Pok-Ja Oh1, Soo Hyun Kim2. 1. Department of Nursing, Sahmyook University in Seoul, South Korea. 2. Department of Nursing, Inha University in Incheon, South Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of a spiritual intervention in patients with cancer. DATA SOURCES: Databases searched included both international electronic databases (MEDLINE® via PubMed, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, EMBASE, and CINAHL®) as well as Korean electronic databases (KMBASE, KOREAMED, RISS, KISS, and NANET) through December 2013. DATA SYNTHESIS: A meta-analysis was conducted of 15 studies involving 14 controlled trials (7 randomized and 7 nonrandomized) with 889 patients with cancer. Spiritual interventions were compared with a usual care control group or other psychosocial interventions. The weighted average effect size across studies was -0.48 (p = 0.006, I2 = 65%) for spiritual well-being, -0.58 (p = 0.02, I2 = 70%) for meaning of life, -0.87 (p = 0.02, I2 = 87%) for anxiety, and -0.62 (p = 0.001, I2 = 73%) for depression. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that spiritual interventions had significant but moderate effects on spiritual well-being, meaning of life, and depression. However, the evidence remains weak because of the mixed study design and substantial heterogeneity. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses increasingly recognize the significance of the spiritual domain of care. The current study indicates that facilitating spiritual awareness and needs may be a worthwhile nursing intervention for patients with cancer.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of a spiritual intervention in patients with cancer. DATA SOURCES: Databases searched included both international electronic databases (MEDLINE® via PubMed, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, EMBASE, and CINAHL®) as well as Korean electronic databases (KMBASE, KOREAMED, RISS, KISS, and NANET) through December 2013. DATA SYNTHESIS: A meta-analysis was conducted of 15 studies involving 14 controlled trials (7 randomized and 7 nonrandomized) with 889 patients with cancer. Spiritual interventions were compared with a usual care control group or other psychosocial interventions. The weighted average effect size across studies was -0.48 (p = 0.006, I2 = 65%) for spiritual well-being, -0.58 (p = 0.02, I2 = 70%) for meaning of life, -0.87 (p = 0.02, I2 = 87%) for anxiety, and -0.62 (p = 0.001, I2 = 73%) for depression. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that spiritual interventions had significant but moderate effects on spiritual well-being, meaning of life, and depression. However, the evidence remains weak because of the mixed study design and substantial heterogeneity. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses increasingly recognize the significance of the spiritual domain of care. The current study indicates that facilitating spiritual awareness and needs may be a worthwhile nursing intervention for patients with cancer.
Authors: Fabiana Cristina Dos Santos; Tamara G R Macieira; Yingwei Yao; Samantha Hunter; Olatunde O Madandola; Hwayoung Cho; Ragnhildur I Bjarnadottir; Karen Dunn Lopez; Diana J Wilkie; Gail M Keenan Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: D M Hansra; K McIntyre; J Ramdial; S Sacks; C S Patrick; J Cutler; B McIntyre; K Feister; M Miller; A K Taylor; F Farooq; J Antunez de Mayolo; E Ahn Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 2.629