Literature DB >> 25157774

Clinical staging of patients with early esophageal adenocarcinoma: does FDG-PET/CT have a role?

Sonia L Betancourt Cuellar1, Brett W Carter, Homer A Macapinlac, Jaffer A Ajani, Ritsuko Komaki, James W Welsh, Jeffrey H Lee, Stephen G Swisher, Arlene M Correa, Jeremy J Erasmus, Wayne L Hofstetter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal carcinoma is a significant worldwide health problem and the incidence is increasing faster than that of any other malignancy. 18F-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is important in the management of patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer and is useful in initial staging of locally advanced cancer and after neoadjuvant therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine the utility of FDG-PET/CT in the clinical staging of early-stage esophageal cancer.
METHODS: Subjects in this retrospective study were 79 consecutive patients with cTisN0 (high-grade dysplasia) and cT1N0 primary esophageal adenocarcinoma diagnosed by endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound biopsy that were evaluated with preoperative FDG-PET/CT and had not received neoadjuvant therapy. Seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer cTNM and FDG-PET/CT were compared with postoperative pTNM staging. pT1 was subdivided into intramucosal cancers with lamina propria or muscularis mucosa invasion (pT1a) and submucosal cancers (pT1b).
RESULTS: In pT staging, the frequency of FDG uptake increased with increasing pT, from pT1a 21 of 39 (53.8%) to pT1b 19 of 22 (55.8%). pTis was three of five (60.0%). Similarly, the maximum standardized uptake value of FDG-avid lesions increased with increasing pT, with median values of 3.7 for pTis, 3.8 for pT1a and 4.2 for T1b. In cN staging, FDG-PET/CT was negative in 76 patients and positive in three patients. All three patients with FDG-avid nodes on FDG-PET/CT were negative for metastatic disease on biopsy. In 12 patients with pN1 and in one patient with N2, FDG-PET/CT was falsely negative. Sensitivity and positive predictive value for pN disease were 0% and accuracy was 82%. There were no distant metastases. In cM staging, FDG-PET/CT was falsely positive in five patients (FDG avid nodules n = 3, distant nodal metastasis n = 2) and resulted in unwarranted biopsy in four patients.
CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT is not useful in the TNM staging of primary adenocarcinoma of the esophagus when endoscopy and biopsy indicate cTis and cT1. In fact, FDGPET/CT can be detrimental to patient management. Because regional nodal metastases are uncommon and distant metastases rare, and as FDG-PET/CT can result in inappropriate clinical care, FDG-PET/CT should not be performed in the evaluation of early-stage esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25157774     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  16 in total

1.  A study about different findings of PET-CT between neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy: SUVmax is not a reliable predictor of lymphatic involvement after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jae Kil Park; Jae Jun Kim; Seok Whan Moon
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Prevalence of metastasis in T1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 258 Chinese patients.

Authors:  Xiaotong Qi; Mingna Li; Sheng Zhao; Jinhua Luo; Yongfeng Shao; Zhihong Zhang; Yijiang Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Positron emission tomography for initial staging of esophageal cancer among medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Vlad V Simianu; Thomas K Varghese; Meghan R Flanagan; David R Flum; Veena Shankaran; Brant K Oelschlager; Michael S Mulligan; Douglas E Wood; Carlos A Pellegrini; Farhood Farjah
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-06

4.  Routine staging with endoscopic ultrasound in patients with obstructing esophageal cancer and dysphagia rarely impacts treatment decisions.

Authors:  Sara A Mansfield; Samer El-Dika; Somashekar G Krishna; Kyle A Perry; Jon P Walker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  [Pretherapeutic misclassification of esophageal cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction : Possibilities and clinical consequences].

Authors:  I Gockel; F Lordick; O Lyros; N Kreuser; A H Hölscher; C Wittekind
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Authors:  Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam; Viktoriya Paroder; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.802

7.  FDG-PET/CT lymph node staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophageal-gastric junction.

Authors:  Pavel Fencl; Otakar Belohlavek; Tomas Harustiak; Milada Zemanova
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-11

Review 8.  Is endoscopic ultrasound examination necessary in the management of esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Tomas DaVee; Jaffer A Ajani; Jeffrey H Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Metabolic and Immunological Subtypes of Esophageal Cancer Reveal Potential Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Ryan J King; Fang Qiu; Fang Yu; Pankaj K Singh
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-08

10.  Surgically resected T1- and T2-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: T and N staging performance of EUS and PET/CT.

Authors:  Dong Young Jeong; Min Yeong Kim; Kyung Soo Lee; Joon Young Choi; Soo Jeong Kim; Myung Jin Chung; Yang Won Min; Hong Kwan Kim; Jae Ill Zo; Young Mog Shim; Jong-Mu Sun
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.