| Literature DB >> 25158756 |
Marta González-Warleta, José Antonio Castro-Hermida, Javier Regidor-Cerrillo, Julio Benavides, Gema Álvarez-García, Miguel Fuertes, Luis Miguel Ortega-Mora, Mercedes Mezo.
Abstract
Neospora caninum has been detected only sporadically in cases of ovine abortion, and it has therefore traditionally been considered as an unimportant parasite in small ruminants. This study was carried out with the aim of identifying the pathogen causing serious reproductive problems on a commercial sheep farm. Sera from all rams and ewes tested negative for antibodies against Border disease virus, Schmallenberg virus and Coxiella burnetii, and infections by these agents were therefore ruled out. Nevertheless, seropositivity to N. caninum and/or Toxoplasma gondii was detected, although the seroprevalence was higher in the case of N. caninum. The percentage of lambings and the number of lambs per dam were significantly lower in ewes that were seropositive to N. caninum while no effect on these parameters was detected in ewes that were seropositive to T. gondii. There was also no evidence of infection by T. gondii in the foetal/lamb tissues analyzed by PCR and/or immunohistopathological techniques. On the contrary, the DNA of N. caninum was detected in 13 out of 14 foetuses/lambs descendant from dams seropositive to this parasite. Characteristic lesions caused by N. caninum and/or its antigen were also detected. Genotyping of the N. caninum DNA revealed only two closely related microsatellite multilocus genotypes. The results clearly demonstrate that infection by N. caninum was the cause of the low reproductive performance of this sheep flock.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25158756 PMCID: PMC4153895 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-014-0088-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Seropositivity for single and mixed infections with and in two consecutive years
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 2011 | 265 | 91 (34.3)*** | 70.5 ± 23.8 | 27 (10.2) | 64-256 | 15 (5.7) | 75.0 ± 20.5; 64-256 |
| 2012 | 245 | 43 (17.5)3 | 74.0 ± 32.2 | 21 (8.6) | 64-256 | 6 (2.4) | 44.9 ± 37.6; 64-128 |
1cut-off percentage of positivity (PP) for in-house ELISA = 7.0%; 2cut off titre for Mast Toxoreagent test® = 64; 3this number came from 38 seropositive ewes that remained after culling in 2011 + 5 ewes that seroconverted in 2012. ***Statistically significant at p < 0.001.
Impact of and ewe serostatus on the reproductive results of the farm in 2011 (A) and 2012 (B)
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Positive to | 91 | 54 (59.3%)a | 1.8 (99/54)a |
| Positive to | 27 | 24 (88.9%)b | 2.2 (53/24)ab |
| Positive to | 15 | 9 (60.0%)a | 1.8 (16/9)ab |
| Negative | 132 | 112 (84.8%)b | 2.2 (242/112)b |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Positive to | 43 | 31 (72.1%)a | 1.9 (53/31) |
| Positive to | 21 | 20 (95.2%)b | 2.1 (41/20) |
| Positive to | 6 | 4 (66.7%)ab | 1.5 (6/4) |
| Negative | 175 | 160 (91.4%)b | 2.0 (322/160) |
1Different letters within each column indicate statistical differences between serostatus groups, at p < 0.05.
