Literature DB >> 25160862

Successful surgical approach for a patient with encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a case report and literature review.

Katsushi Takebayashi, Hiromichi Sonoda1, Tomoharu Shimizu, Hiroyuki Ohta, Mitsuaki Ishida, Eiji Mekata, Yoshihiro Endo, Tohru Tani, Masaji Tani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare surgical complication that can occur after intraperitoneal treatment. It is also a serious and potentially fatal complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. The present report describes a case of surgically treated EPS that probably occurred as a complication of hyperthermic intraperitonal chemotherapy (HIPEC). CASE
PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old man required sigmoidectomy for serosal invasive advanced sigmoid colon cancer. HIPEC with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C were given as adjuvant therapy. Subsequently, intestinal obstruction developed at 15 months postoperatively, and the patient was hospitalized. Abdominal computed tomography showed a dilated small intestine enveloped by a thickened membrane. We found no evidence of peritoneal recurrence, but exploratory surgery revealed EPS, probably caused by HIPEC. We peeled the capsule off of the intestine. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and sufficient nutritional intake after surgery was noted. Seven months after surgery, he is well with no recurrence.
CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment via peritonectomy and enterolysis for postoperative EPS appears safe and effective. A diagnosis of EPS should be considered when intestinal obstruction does not show improvement with conservative treatment in patients who have undergone HIPEC, provided the possibility of peritoneal cancer recurrence is excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25160862      PMCID: PMC4149037          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Surg        ISSN: 1471-2482            Impact factor:   2.102


Background

The use of cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a novel approach that offers improved survival after peritoneal surface malignancy, including colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) [1-3]. HIPEC is also an attractive option for the treatment of patients at high risk of developing PM after surgical management of advanced colorectal cancer [4,5]. We previously conducted a phase I clinical trial of the safety and efficacy of HIPEC for colorectal cancer in patients who were at high risk of developing PM after surgery [4]. However, HIPEC is associated with an increased risk of surgical complications and toxicity. Canda et al. described the morbidity and mortality rates after HIPEC [6]. Complications of such therapy may include nephrotoxicity, hemotoxicity, postoperative hemorrhage, anastomotic leakage, intestinal perforation, and wound complications. Awareness and early recognition of the surgical complications and toxicity of this approach may help reduce mortality rates. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare surgical complication that can occur after intraperitoneal treatment. It is also a serious and potentially fatal complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) [7]. Some reports have described EPS occurring after intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC), and EPS is considered as a delayed complication of IPC or HIPEC [7,8]. The present report describes a case of surgically treated EPS that probably occurred as a complication of HIPEC.

