., facilitating
or protecting against mutagenesis/carcinogenesis after exposure to
genotoxic carcinogens. The verification of two dysfunctional genetic
variations for human pol ι in this study may provide insight
into our understanding of individual differences in cellular TLS capacities
to various carcinogen-derived DNA lesions. Such functional genetic
alterations in TLS DNA polymerases might be expected to play some
part in determining an individual’s genomic mutational susceptibility
to specific carcinogens and the related cancer risk in human populations,
although further in vivo or clinical investigations
are needed to elucidate these associations.
Table 3
Steady-State Kinetic Parameters for
dNTP Incorporation Opposite 8-oxoG by Wild-Type and Variant hPols
ι(1-445) in the Presence of 5 mM Mg2+
pol ι(1–445)
dNTP
Km (μM)
kcat (s–1)
kcat/Km (s–1 mM–1)
finsa
relative efficiencyb
wild-type
A
1300 ± 200
0.00081 ± 0.00005
0.00062
0.077
T
1600 ± 300
0.0027 ± 0.0002
0.0017
0.27
G
230 ± 40
0.0032 ± 0.0001
0.014
1.7
C
1600 ± 300
0.013 ± 0.001
0.0081
1
1
Δ1–25
A
530 ± 80
0.0034 ± 0.00017
0.0064
0.13
T
510 ± 70
0.0074 ± 0.0003
0.015
0.31
G
120 ± 10
0.0061 ± 0.00014
0.051
1.1
C
1200 ± 100
0.057 ± 0.002
0.048
1
5.9
ΔD17
A
1000 ± 200
0.00088 ± 0.00005
0.00088
0.14
T
2400 ± 200
0.0046 ± 0.0001
0.0019
0.30
G
530 ± 50
0.0062 ± 0.0002
0.012
1.9
C
4000 ± 900
0.025 ± 0.003
0.0063
1
0.78
R96G
A
840 ± 30c
0.000072 ± 0.000008
0.000086
0.36
T
290 ± 70
0.00018 ± 0.00001
0.00062
2.6
G
160 ± 20c
0.00010 ± 0.000003
0.00063
2.6
C
1900 ± 400
0.00045 ± 0.00004
0.00024
1
0.030
I261M
A
820 ± 110
0.00075 ± 0.00003
0.00092
0.21
T
1400 ± 300
0.0028 ± 0.0002
0.0020
0.47
G
320 ± 20
0.0044 ± 0.0001
0.014
3.3
C
2100 ± 300
0.0090 ± 0.0005
0.0043
1
0.53
E276K
A
1500 ± 100
0.0010 ± 0.00002
0.00066
0.11
T
2200 ± 200
0.0055 ± 0.0002
0.0025
0.43
G
920 ± 30
0.012 ± 0.0001
0.013
2.2
C
3800 ± 200
0.022 ± 0.001
0.0058
1
0.72
Y374N
A
1000 ± 100
0.00061 ± 0.00003
0.00061
0.086
T
1200 ± 200
0.0023 ± 0.0001
0.0019
0.27
G
260 ± 20
0.0030 ± 0.0001
0.013
1.8
C
1700 ± 800
0.012 ± 0.002
0.0071
1
0.88
Misinsertion frequency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km for dNTP incorporation by the kcat/Km for dCTP incorporation opposite 8-oxoG.
All values are presented to two significant digits.
Relative efficiency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite 8-oxoG by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite 8-oxoG.
The apparent Km value, determined under the condition where
the amount of
enzyme is greater than the amount of DNA and thus is not strictly
steady-state.
