Literature DB >> 25158032

The geographic and demographic scope of shared sanitation: an analysis of national survey data from low- and middle-income countries.

Marieke Heijnen1, Ghislaine Rosa, James Fuller, Joseph N S Eisenberg, Thomas Clasen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A large and growing proportion of the world's population rely on shared sanitation facilities that have historically been excluded from international targets due to concerns about acceptability, hygiene and access. In connection with a proposed change in such policy, we undertook this study to describe the prevalence and scope of households that report relying on shared sanitation and to characterise them in terms of selected socio-economic and demographic covariates.
METHODS: We extracted data from the most recent national household surveys of 84 low- and middle-income countries from Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. We describe the prevalence of shared sanitation and explore associations between specified covariates and reliance on shared sanitation using log-binomial regression.
RESULTS: While household reliance on any type of shared sanitation is relatively rare in Europe (2.5%) and the Eastern Mediterranean (7.7%), it is not uncommon in the Americas (14.2%), Western Pacific (16.4%) and South-East Asia (31.3%), and it is most prevalent in Africa (44.6%) where many shared facilities do not meet the definition of 'improved' even if they were not shared (17.7%). Overall, shared sanitation is more common in urban (28.6%) than in rural settings (25.9%), even after adjusting for wealth. While results vary geographically, people who rely on shared sanitation tend to be poorer, reside in urban areas and live in households with more young children and headed by people with no formal education. Data from 21 countries suggest that most sharing is with neighbours and other acquaintances (82.0%) rather than the public.
CONCLUSIONS: The determinants of shared sanitation identified from these data suggest potential confounders that may explain the apparent increased health risk from sharing and should be considered in any policy recommendation. Both geographic and demographic heterogeneity indicate the need for further research to support a change in policies.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Demographic and Health Surveys; assainissement; encuestas sanitarias y demográficas; saneamiento; sanitation; surveillances démographiques et de santé

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25158032     DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Med Int Health        ISSN: 1360-2276            Impact factor:   2.622


  10 in total

1.  Shared Sanitation Versus Individual Household Latrines in Urban Slums: A Cross-Sectional Study in Orissa, India.

Authors:  Marieke Heijnen; Parimita Routray; Belen Torondel; Thomas Clasen
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  The Sustainable Development Goal for Urban Sanitation: Africa's Statistical Tragedy Continues?

Authors:  Robert M Buckley; Achilles Kallergis
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  A Cross Sectional Study of the Association between Sanitation Type and Fecal Contamination of the Household Environment in Rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Tarique Md Nurul Huda; Wolf-Peter Schmidt; Amy J Pickering; Zahid Hayat Mahmud; Mohammad Sirajul Islam; Md Sajjadur Rahman; Stephen P Luby; Adam Biran
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  The impact of shared sanitation facilities on diarrheal diseases with and without an environmental reservoir: a modeling study.

Authors:  Matthew R Just; Stephen W Carden; Sheng Li; Kelly K Baker; Manoj Gambhir; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  A controlled, before-and-after trial of an urban sanitation intervention to reduce enteric infections in children: research protocol for the Maputo Sanitation (MapSan) study, Mozambique.

Authors:  Joe Brown; Oliver Cumming; Jamie Bartram; Sandy Cairncross; Jeroen Ensink; David Holcomb; Jackie Knee; Peter Kolsky; Kaida Liang; Song Liang; Rassul Nala; Guy Norman; Richard Rheingans; Jill Stewart; Olimpio Zavale; Valentina Zuin; Wolf-Peter Schmidt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Household sanitation access and risk for non-marital sexual violence among a nationally representative sample of women in India, 2015-16.

Authors:  Georgia Lyn Kayser; Praveen Chokhandre; Namratha Rao; Abhishek Singh; Lotus McDougal; Anita Raj
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-01-23

7.  Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes among Women Practicing Poor Sanitation in Rural India: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bijaya K Padhi; Kelly K Baker; Ambarish Dutta; Oliver Cumming; Matthew C Freeman; Radhanatha Satpathy; Bhabani S Das; Pinaki Panigrahi
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Sanitation facilities, hygienic conditions, and prevalence of acute diarrhea among under-five children in slums of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Baseline survey of a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Metadel Adane; Bezatu Mengistie; Helmut Kloos; Girmay Medhin; Worku Mulat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Urban sanitation coverage and environmental fecal contamination: Links between the household and public environments of Accra, Ghana.

Authors:  David M Berendes; Amy E Kirby; Julie A Clennon; Chantal Agbemabiese; Joseph A Ampofo; George E Armah; Kelly K Baker; Pengbo Liu; Heather E Reese; Katharine A Robb; Nii Wellington; Habib Yakubu; Christine L Moe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Barriers to cleaning of shared latrines in slums of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Kidist Hailu; Zewdie Aderaw Alemu; Metadel Adane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.