Case presentation

A 39-year-old man with serosal invasive advanced sigmoid colon cancer underwent surgery at Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital. Sigmoidectomy with regional lymph node dissection followed by reconstruction with stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis was performed. HIPEC was subsequently delivered as described previously [4]. Briefly, the laparotomy incision was closed until an 18-cm opening. An Alexis Wound Retractor (Applied Medical Resource, CA, USA) and plastic cylinder were used to make a waterbath space for HIPEC. A perfusate of 5 L saline solution (Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Tokushima, Japan) was circulated at flow rate of 500–750 mL/min by using the CP-3000 system (Tonokura, Tokyo, Japan). After the temperature of the perfusate reached 42-43°C, 10 mg of mitomycin-C, 1000 mg of 5-fluorouracil, and 200 mg of oxaliplatin was added. HIPEC was performed for 30 minutes after the addition of the anti-tumor drugs. We stirred the perfusate manually and extensively to strictly maintain the temperature of the abdominal perfusate between 42 and 43°C. Histological examination revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma without lymph node metastasis. The disease was classified as stage II, T4N0M0 according to the TNM classification. The number of dissected lymph nodes was 10 at this operation. There were no postoperative complications, and 4 days after the operation, he started oral intake. He was discharged from hospital on the 8th postoperative day. He received adjuvant chemotherapy with oral capecitabine administration for 3 months after surgery.Approximately 15 months after surgery, the patient presented to our hospital complaining of nausea, abdominal distention, and abdominal pain. His body weight had decreased from 60 kg at the time of initial surgery to 50 kg. Levels of the tumor markers, carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19–9, were within normal range. Abdominal x-ray showed increased intestinal gas and gas-fluid levels. He was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of adhesive intestinal obstruction. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed a dilated small intestine enveloped by a thickened membrane (Figure 1). After admission, we diagnosed as EPS based on these data. He was treated with decompression via long intestinal tube and with intravenous betamethasone administration. After 3 days, intestinal obstruction did not improve with such conservative treatments. Laparotomy was performed, showing most of the small intestine folded and extensively enveloped by a thickened membrane, with the appearance of a cocoon (Figure 2). No peritoneal nodule was found, and cytological examination of the peritoneal washing did not show any cancer cells. No signs of peritoneal recurrence were found. Incision of the thickened membrane surrounding the small intestine confirmed that the serosa of the small intestine was normal without any cancer invasion. The procedure was performed easily, except in the terminal ileum where there was tight adhesion and round fibrous stenosis. The round fibrous thickening of the small intestine was alleviated by incising the surrounding thickened membrane. There were no postoperative complications, including recurrence of intestinal obstruction. Seven days after the operation, he started oral intake. He was discharged from hospital on the 18th postoperative day. Histological findings of the thickened membrane showed proliferation of fibroconnective tissue and inflammatory infiltrates (Figure 3a, b). No histological signs of peritoneal recurrence were found. Seven months after surgery, he is well, with no radiological signs or laboratory evidence of recurrence, and his body weight has increased back to that observed in the preoperative state.
Figure 1

Abdominal computed tomography shows a dilated and filled small intestine enveloped by a thickened membrane ( ).

Figure 2

Operative findings showed small intestine covered by white and fibrous membrane. The small intestine is partially covered by a white membrane and looks like a cocoon. The fibrous membrane is peeled off to release the small intestine.

Figure 3

Histological features of the case. (a), (b) Histological findings of the thickened membrane show proliferation of fibroconnective tissue and inflammatory infiltrates.

Abdominal computed tomography shows a dilated and filled small intestine enveloped by a thickened membrane ( ). Operative findings showed small intestine covered by white and fibrous membrane. The small intestine is partially covered by a white membrane and looks like a cocoon. The fibrous membrane is peeled off to release the small intestine. Histological features of the case. (a), (b) Histological findings of the thickened membrane show proliferation of fibroconnective tissue and inflammatory infiltrates. This report described a rare case of EPS after HIPEC that was successfully treated via the surgical approach. EPS causes intestinal obstruction, because the small intestine is enveloped by a secondary thick fibrosis. Several report showed the morbidity rates after HIPEC were 20.8-53.3% [6]. Major complications may include nephrotoxicity, hemotoxicity, postoperative hemorrhage, anastomotic leakage, intestinal perforation, and wound complications [6]. EPS is a rare surgical complication that can occur after HIPEC. The cause is still unclear, although several factors have been implicated, including CAPD treatment for chronic renal failure and a past history of peritonitis or cirrhotic ascites [9]. Only one report describes the occurrence of EPS as a delayed complication of HIPEC [7]. Previously, 9 cases of EPS after IPC and 1 case of EPS after HIPEC were reported (Table 1) [7,8,10,11]. Most of the cases developing EPS underwent intraperitoneal chemotherapy including platinums. One of the possible causes of EPS in patients undergoing CAPD is related to the low pH of the dialysate [7]. The incidence of EPS decreases in response to agents that neutralize the pH of the dialysate [7]. In our method, the optimal pH for Oxaliplatin ranges from approximately 4.0 to 7.0 [4], and this acidity might contribute to the development of EPS.
Table 1