Results of PCR, histology and IHC in tissues of foetuses/lambs and relationship with maternal serostatus
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | 2011 | 72.5 | < 16 | 2/2 | na | na | na | - | na | na | na |
| 2 | 2011 | 86.3 | 32 | 2/2 | - | 1/2 | - | - | na | na | na |
| 3 | 2012 | 89.9 | < 16 | 2/2 | - | - | - | - | na | na | na |
| 4$ | 2012 | 44.0 | < 16 | 3/3 | 1/3 | - | - | - | ** | + | - |
| 5 | 2011 | 65.1 | < 16 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 | - | - | na | na | na |
| 6 | 2011 | 65.1 | < 16 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 | - | - | na | na | na |
| 7# | 2011 | 79.3 | < 16 | 2/2 | na | na | na | - | na | na | na |
| 8 | 2011 | 0.0 | < 16 | - | nd | nd | nd | - | na | na | na |
| 9 | 2011 | 52.0 | < 16 | 2/2 | - | - | - | - | na | na | na |
| 10 | 2011 | 94.1 | 32 | - | nd | nd | nd | - | na | na | na |
| 11 | 2011 | 94.1 | 32 | 1/2 | - | - | - | - | na | na | na |
| 12 | 2011 | 82.1 | < 16 | 3/3 | - | - | - | - | - | + | - |
| 13 | 2011 | 0.0 | < 16 | - | nd | nd | nd | - | * | - | - |
| 14 | 2012 | 1.4 | < 16 | - | nd | nd | nd | - | Unrelated | - | - |
| 15 | 2012 | 28.1 | 16 | 3/3 | na | na | na | - | na | na | na |
| 16a | 2012 | 0.0 | 16 | - | nd | nd | nd | - | na | na | na |
| 17ª | 2012 | 0.0 | < 16 | - | nd | nd | nd | - | na | na | na |
| 18b | 2012 | 0.0 | < 16 | - | nd | nd | nd | - | * | - | - |
| 19b | 2012 | 0.0 | < 16 | - | nd | nd | nd | - | - | - | - |
| 20 | 2012 | 64.6 | < 16 | 3/3 | na | na | na | - | * | + | - |
| 21 | 2012 | 98.9 | < 16 | 3/3 | 2/3 | 3/3 | 1/3 | - | ** | + | - |
11-4: aborted foetus; 5–19: stillborn; 20–21: newborn with neurological disorders; $: In this sample, parasite was also detected in placenta, by PCR and IHC; #All organs were analyzed for the presence of bacteria and viruses causing ovine abortions, and the results were negative; a,b: lambs indicated by the same superscript letter were twins; 2Positivity Percentage (PP) as determined by ELISA (cut off ≥ 7.0%); 3Titre determined by agglutination (cut off ≥ 1:64);
4Fractions represent the number of positive tissue samples/total number of samples checked by PCR; (−): negative results; na: samples were not available or suitable for analysis; nd: not determined when the target organ (brain) was negative by PCR; 5Histological features were classified according to previous descriptions [21] as unrelated, consistent (*) or characteristic (**) lesions of protozoan infection.
Microsatellite genetic profiles for the 13 infected-brain samples from foetuses/lambs
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| MS4 | GC- | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | ND | 15 |
| MS5 | CG- | 16 | 16 | 16 | ND | 15 | 15 | 16 | 16 | ND | 15 | 15 | 15 | ND |
| MS6A | GC- | 15 | 15 | 15 | ND | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | ND | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| MS6B | CC- | 12 | 12 | 12 | ND | 12 | 12 | ND | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| MS7 | AT-TA- | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | ND | 9 | 9 | ND | 9 |
| MS8 | TGAC- | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 |
| MS10 | AGT- | 6.14.9 | 6.14.9 | 6.14.9 | ND | 6.14.9 | 6.14.9 | 6.14.9 | 6.14.9 | 6.14.9 | 6.14.9 | 6.14.9 | 6.14.9 | 6.14.9 |
| MS12 | GC- | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| MS21 | TG-(TACA)3-TACC- | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ND | 6 |
aMicrosatellite alleles are expressed as the number of repeats (X, Y and Z) in the motif sequences according to fragment size analysis and sequencing [20]. ND: Not determined.
Figure 1Histological findings in foetus/lamb brains positive to PCR. A) Focus of gliosis with central area of coagulative to caseous necrosis in the grey matter (HE; Bar = 100 μm); B) Mild perivascular infiltration of mononuclear inflammatory cells in the white matter (HE; Bar = 200 μm); C) Intracellular cyst containing high number of bradyzoites. Note the absence of inflammation (HE; Bar = 25 μm); D) Immunohistochemical labelling of several protozoan tissue cysts in the grey matter. Note the absence of evident inflammatory infiltration in relation to the cysts (IHC; Bar = 300 μm) Inset: Detail of an immunolabelled tissue cyst (IHC; Bar = 15 μm).