| Literature DB >> 25161913 |
Stacey A Elmore1, Kathryn P Huyvaert2, Larissa L Bailey2, Jared Milhous2, Ray T Alisauskas3, Alvin A Gajadhar4, Emily J Jenkins1.
Abstract
The zoonotic parasite, Toxoplasma gondii, has a worldwide distribution and a cosmopolitan suite of hosts. In arctic tundra regions, the definitive felid hosts are rare to absent and, while the complete transmission routes in such regions have yet to be fully elucidated, trophic and vertical routes are likely to be important. Wild birds are common intermediate hosts of T. gondii, and in the central Canadian arctic, geese are probable vectors of the parasite from temperate latitudes to the arctic regions. Our objective was to estimate seroprevalence of T. gondii in Ross's and Lesser Snow Geese from the Karrak Lake ecosystem in Nunavut, Canada. After harvesting geese by shotgun, we collected blood on filter paper strips and tested the eluate for T. gondii antibodies by indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and direct agglutination test (DAT). We estimated seroprevalence using a multi-state occupancy model, which reduced bias by accounting for imperfect detection, and compared these estimates to a naïve estimator. Ross's Geese had a 0.39 probability of seropositivity, while for Lesser Snow Geese the probability of positive for T. gondii antibodies was 0.36. IFAT had a higher antibody detection probability than DAT, but IFAT also had a higher probability of yielding ambiguous or unclassifiable results. The results of this study indicate that Ross's Geese and Lesser Snow Geese migrating to the Karrak Lake region of Nunavut are routinely exposed to T. gondii at some point in their lives and that they are likely intermediate hosts of the parasite. Also, we were able to enhance our estimation of T. gondii seroprevalence by using an occupancy approach that accounted for both false-negative and false-positive detections and by using multiple diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard serological assay for wild geese.Entities:
Keywords: Agglutination test; DAT occupancy estimation; IFAT; Lesser Snow Goose; MAT; Ross’s Goose; Toxoplasma gondii
Year: 2014 PMID: 25161913 PMCID: PMC4142267 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.05.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Definition of three mutually exclusive true states and associated multi-state occupancy model parameters.
| True state | Definition | Probability |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Eluate contains no antibodies that may lead to a non-negative assay result | (1 − ψ1) |
| 1 | Eluate contains non-target antibodies or other materials that may lead to a non-negative assay result | ψ1 × (1 − ψ2) |
| 2 | Eluate contains target | ψ1 × ψ2 |
Candidate model set and model selection results of multi-state occupancy analysis to determine seroprevalence, detection probability and classification probability of T. gondii antibodies in wild geese from Karrak Lake, Nunavut, Canada.
| Model | No. parameters | −2 Log likelihood | AICc | Δ AICc | AICc weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ψ1(species) ψ2(species) | 9 | 1180.73 | 1199.50 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| ψ1(species) ψ2(species) | 10 | 1179.77 | 1200.71 | 1.21 | 0.34 |
| ψ1(.) ψ2(.) | 7 | 1191.83 | 1206.30 | 6.81 | 0.02 |
| ψ1(.) ψ2(.) | 8 | 1190.72 | 1207.33 | 7.83 | 0.01 |
| ψ1(sex) ψ2(.) | 9 | 1189.85 | 1208.61 | 9.11 | 0.01 |
| ψ1(sex) ψ2(.) | 10 | 1188.46 | 1209.40 | 9.90 | 0 |
| ψ1(species) ψ2(species) | 7 | 1275.35 | 1289.82 | 90.32 | 0 |
| ψ1(species) ψ2(species) | 8 | 1275.18 | 1291.79 | 92.29 | 0 |
| ψ1(.) ψ2(.) | 5 | 1285.49 | 1295.74 | 96.24 | 0 |
| ψ1(.) ψ2(.) | 6 | 1285.35 | 1297.70 | 98.20 | 0 |
| ψ1(sex) ψ2(sex) | 7 | 1284.50 | 1298.98 | 99.48 | 0 |
Fig. 1Comparison of seroprevalence estimates for Ross’s Geese and Lesser Snow Geese generated by naïve and multi-state occupancy estimators (seroprevalence = ψ1 × ψ2).
Model-averaged parameter estimates of seroprevalence, detection probability, and classification.
| Parameter | Estimate | SE | 95% LCI | 95% UCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ψ1Female SNGO × ψ2Female SNGO | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.49 |
| ψ1Male SNGO × ψ2Male SNGO | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.49 |
| ψ1Female ROGO × ψ2Female ROGO | 0.39 | 0.06 | 0.27 | 0.51 |
| ψ1Male ROGO × ψ2Male ROGO | 0.39 | 0.06 | 0.27 | 0.51 |
| ψ1Female SNGO | 0.99 | |||
| ψ1Male SNGO | 0.99 | |||
| ψ1Female ROGO | 0.55 | 0.15 | 0.28 | 0.80 |
| ψ1Male ROGO | 0.55 | 0.15 | 0.28 | 0.80 |
| ψ2Female SNGO | 0.36 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.53 |
| ψ2Male SNGO | 0.36 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.52 |
| ψ2Female ROGO | 0.71 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.92 |
| ψ2Male ROGO | 0.71 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
| ( | 0.01 | |||
| ( | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.27 |
| ( | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.28 |
| ( | 0.54 | 0.05 | 0.44 | 0.64 |
| (δDAT) | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.43 | 0.07 |
| (δIFAT) | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.47 | 0.68 |
Parameter estimated at boundary of parameter space. Standard error cannot be estimated.