Reported cases of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis after intraperitoneal chemotherapy treated by the surgical approach

NoAuthorsYearAge (years)GenderDiseaseAgentHyperthermiaEPS after initial surgeryTreatment for EPSPeritoneal recurrenceRecurrence of EPSSurvival after initial surgery
1
Braly [11]
1986
Unknown
Female
Ovarian cancer
Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil
No
Unknown
Laparotomy
No
Unknown
Unknown
2
Braly [11]
1986
Unknown
Female
Ovarian cancer
Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil
No
Unknown
Laparotomy
No
Unknown
Unknown
3
Braly [11]
1986
Unknown
Female
Ovarian cancer
Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil
No
Unknown
Laparotomy
No
Unknown
Unknown
4
Vlasveld [10]
1992
44
Male
Mesothelioma
Metoxantrone
No
24 months
Surgery
No
No
Alive, 48 months
5
Atiq [8]
1993
Unknown
Unknown
Gastric cancer
Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil
No
4 to 17.5 months
Surgery
No
No
Unknown
6
Atiq [8]
1993
Unknown
Unknown
Gastric cancer
Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil
No
4 to 17.5 months
Surgery
No
No
Unknown
7
Atiq [8]
1993
Unknown
Unknown
Gastric cancer
Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil
No
4 to 17.5 months
Surgery
No
No
Unknown
8
Atiq [8]
1993
Unknown
Unknown
Gastric cancer
Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil
No
4 to 17.5 months
Surgery
No
Yes
Unknown
9
Atiq [8]
1993
Unknown
Unknown
Gastric cancer
Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil
No
4 to 17.5 months
Laparotomy
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
10
Aihara [7]
2003
47
Female
Gastric cancer
Cisplatin, mitomycin-C
Yes
6 months
Surgery
No
No
Alive, 21 months
11Our case201439MaleColon cancerOxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin-CYes16 monthsSurgery, oral steroid therapyNoNoAlive, 24 months

Abbreviation:EPS encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.

Reported cases of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis after intraperitoneal chemotherapy treated by the surgical approach Abbreviation:EPS encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. An intraperitoneal temperature of 42-43°C is necessary to obtain the maximal therapeutic effects of HIPEC [7]. Previous reports have described EPS occurred even among patients treated by normothermia [8,10]. Shindo et al. reported that peritoneal damage was not dissimilar between patients given HIPEC and those given continuous normothermic peritoneal perfusion using 37.0°C perfusate [12]. However, hyperthermia induced intracellular acidosis [13] and may accelerate instability in intracellular pH. Thus, we consider hyperthermia may be a cause of EPS. Steroid therapy is considered to be effective for preventing EPS, because the “second hit” in development of EPS may be related to various cytokines. The second hit theory whereby dialysis fluids contribute to peritoneum damage. Cases of peritoneal dialysis-related EPS have responded favorably to corticosteroid therapy alone [9]. In our case, however, steroid therapy was not effective. In our case, incision and resection of the sclerosing peritoneum resulted in improvement of stenosis without postoperative complications. It is important that the enterolysis is performed without damaging the encapsulated intestine. The overall morbidity rate of surgery for EPS is reported as approximately 60% [14]. However, Kawanishi et al. reported successful treatment of 18 patients with CAPD-related EPS and suggested that peritonectomy and enterolysis for EPS was a useful therapeutic method [15]. They emphasized the critical role of early diagnosis of EPS as well as determination of the therapeutic strategy according to the disease stage. In three patients, EPS was relieved by steroid therapy. In 15 patients, EPS was relieved by total intestinal enterolysis. These patients had satisfactory operative outcomes and returned to their previous activity. Ulmer et al. reviewed 26 patients with EPS who underwent peritonectomy and enterolysis [16]. They suggested that this treatment option could be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Thus, peritonectomy and enterolysis are considered to be appropriate methods for EPS induced by HIPEC in a manner similar to that for EPS induced by CAPD.

