Literature DB >> 25158992

Comparison of intubation performance by emergency medicine residents using gum elastic bougie versus standard stylet in simulated easy and difficult intubation scenarios.

Ryan Walsh1, Laura Cookman, Emily Luerssen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the success rate and time to endotracheal intubation by emergency medicine residents with stylet reinforced endotracheal tube (ETT-S) versus intubation with a gum elastic bougie (GEB) in simulated easy and difficult airways on a cadaveric model.
METHODS: The study was a prospective cross-over design using a cohort of 29 emergency medicine residents. A fresh frozen cadaver was used in either standard positioning to facilitate a Cormack Lehane Grade 1 laryngoscopy, or with a hard cervical collar applied a Cormack Lehane Grade 3 laryngoscopy. Each participant then intubated the cadaver in each setting. The primary end-point of our investigation was the time to intubation. Secondary end-points were: success rate of intubation, mean ratings by study participants of perceived ease of intubation for each intubation technique in each simulated degree of difficulty, and overall preference of intubation technique in each simulated degree of difficulty.
RESULTS: Mean time to intubation in all scenarios ranged from 28.8-116.6 s. Time to intubation was significantly different only when comparing Grade 3 ETT-S to Grade 3 GEB. There was no significant difference in success rate when comparing Grade 1 ETT-S to Grade 1 GEB (P = 0.99) nor Grade 3 ETT-S to Grade 3 GEB (P = 0.21).
CONCLUSION: Time to intubation in a simulated grade 3 view was significantly longer in the GEB group versus the ETT-S group. Although the differences in success rates were not statistically significant, there was a trend toward more successful intubations with the GEB in the simulated grade 3 view. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway; bougie; simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25158992     DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med Australas        ISSN: 1742-6723            Impact factor:   2.151


  3 in total

1.  The adjuncts for endotracheal tube passage in simulated pediatric airways (AET-SPA) study.

Authors:  Khang Hee Gan; Mike Shepherd
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial.

Authors:  Togay Evrin; Jacek Smereka; Damian Gorczyca; Szymon Bialka; Jerzy Robert Ladny; Burak Katipoglu; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.112

3.  Comparing S-Guide® and Gliderite® Times to Assist Video laryngoscopic Intubation in Patients with Simulated Difficult Airways: A Single-Blinded Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Coralie Nkoulou; Thomas Maibach; Istvan Bathory; Nicolas Fournier; Patrick Schoettker
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2022-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.