PURPOSE:Calcium aluminosilicate clay (CASAD) is a naturally occurring clay that serves as a cation exchange absorbent. We hypothesized that oral administration of CASAD would reduce the rate of grade 3/4 diarrhea associated with irinotecan use for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) by adsorbing the SN-38 metabolite. METHODS: Patients receiving irinotecan-based chemotherapy were randomized equally between CASAD and placebo arms in this multicenter trial in order to assess differences in the proportions of patients with grade 3/4 diarrhea within 6 weeks. Additionally, we compared symptom severity between the two arms using the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. RESULTS:Between May 2009 and May 2012, 100 patients were enrolled. In evaluable patients, 7 of 43 (16 %) on the CASAD arm compared to 3 of 32 (9 %) on the placebo arm experienced grade 3/4 diarrhea (P = 0.70). The rate of any diarrhea among all patients was similar (CASAD arm, 64 % vs. placebo arm, 70 %). The rate of study dropout was 14 % in the CASAD arm and 38 % in the placebo arm (P = 0.01). No differences were found in symptom severity, individual symptom items, and in serious adverse events between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Compared to placebo, CASAD use was safe but ineffective in preventing diarrhea in metastatic CRC patients treated with irinotecan-containing chemotherapy regimens. There were no distinct signals in terms of patient symptoms between arms, but there was significantly more patient dropout in the placebo arm. Future CASAD trials will focus on the active treatment of diarrhea.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Calcium aluminosilicate clay (CASAD) is a naturally occurring clay that serves as a cation exchange absorbent. We hypothesized that oral administration of CASAD would reduce the rate of grade 3/4 diarrhea associated with irinotecan use for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) by adsorbing the SN-38 metabolite. METHODS:Patients receiving irinotecan-based chemotherapy were randomized equally between CASAD and placebo arms in this multicenter trial in order to assess differences in the proportions of patients with grade 3/4 diarrhea within 6 weeks. Additionally, we compared symptom severity between the two arms using the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. RESULTS: Between May 2009 and May 2012, 100 patients were enrolled. In evaluable patients, 7 of 43 (16 %) on the CASAD arm compared to 3 of 32 (9 %) on the placebo arm experienced grade 3/4 diarrhea (P = 0.70). The rate of any diarrhea among all patients was similar (CASAD arm, 64 % vs. placebo arm, 70 %). The rate of study dropout was 14 % in the CASAD arm and 38 % in the placebo arm (P = 0.01). No differences were found in symptom severity, individual symptom items, and in serious adverse events between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Compared to placebo, CASAD use was safe but ineffective in preventing diarrhea in metastatic CRCpatients treated with irinotecan-containing chemotherapy regimens. There were no distinct signals in terms of patient symptoms between arms, but there was significantly more patient dropout in the placebo arm. Future CASAD trials will focus on the active treatment of diarrhea.
Authors: J-S Wang; H Luo; M Billam; Z Wang; H Guan; L Tang; T Goldston; E Afriyie-Gyawu; C Lovett; J Griswold; B Brattin; R J Taylor; H J Huebner; T D Phillips Journal: Food Addit Contam Date: 2005-03
Authors: Rachel J Gibson; Dorothy M K Keefe; Rajesh V Lalla; Emma Bateman; Nicole Blijlevens; Margot Fijlstra; Emily E King; Andrea M Stringer; Walter J F M van der Velden; Roger Yazbeck; Sharon Elad; Joanne M Bowen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-11-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; István Láng; Gunnar Folprecht; Marek P Nowacki; Stefano Cascinu; Igor Shchepotin; Joan Maurel; David Cunningham; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Angela Zubel; Ilhan Celik; Philippe Rougier; Fortunato Ciardiello Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Al B Benson; Jaffer A Ajani; Robert B Catalano; Constance Engelking; Steven M Kornblau; James A Martenson; Richard McCallum; Edith P Mitchell; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Everett E Vokes; Scott Wadler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: George P Kim; Daniel J Sargent; Michelle R Mahoney; Kendrith M Rowland; Philip A Philip; Edith Mitchell; Abraham P Mathews; Tom R Fitch; Richard M Goldberg; Steven R Alberts; Henry C Pitot Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel J Sargent; Claus Henning Köhne; Hanna Kelly Sanoff; Brian M Bot; Matthew T Seymour; Aimery de Gramont; Ranier Porschen; Leonard B Saltz; Philippe Rougier; Christopher Tournigand; Jean-Yves Douillard; Richard J Stephens; Axel Grothey; Richard M Goldberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ramona Dadu; Mimi I Hu; Charles Cleeland; Naifa L Busaidy; Mouhammed Habra; Steven G Waguespack; Steven I Sherman; Anita Ying; Patricia Fox; Maria E Cabanillas Journal: Thyroid Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: M Schmidt-Hieber; J Bierwirth; D Buchheidt; O A Cornely; M Hentrich; G Maschmeyer; E Schalk; J J Vehreschild; Maria J G T Vehreschild Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2017-11-24 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: Femke M de Man; Andrew K L Goey; Ron H N van Schaik; Ron H J Mathijssen; Sander Bins Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 6.447