Conclusion

Preoperative distinction among adhesion, EPS, or PM can be difficult when small bowel obstruction occurs in patients who have received HIPEC. A diagnosis of EPS should be considered if intestinal obstruction does not show improvement with conservative treatment, provided that the possibility of PM is excluded. Early laparotomy and resection of thickening fibrosis are important to improve the patient’s quality of life. In addition, ongoing efforts to increase the feasibility and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are warranted.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Abbreviations

EPS: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis; HIPEC: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; PM: Peritoneal metastasis; CAPD: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; IPC: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy; CT: Computed tomography.

Competing interests

None of the authors have a conflict of interest or have received financial support.

Authors’ contributions

KT drafted the manuscript, and conducted a literature search. HS, TS and HO conducted a literature search and contributed to drafting the manuscript. MI evaluated histopathological examination. HS, TS, HO, EM, YE and TT performed the operation and reviewed the manuscript and gave final approval for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/14/57/prepub
  16 in total

1.  Efficacy and morbidity of surgical therapy in late-stage encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.

Authors:  Christoph Ulmer; Niko Braun; Fabian Rieber; Joerg Latus; Sandra Hirschburger; Jens Emmel; M Dominik Alscher; Wolfgang Steurer; Klaus-Peter Thon
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Technical aspects of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in abdominal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  P Braly; J Doroshow; S Hoff
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy using a combination of mitomycin C,5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin in patients at high risk of colorectal peritoneal metastasis: A Phase I clinical study.

Authors:  T Shimizu; H Sonoda; S Murata; K Takebayashi; H Ohta; T Miyake; E Mekata; H Shiomi; S Naka; T Tani
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 4.  Summary of current therapeutic options for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Terence C Chua; Jesus Esquivel; Joerg O W Pelz; David L Morris
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Treatment options for encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis based on progressive stage.

Authors:  H Kawanishi; Y Harada; T Noriyuki; T Kawai; S Takahashi; M Moriishi; S Tsuchiya
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  2001

6.  Complications and toxicities after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Aras Emre Canda; Selman Sokmen; Cem Terzi; Cigdem Arslan; Ilhan Oztop; Bulent Karabulut; Deniz Ozzeybek; Sulen Sarioglu; Mehmet Fuzun
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Aspects of metabolic change after hyperthermia.

Authors:  C Streffer
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1988

Review 8.  Peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  S Riss; F Mohamed; S Dayal; T Cecil; A Stift; T Bachleitner-Hofmann; B Moran
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Phase II trial of postoperative adjuvant intraperitoneal cisplatin and fluorouracil and systemic fluorouracil chemotherapy in patients with resected gastric cancer.

Authors:  O T Atiq; D P Kelsen; M H Shiu; L Saltz; W Tong; D Niedzwiecki; B Trochanowski; S Lin; F Toomasi; M Brennan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (SEP) as a delayed complication of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP): report of a case.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Aihara; Hidenori Maruoka; Hirokazu Kiyozaki; Fumio Konishi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.549

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Severe peritoneal sclerosis after repeated pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC OX): report of two cases and literature survey.

Authors:  M Graversen; S Detlefsen; P Pfeiffer; L Lundell; M B Mortensen
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.

Authors:  Christopher J Danford; Steven C Lin; Martin P Smith; Jacqueline L Wolf
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  In Vivo Feasibility of Electrostatic Precipitation as an Adjunct to Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC).

Authors:  Tinatin Kakchekeeva; Cedric Demtröder; Nirmitha I Herath; Dominic Griffiths; Jared Torkington; Wiebke Solaß; Marie Dutreix; Marc A Reymond
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Imaging and treatment of idiopathic abdominal cocoon in 9 patients.

Authors:  Rui Yu; Yang Ya; Xiaoqiong Ni; Guohua Fan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis as a rare cause of intestinal obstruction after the treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Zhizhan Ni; Qing Chen; Chenshen Huang; Song Wang; Qi Huang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.