Table 6
Steady-State Kinetic Parameters for
dNTP Incorporation Opposite 8-oxoG by Wild-Type and Variant hPols
ι(1-445) in the Presence of 0.15 mM Mn2+
pol ι(1–445)
dNTP
Km (μM)
kcat (s–1)
kcat/Km (s–1 mM–1)
finsa
relative efficiencyb
wild-type
A
2.0 ± 0.3
0.015 ± 0.001
7.5
0.83
T
30 ± 2
0.046 ± 0.002
1.5
0.17
G
0.90 ± 0.07
0.014 ± 0.0002
16
1.8
C
4.2 ± 0.2
0.038 ± 0.001
9.0
1
1
Δ1–25
A
17 ± 1
0.021 ± 0.0003
1.2
0.092
T
5.2 ± 0.3
0.028 ± 0.001
5.4
0.42
G
0.21 ± 0.1
0.0082 ± 0.0004
39
3.0
C
1.8 ± 0.2
0.023 ± 0.001
13
1
1.4
ΔD17
A
2.0 ± 0.2
0.017 ± 0.0003
8.5
0.77
T
29 ± 1
0.055 ± 0.001
5.3
0.48
G
0.53 ± 0.06
0.013 ± 0.0003
25
2.3
C
3.5 ± 0.2
0.040 ± 0.0006
11
1
1.2
R96G
A
3.3 ± 0.3
0.0017 ± 0.00004
0.52
0.43
T
13 ± 1
0.0046 ± 0.0001
0.35
0.29
G
1.8 ± 0.2
0.0038 ± 0.0001
2.1
1.8
C
8.5 ± 0.5
0.010 ± 0.0002
1.2
1
0.13
I261M
A
1.4 ± 0.2
0.015 ± 0.0004
11
1.0
T
25 ± 3
0.026 ± 0.001
1.0
0.091
G
0.66 ± 0.07
0.012 ± 0.0003
18
1.6
C
3.1 ± 0.1
0.034 ± 1.0003
11
1
1.2
E276K
A
2.2 ± 0.3
0.022 ± 0.001
10
1.4
T
24 ± 4
0.044 ± 0.003
1.8
0.26
G
0.60 ± 0.04
0.016 ± 0.0002
27
3.9
C
3.2 ± 0.2
0.022 ± 0.0004
6.9
1
0.77
Y374N
A
1.4 ± 0.1
0.015 ± 0.0003
11
1.0
T
29 ± 6
0.025 ± 0.003
0.86
0.078
G
0.72 ± 0.06
0.018 ± 0.0003
25
2.3
C
3.6 ± 0.1
0.040 ± 0.0003
11
1
1.2
Misinsertion frequency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km for each dNTP incorporation by the kcat/Km for dCTP incorporation opposite
8-oxoG. All values are presented to two significant digits.
Relative efficiency, calculated
by dividing kcat/Km of each pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite 8-oxoG by kcat/Km of wild-type pol ι(1–445) for dCTP incorporation
opposite 8-oxoG.
Authors: O Domínguez; J F Ruiz; T Laín de Lera; M García-Díaz; M A González; T Kirchhoff; C Martínez-A; A Bernad; L Blanco Journal: EMBO J Date: 2000-04-03 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: David O Kennedy; Meenakshi Agrawal; Jing Shen; Mary Beth Terry; Fang Fang Zhang; Ruby T Senie; Grazyna Motykiewicz; Regina M Santella Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2005-01-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Matthew G Pence; Patrick Blans; Charles N Zink; Thomas Hollis; James C Fishbein; Fred W Perrino Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2008-11-03 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Amit Ketkar; Maroof K Zafar; Leena Maddukuri; Kinrin Yamanaka; Surajit Banerjee; Martin Egli; Jeong-Yun Choi; R Stephen Lloyd; Robert L Eoff Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Mina Yeom; In-Hyeok Kim; Jae-Kwon Kim; KyeongJin Kang; Robert L Eoff; F Peter Guengerich; Jeong-Yun Choi Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Ekaterina G Frank; Mary P McLenigan; John P McDonald; Donald Huston; Samantha Mead; Roger Woodgate Journal: DNA Repair (Amst) Date: 2017-08-19